Performing universal tasks using a mini iPad: usability assessment per people with intellectual disabilities

With this study we aim at assessing if a mini iPad device is a usable option for digital interaction to perform selection, manipulation, and insertion tasks by people with intellectual disabilities. This study builds on previous studies where usability was evaluated for universal tasks using the keyboard and a mouse input device [1]. This allowed us to assess the usability of a small mini iPad and compare it with other two input devices, namely keyboards and the mouse. For usability assessment we registered the following variables: successful conclusion of activities, type of difficulties found, errors and satisfaction indicators. The results showed that this group was much motivated to learn how to handle with the iPad, several asked to repeat the task and no one quit any task requested. Despite the number of errors as registered in their interaction, they always knew how to overcome the error and never showed frustration or demotivation. Furthermore, they had a good performance (relation between variables: time to conclude the task, number of errors and difficulties felt) with the mini iPad device, however when compared with the keyboard and mouse, their performance increased.

[1]  Jeon Small,et al.  Web accessibility for people with cognitive disabilities , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[2]  James D. Foley,et al.  The human factors of computer graphics interaction techniques , 1984, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[3]  B. Harrysson,et al.  How people with developmental disabilities navigate the Internet , 2004 .

[4]  Luís Magalhães,et al.  Performing universal tasks on the Web: interaction with digital content by people with intellectual disabilities , 2015, Interacción.

[5]  Luís Magalhães,et al.  Usability evaluation of navigation tasks by people with intellectual disabilities: a Google and SAPO comparative study regarding different interaction modalities , 2017, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[6]  A. Balanskat The ICT Impact Report : A review of studies of ICT impact on schools in Europe, European Schoolnet , 2006 .

[7]  Emanuel Peres,et al.  The recognition of web pages' hyperlinks by people with intellectual disabilities: an evaluation study. , 2012, Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID.

[8]  Luís Magalhães,et al.  Different interaction paradigms for different user groups: an evaluation regarding content selection , 2014, Interacción '14.

[9]  Tony DeRose,et al.  Determining the benefits of direct-touch, bimanual, and multifinger input on a multitouch workstation , 2009, Graphics Interface.

[10]  R. Chao,et al.  DSM‐IV‐TR: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , 2013 .