Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography # 13 . 24 Do inventors talk to strangers ? On proximity and collaborative knowledge creation

This paper examines the characteristics of the collaborations between inventors in the United Kingdom (UK) by looking at what types of proximities – geographic, organisational, cognitive, social, and cultural–ethnic – between inventors are prevalent in partnerships that ultimately lead to technological progress. Using a new panel of UK inventors this paper provides an analysis of associations between these ‘proximities’ and co-patenting. The results show that while collaboration within firms, research centres and universities remains crucial, external networks of inventors are key feature of innovation teams. The analysis shows that external networks are highly dependent on previous social connections, but are generally unconstrained by cultural or cognitive factors. Geographical proximity is also weakly linked with external networks. Our results suggest that innovation policies should, rather than focus on spatial clustering, facilitate the formation of open and diverse networks of inventors.

[1]  C. Sabel,et al.  Roepke Lecture in Economic Geography Venture Capital in the “Periphery”: The New Argonauts, Global Search, and Local Institution Building , 2008 .

[2]  Scott Stern,et al.  Academic Science and Entrepreneurship: Dual Engines of Growth , 2007 .

[3]  Daniel F. McCaffrey,et al.  A Review of Stata Commands for Fixed-Effects Estimation in Normal Linear Models , 2012 .

[4]  Ajay Agrawal,et al.  How do spatial and social proximity influence knowledge flows? Evidence from patent data , 2008 .

[5]  S Radosevic.  Technological change and economic catch-up. The role of science and multinationals. , 2007 .

[6]  P. Portugal,et al.  A Simple Feasible Alternative Procedure to Estimate Models with High-Dimensional Fixed Effects , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[7]  Thomas Scherngell,et al.  Determinants of Collaboration in European R&D Networks: Empirical Evidence from a Binary Choice Model Perspective , 2008 .

[8]  L. Soete,et al.  The rise of technological power in the South , 2010 .

[9]  The determinants of co-inventor tie formation: proximity and network dynamics , 2010 .

[10]  Thorsten Schank,et al.  Practical Fixed-Effects Estimation Methods for the Three-Way Error-Components Model , 2006 .

[11]  José Lobo,et al.  Metropolitan patenting, inventor agglomeration and social networks: A tale of two effects , 2008 .

[12]  P. Muller,et al.  Do birds of a feather flock together? Proximities and inter-clusters network , 2011 .

[13]  Ashish Arora,et al.  Sojourns and Software: Internationally Mobile Human Capital and High-Tech Industry Development in India, Ireland, and Israel , 2008 .

[14]  Gary King,et al.  Logistic Regression in Rare Events Data , 2001, Political Analysis.

[15]  P. Longley,et al.  Ethnicity and Population Structure in Personal Naming Networks , 2011, PloS one.

[16]  William R. Kerr,et al.  Ethnic Scientific Communities and International Technology Diffusion , 2007, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[18]  M. Slade,et al.  Spillovers in Space: Does Geography Matter? , 2010 .

[19]  D. Mowery.  Technological Innovation in a Multipolar System , 2001 .

[20]  David L. Rigby,et al.  Mapping Knowledge Space and Technological Relatedness in US Cities , 2013 .

[21]  Koen Frenken,et al.  The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration , 2007 .

[22]  Stefano Breschi,et al.  Mobility of inventors and the geography of knowledge spillovers. New evidence on US data , 2006 .

[23]  Daniel F. McCaffrey,et al.  A Review of Stata Routines for Fixed Effects Estimation in Normal Linear Models , 2010 .

[24]  Iwan von Wartburg,et al.  Why are some independent inventors 'heroes' and others 'hobbyists'? The moderating role of technological diversity and specialization , 2009 .

[25]  Max Nathan.  Same Difference? Minority Ethnic Inventors, Diversity and Innovation in the UK , 2015 .

[26]  Keld Laursen,et al.  The effect of regional social capital and external knowledge acquisition on process and product innovation , 2008 .

[27]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity , 2005 .

[28]  R. Mudambi.  Location, Control and Innovation in Knowledge-Intensive Industries , 2008 .

[29]  Robin I. M. Dunbar,et al.  Do Birds of a Feather Flock Together? , 2013, Human Nature.

[30]  Ulrich Kaiser,et al.  Labor Mobility, Social Network Effects, and Innovative Activity , 2011, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[31]  Peter Thompson,et al.  Patent Citations and the Geography of Knowledge Spillovers: Evidence from Inventor- and Examiner-added Citations , 2006, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[32]  David L. Rigby,et al.  Technological Relatedness and Knowledge Space: Entry and Exit of US Cities from Patent Classes , 2015 .

[33]  F. Docquier,et al.  Globalization, Brain Drain and Development , 2012, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[34]  A. Venables,et al.  Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy , 2004 .

[35]  Monica Gaughan,et al.  How do men and women differ in research collaborations? An analysis of the collaborative motives and strategies of academic researchers☆ , 2011 .

[36]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  The Triple Helix as a model for innovation studies , 1998 .

[37]  Pablo D'Este,et al.  The spatial profile of university-business research partnerships , 2010 .

[38]  R. Creecy,et al.  Computing Person and Firm Effects Using Linked Longitudinal Employer-Employee Data , 2002 .

[39]  A. Scott,et al.  Development on the ground : clusters, networks and regions in emerging economies , 2007 .

[40]  Ron Boschma,et al.  The Emergence of New Industries at the Regional Level in S pain: A Proximity Approach Based on Product Relatedness , 2013 .

[41]  Max Nathan.  Ethnic Inventors, Diversity and Innovation in the UK: Evidence from Patents Microdata , 2011 .

[42]  D. Archibugi,et al.  The globalisation of technology and its implications for developing countries: Windows of opportunity or further burden? , 2003 .

[43]  Raffaele Paci,et al.  Proximity, Networks and Knowledge Production in Europe , 2011 .

[44]  Waverly W. Ding,et al.  The Determinants of Faculty Patenting Behavior: Demographics or Opportunities? , 2005 .

[45]  S. Iammarino,et al.  Foreign multinationals and domestic innovation: Intra-industry effects and firm heterogeneity , 2015 .

[46]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[47]  William R. Kerr,et al.  Breakthrough Inventions and Migrating Clusters of Innovation , 2009 .

[48]  R. Crescenzi,et al.  R&D, Spillovers, Innovation Systems and the Genesis of Regional Growth in Europe. Bruges European Economic Research (BEER) Papers 5/October 2006 , 2006 .

[49]  Henry Wai-chung Yeung,et al.  Regional Development and the Competitive Dynamics of Global Production Networks: An East Asian Perspective , 2009 .

[50]  Sokbae Lee,et al.  Is Distance Dying at Last? Falling Home Bias in Fixed Effects Models of Patent Citations , 2007 .

[51]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[52]  W. Glänzel,et al.  Analysing Scientific Networks Through Co-Authorship , 2004 .

[53]  P. Mateos.  A review of name-based ethnicity classification methods and their potential in population studies , 2007 .

[54]  R. Freeman,et al.  Why and Wherefore of Increased Scientific Collaboration , 2014 .

[55]  P. Thompson,et al.  Patent Citations and the Geography of Knowledge Spillovers: A Reassessment , 2005 .

[56]  S. Breschi,et al.  Mobility of Skilled Workers and Co-Invention Networks: An Anatomy of Localized Knowledge Flows , 2009 .

[57]  Ajay Agrawal,et al.  Why are some regions more innovative than others? The role of small firms in the presence of large labs , 2014 .

[58]  M. Ruef,et al.  Strong ties, weak ties and islands: structural and cultural predictors of organizational innovation , 2002 .

[59]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Scientific Teams and Institution Collaborations: Evidence from U.S. Universities, 1981-1999 , 2004 .

[60]  R. Crescenzi,et al.  Moving people with ideas - innovation inter-regional mobility and firm heterogeneity , 2015 .

[61]  Max Nathan.  The Economics of Super-Diversity: Findings from British Cities, 2001- 2006 , 2011 .

[62]  Dan Ariely,et al.  Contextual and procedural determinants of partner selection : Of asymmetric dominance and prominence , 1999 .

[63]  Manfred M. Fischer,et al.  Patents, Patent Citations and the Geography of Knowledge Spillovers in Europe , 2009 .

[64]  Daniel A. Ackerberg,et al.  Endogenous Matching and the Empirical Determinants of Contract Form , 2001, Journal of Political Economy.

[65]  Daniel Z. Levin,et al.  The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[66]  Francesco Lissoni,et al.  The Keins Database on Academic Inventors: Methodology and Contents , 2006 .

[67]  Daniele Archibugi,et al.  The globalization of technological innovation: definition and evidence , 2002 .

[68]  J. Angrist.  Mostly Harmless Econometrics , 2008 .

[69]  A. Agrawal,et al.  Gone but not Forgotten: Knowledge Flows, Labor Mobility, and Enduring Social Relationships , 2006 .

[70]  Pablo D'Este,et al.  Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography # 11 . 06 Shaping the formation of university-industry research collaborations : what type of proximity does really matter ? , 2011 .

[71]  P Mateos,et al.  Name analysis to classify populations by ethnicity in public health: validation of Onomap in Scotland. , 2011, Public health.

[72]  R. Crescenzi,et al.  Social Capital and the Innovative Performance of Italian Provinces , 2013 .

[73]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Multi-University Research Teams: Shifting Impact, Geography, and Stratification in Science , 2008, Science.

[74]  Matthew O. Jackson,et al.  The Economics of Social Networks , 2005 .

[75]  Andrés Rodríguez-Pose,et al.  When local interaction does not suffice : Sources of firm innovation in urban Norway , 2011 .

[76]  André Torre,et al.  Proximity and Localization , 2005 .

[77]  A. Saxenian.  The New Argonauts: Regional Advantage in a Global Economy , 1994 .

[78]  K. Frenken,et al.  Innovation, spillovers, and university-industry collaboration: An extended knowledge production function approach , 2010 .

[79]  Jasjit Singh,et al.  Collaborative Networks as Determinants of Knowledge Diffusion Patterns , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[80]  William R. Kerr,et al.  The Agglomeration of Us Ethnic Inventors , 2008 .

[81]  W. Kerr,et al.  The Supply Side of Innovation: H-1b Visa Reforms and Us Ethnic Invention , 2008 .

[82]  William R. Kerr,et al.  The Supply Side of Innovation: H‐1B Visa Reforms and U.S. Ethnic Invention , 2008, Journal of Labor Economics.

[83]  R. Boschma.  Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment , 2005 .

[84]  R. Crescenzi,et al.  The territorial dynamics of innovation: a Europe-United States Comparative Analysis , 2007 .

[85]  R. Boschma,et al.  The Spatial Evolution of Innovation Networks: A Proximity Perspective , 2010 .

[86]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations , 2004, Scientometrics.

[87]  Lee Fleming,et al.  Small Worlds and Regional Innovation , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[88]  Karin Hoisl,et al.  Inventors and invention processes in Europe: Results from the PatVal-EU survey , 2007 .

[89]  A Simple Feasible Procedure to fit Models with High-dimensional Fixed Effects , 2010 .

[90]  Renaud Lambiotte,et al.  Community structure and patterns of scientific collaboration in Business and Management , 2011, Scientometrics.

[91]  R. Blundell,et al.  Dynamic Count Data Models of Technological Innovation , 1994 .

[92]  R. Coase.  The Nature of the Firm , 1937 .

[93]  M. Mariani,et al.  When Distance Disappears: Inventors, Education, and the Locus of Knowledge Spillovers , 2013, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[94]  P. Longley,et al.  Names-based classification of accident and emergency department users. , 2011, Health & place.

[95]  John Seely Brown,et al.  Book Reviews : The Social Life of Information By John Seely Brown and Paul Duguid. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2000. 320 pages , 2000 .

[96]  Benjamin F. Jones.  The Burden of Knowledge and the &Apos;Death of the Renaissance Man&Apos;: Is Innovation Getting Harder? , 2005 .