The strength and the impact of new media

This paper presents a perspective on the impact and use of new media that focuses on the strength of the interpersonal tie connecting communicators. Research shows that more strongly tied pairs communicate more frequently, maintain more and different kinds of relations and use more media to communicate. It is argued that where ties are strong, communicators adapt their use of media and expand to other media to support the exchanges important to their tie; where ties are weak communicators rely on few means of contact (often only one), and depend on media and protocols established by others. It is theorized that dependence on a common, widely used medium makes a weak tie network vulnerable to dissolution and reformulation following changes to that medium; by contrast strong ties are more robust under conditions of change since their connection rests on multiple relations and media.

[1]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[2]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[3]  Nava Pliskin,et al.  Group development in the virtual workplace: the story of a strike , 1998 .

[4]  R. Rice.  Task Analyzability, Use of New Media, and Effectiveness: A Multi-Site Exploration of Media Richness , 1992 .

[5]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[6]  David W. Park,et al.  Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 1994 .

[7]  S. Kiesler,et al.  The kindness of strangers: on the usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice , 1996 .

[8]  R. Zmud,et al.  Improving Interorganizational Effectiveness through Voice Mail Facilitation of Peer-to-Peer Relationships , 1995 .

[9]  Mark S. Granovetter.  T H E S T R E N G T H O F WEAK TIES: A NETWORK THEORY REVISITED , 1983 .

[10]  J. Walther.  Relational Aspects of Computer-Mediated Communication: Experimental Observations over Time , 1995 .

[11]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Studying Online Social Networks , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[12]  L. Smith-Lovin,et al.  Homophily in voluntary organizations: Status distance and the composition of face-to-face groups. , 1987 .

[13]  Timothy Koschmann,et al.  Cscl : Theory and Practice of An Emerging Paradigm , 1996 .

[14]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication , 1986 .

[15]  M. Markus.  Electronic Mail as the Medium of Managerial Choice , 1994 .

[16]  R. Bostrom,et al.  Group Development (I): A Review and Synthesis of Development Models , 1997 .

[17]  E.,et al.  GROUPS : INTERACTION AND PERFORMANCE , 2001 .

[18]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Emergence of Communication Networks , 1999 .

[19]  M. Lynn.  Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , 1996 .

[20]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Explicit and Implicit Structuring of Genres in Electronic Communication: Reinforcement and Change of Social Interaction , 1999 .

[21]  S. D. Berkowitz,et al.  Social Structures: A Network Approach , 1989 .

[22]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Community Development Among Distance Learners: Temporal and Technological Dimensions , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[23]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Collaborative work networks among distributed learners , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[24]  Tora K. Bikson,et al.  Work Group Structures and Computer Support , 1989 .

[25]  John Scott.  What is social network analysis , 2010 .

[26]  B. Wellman.  Computer Networks As Social Networks , 2001, Science.

[27]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  Measuring Tie Strength , 1984 .

[28]  Bonnie A. Nardi,et al.  It's Not What You Know, It's Who You Know: Work in the Information Age , 2000, First Monday.

[29]  Janet Fulk,et al.  The Theory Imperative , 1990 .

[30]  G. DeSanctis,et al.  Shaping organization form : communication, connection, and community , 1999 .

[31]  Dimitrina S. Dimitrova,et al.  Computer Networks as Social Networks: Collaborative Work, Telework, and Virtual Community , 1996 .

[32]  P. Kollock,et al.  Communities in Cyberspace , 2002 .

[33]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Collaborative genres for collaboration: genre systems in digital media , 1997, Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[34]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Video as a technology for informal communication , 1993, CACM.

[35]  S. Wasserman,et al.  Statistical Models for Social Support Networks , 1993 .

[36]  B. Nardi,et al.  It's Not What You Know, It's Who You Know: Work in the Information Age , 2000, First Monday.

[37]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[38]  M. Feldman.  Electronic mail and weak ties in organizations , 1987 .

[39]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Exploring Multiplexity: Social Network Structures in a Computer-Supported Distance Learning Class , 2001, Inf. Soc..

[40]  C. Haythornthwaite.  Online Personal Networks , 2000 .

[41]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Work, Friendship, and Media Use for Information Exchange in a Networked Organization , 1998, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[42]  Sara Kiesler.  Culture of the Internet , 1997 .

[43]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[44]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  Group Development (II): Implications for GSS Research and Practice , 1997 .

[45]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Artifacts and Paradoxes in New Media , 1999, New Media Soc..

[46]  S. D. Berkowitz,et al.  Social Structures: A Network Approach , 1989 .

[47]  R. Rice,et al.  Electronic Emotion , 1987 .

[48]  Tim O'Shea,et al.  'Flaming' in computer-mediated communication: Observations, explanations, implications. , 1992 .

[49]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Internet paradox. A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? , 1998, The American psychologist.

[50]  Patricia R. Webb.  Cybersociety: Computer-mediated communication and community , 1996 .

[51]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Network Analysis and Computer-Mediated Communication Systems , 1994 .

[52]  J. Gabarro.  The development of working relationships , 1990 .

[53]  N. Contractor,et al.  Communication networks and new media in organizations , 1990 .

[54]  Janet Fulk,et al.  Organizations and Communication Technology , 1990 .

[55]  D. Krackhardt.  The strength of strong ties: The importance of Philos in organizations , 2003 .

[56]  Shoshana Zuboff.  In the Age of the Smart Machine , 1988 .

[57]  Thomas A. Finholt,et al.  Electronic Groups at Work. , 1990 .

[58]  H. Ibarra.  Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. , 1992 .

[59]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group decision making and communication technology , 1992 .

[60]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Changing patterns or patterns of change: the effects of a change in technology on social network str , 1990 .

[61]  L. Freeman.  THE IMPACT OF COMPUTER BASED COMMUNICATION ON THE SOCIAL STRUCTURE OF AN EMERGING SCIENTIFIC SPECIALTY , 1984 .