Perceived control, effort, and academic performance: Interindividual, intraindividual, and multivariate time-series analyses.

A naturalistic study tested a model depicting how perceived control functions to regulate and interpret children's cognitive performances. Data, collected daily in the classroom over 4 mo, were organized around children's cognitive performances (graded assignments). For each homework and test, children provided information about effort, performance, attributions (effort, ability, concentration/help, task difficulty, and unknown causes), and expected control. The data formed a sequence of beliefs–performance–beliefs "loops" for each child. Although data at the interindividual level were consistent with the model, intraindividual data revised each link; furthermore, exploratory multivariate time-series analyses suggested that different models may best fit single Ss. Intraindividual implications included adding mediators to the model and designing interventions to fit individual children.

[1]  M. Seligman,et al.  Learned helplessness in humans: critique and reformulation. , 1978, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[2]  C. Dweck The role of expectations and attributions in the alleviation of learned helplessness. , 1975 .

[3]  L. Abramson,et al.  Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: sadder but wiser? , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[4]  P. Baltes,et al.  Interpreting correlations between children's perceived control and cognitive performance: Control, agency, or means€nds beliefs? , 1990 .

[5]  B. Weiner,et al.  A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences. , 1979, Journal of educational psychology.

[6]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[7]  V C CRANDALL,et al.  CHILDREN'S BELIEFS IN THEIR OWN CONTROL OF REINFORCEMENTS IN INTELLECTUAL-ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT SITUATIONS. , 1965, Child development.

[8]  D. Watson Intraindividual and interindividual analyses of positive and negative affect: their relation to health complaints, perceived stress, and daily activities. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  E. Skinner,et al.  Children's agency beliefs, cognitive performance, and conceptions of effort and ability: individual and developmental differences. , 1989, Child development.

[10]  Michael Chapman,et al.  Control, means-ends, and agency beliefs : A new conceptualization and its measurement during childhood , 1988 .

[11]  J. Connell,et al.  What It Takes to Do Well in School and Whether I've Got It: A Process Model of Perceived Control and Children's Engagement and Achievement in School , 1990 .

[12]  Harris Cooper,et al.  Locus of control and academic achievement: A literature review. , 1983 .

[13]  S. Harter,et al.  Development perspectives on the self-system , 1983 .

[14]  R. Ryan,et al.  Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. , 1989 .

[15]  H. Lefcourt Locus of control: Current trends in theory and research , 1976 .

[16]  D. R. Shaffer Social and personality development , 1979 .

[17]  J. Connell,et al.  A new multidimensional measure of children's perceptions of control. , 1985, Child development.

[18]  F. Försterling,et al.  Attributional retraining: a review. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  Jutta Heckhausen,et al.  Motivation and action , 1991 .

[20]  David Rogosa,et al.  A critique of cross-lagged correlation , 1980 .