Implementing standards-based assessment effectively: incorporating discussion of exemplars into classroom teaching

Many universities are moving to greater use of standards-based assessment to support effective student learning. Implementing a standards-based approach includes involving academic staff in writing descriptions of standards for assessment tasks both to guide the marking process and clarify staff expectations for students. However, recent research shows many students find written descriptions of standards difficult to understand unless they are helped to engage with assignment exemplars. Teacher-led marking and discussion of exemplars in class result in increased student understanding of standards and higher achievement. This mixed-methods study explores students' perceptions of the usefulness of exemplars, and the effects of different teacher styles in leading in-class marking of exemplars. An interactive style in which the teacher provides a balanced explanation of the standards embedded in exemplars is associated with higher student achievement. A minimal institutional approach to implementing standards-based assessment, in which staff simply construct and distribute written grade descriptors to students to support effective learning may have little or no overall benefit, particularly for students transitioning to their first year at university. Staff development activities may need to focus on helping teachers expand their conceptions of the role of assessment for learning while also supporting their development of written assessment standards.

[1]  David Carless,et al.  How Assessment Supports Learning: Learning-Oriented Assessment in Action , 2006 .

[2]  Karen Handley,et al.  From copying to learning: using exemplars to engage students with assessment criteria and feedback , 2011 .

[3]  D. Sadler Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems , 1989 .

[4]  Qualitatively different ways of differentiating student achievement: a phenomenographic study of academics’ conceptions of grade descriptors , 2004 .

[5]  Chris Rust,et al.  Know what I mean? Enhancing student understanding of assessment standards and criteria , 2004 .

[6]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[7]  D. Royce Sadler,et al.  Interpretations of criteria‐based assessment and grading in higher education , 2005 .

[8]  D. Royce Sadler,et al.  Specifying and Promulgating Achievement Standards , 1987 .

[9]  Sara Hammer Demonstrating Quality Outcomes in Learning and Teaching: Examining ‘Best practice’ in the Use of Criterion-referenced Assessment , 2007 .

[10]  D. Watkins,et al.  Awareness of the backwash effect of assessment: A phenomenographic study of the views of Hong Kong and Swedish lecturers , 2005 .

[11]  H. Andrade The Effects of Instructional Rubrics on Learning to Write , 2001 .

[12]  Tamsin Haggis Pedagogies for diversity: retaining critical challenge amidst fears of ‘dumbing down’ , 2006 .

[13]  H. Andrade,et al.  A review of rubric use in higher education , 2010 .

[14]  Chris Rust,et al.  Improving Students' Learning by Developing their Understanding of Assessment Criteria and Processes , 2003 .

[15]  R. Green,et al.  Observations from the Field , 2006 .

[16]  D. Carless Differing perceptions in the feedback process , 2006 .

[17]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[18]  A. Onwuegbuzie,et al.  Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come , 2004 .

[19]  Susan Armstrong,et al.  Constructive guidance and feedback for learning: the usefulness of exemplars, marking sheets and different types of feedback in a first year law subject , 2011 .

[20]  Ursula Wingate,et al.  A framework for transition: supporting 'learning to learn' in higher education , 2007 .