Critical analysis of clinical research reporting in pediatric surgery: justifying the need for a new standard.

[1]  M. Brindle,et al.  Small evidence for small incisions: pediatric laparoscopy and the need for more rigorous evaluation of novel surgical therapies. , 2003, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[2]  JoDee Anderson,et al.  Development of a quality assessment scale for retrospective clinical studies in pediatric surgery. , 2003, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[3]  R. L. Moss,et al.  The need for critical analysis of case-series reporting in pediatric surgery. , 2002, Seminars in pediatric surgery.

[4]  J. Hall,et al.  Baseline comparisons in surgical trials , 2002, ANZ journal of surgery.

[5]  Robert C. G. Martin,et al.  Quality of Complication Reporting in the Surgical Literature , 2002, Annals of surgery.

[6]  R. L. Moss.  The CONSORT statement: Progress in clinical research in pediatric surgery. , 2001, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[7]  A. Thakur,et al.  Methodology standards associated with quality reporting in clinical studies in pediatric surgery journals. , 2001, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[8]  B. Efron,et al.  A meta-analysis of peritoneal drainage versus laparotomy for perforated necrotizing enterocolitis. , 2001, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[9]  E. Skarsgard,et al.  The role of prospective randomized clinical trials in pediatric surgery: state of the art? , 2001, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[10]  D. Moher,et al.  Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before-and-after evaluation. , 2001, JAMA.

[11]  J. Miller,et al.  Evidence-Based Surgery Chirurgie factuelle Users ’ guide to evidence-based surgery : how to use an article evaluating surgical interventions , 2001 .

[12]  W. Hardin,et al.  Evidence-based practice in pediatric surgery. , 1999, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[13]  L. Spitz,et al.  Evidence-based operations in paediatric surgery , 1998, Pediatric Surgery International.

[14]  J. Hall,et al.  Surgery on trial: an account of clinical trials evaluating operations. , 1998, Surgery.

[15]  C. Meinert.  Beyond CONSORT: need for improved reporting standards for clinical trials. Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials. , 1998, JAMA.

[16]  I. Olkin,et al.  Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. , 1996, JAMA.

[17]  J. Hall,et al.  Methodologic standards in surgical trials. , 1996, Surgery.

[18]  R. J. Hayes,et al.  Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. , 1995, JAMA.

[19]  J. Ward,et al.  Randomized, controlled trials in surgery , 1994, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[20]  G. Murray,et al.  Statistical guidelines for the British Journal of Surgery , 1991, The British journal of surgery.

[21]  G. Murray,et al.  Statistical aspects of research methodology , 1991, The British journal of surgery.

[22]  J M Yancey,et al.  Ten rules for reading clinical research reports. , 1990, American journal of surgery.

[23]  Squires Bp,et al.  Statistics in biomedical manuscripts: what editors want from authors and peer reviewers , 1989 .

[24]  M. Bracken.  Reporting observational studies , 1989, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[25]  R. Thisted,et al.  Clinical trials in general surgical journals: are methods better reported? , 1999, Surgery.

[26]  Kenneth F. Schulz,et al.  The CONSORT Statement , 1996 .

[27]  R. McLeod,et al.  Clinical studies in surgical journals—have we improved? , 1993, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[28]  J. D. Emerson,et al.  Reporting clinical trials in general surgical journals. , 1984, Surgery.