Ordering in disguise: digital integration in built-environment practices

ABSTRACT The digital integration of built-environment practices aims to bridge a large variety of organizations to improve building delivery and operation. However, recent research on building information modelling (BIM) reported organizational challenges arising from digital integration. This suggests a need to develop a critical perspective on digital-integration-driven organizational change. Adopting a practice-based approach, this paper exposes the practice-level phenomenon responsible for the ongoing change to develop a critical understanding and enable better interventions. The concepts of ‘simplification’ and ‘systematization’ of digital integration are developed from previous literature and then used to explore and interrelate the practice-level experiences of digital integration (i.e. the experience of the change from within) and the emerging patterns of interactions (i.e. the picture of the change from outside) in a BIM-enabled design project. The concept of ‘ordering in disguise’ is proposed to capture this phenomenon. It shows that practitioners experience digital integration as various task-specific instances of unresponsive technology. However, they are unaware that their ongoing efforts to accommodate it actually further reinforce digital integration’s simplification and systematization. This makes the unresponsiveness of technology harder to challenge, and ultimately forces the organization to change and adapt to it. Implications for management of practice are outlined.

[1]  Chris Harty,et al.  Innovation in construction: a sociology of technology approach , 2005 .

[2]  Chad Engelland,et al.  Being and Time (1927) , 2017 .

[3]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Theorizing Practice and Practicing Theory , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[4]  P. Love,et al.  A benefits realization management building information modeling framework for asset owners , 2014 .

[5]  Ayse Saka,et al.  Internal change agents’ view of the management of change problem , 2003 .

[6]  K. K. Cetina,et al.  The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory , 2001 .

[7]  Jennifer Whyte,et al.  Managing digital coordination of design: emerging hybrid practices in an institutionalized project setting , 2011 .

[8]  Jan Mouritsen,et al.  Enterprise resource planning systems, management control and the quest for integration , 2005 .

[9]  T. G.,et al.  Logic in Practice , 1934, Nature.

[10]  L. Suchman Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions (2nd edition). , 2007 .

[11]  Trevor Hopper,et al.  What does organizational change mean?: Speculations on a taken for granted category , 2001 .

[12]  Carrie Sturts Dossick,et al.  A CASE STUDY OF THE FAILURE OF DIGITAL COMMUNICATION TO CROSS KNOWLEDGE BOUNDARIES IN VIRTUAL CONSTRUCTION , 2010 .

[13]  Seung Wan Hong,et al.  Integrated system for BIM-based collaborative design , 2015 .

[14]  Ioanna D. Constantiou,et al.  New games, new rules: big data and the changing context of strategy , 2015, J. Inf. Technol..

[15]  Silvia Gherardi,et al.  How to Conduct a Practice-based Study: Problems and Methods , 2013 .

[16]  Pasquale Pagano,et al.  Data Interoperability , 2013, Data Sci. J..

[17]  D. Seidl,et al.  Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice , 2011 .

[18]  Chris Harty,et al.  Emerging Hybrid Practices in Construction Design Work: Role of Mixed Media , 2010 .

[19]  Jennifer Whyte,et al.  Professionalism in digitally mediated project work , 2013 .

[20]  Eric Monteiro,et al.  Inscribing behaviour in information infrastructure standards , 1997 .

[21]  Theo Vurdubakis,et al.  Information technology as organization/disorganization , 2005, Inf. Organ..

[22]  Niraj Thurairajah,et al.  Leveraging collaboration through the use of building information models , 2014 .

[23]  Robert Chia,et al.  Choice, Chance, and Unintended Consequences in Strategic Change: A Process Understanding of the Rise and Fall of NorthCo Automotive , 2013 .

[24]  Rizal Sebastian,et al.  Changing roles of the clients, architects and contractors through BIM , 2011 .

[25]  Chris Harty,et al.  Implementing innovation in construction: contexts, relative boundedness and actor‐network theory , 2008 .

[26]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[27]  Claudio U. Ciborra,et al.  Designing Dynamic Artifacts: Computer Systems as Formative Contexts , 2017 .

[28]  P. Leonardi,et al.  What’s Under Construction Here? Social Action, Materiality, and Power in Constructivist Studies of Technology and Organizing , 2010 .

[29]  Stephen R. Rosenthal,et al.  Ethnographies in the Front End: Designing for Enhanced Customer Experiences* , 2006 .

[30]  M. Feldman,et al.  Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change , 2003 .

[31]  Jennifer Whyte,et al.  Coordination and control in project‐based work: digital objects and infrastructures for delivery , 2010 .

[32]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  When Flexible Routines Meet Flexible Technologies: Affordance, Constraint, and the Imbrication of Human and Material Agencies , 2011, MIS Q..

[33]  Hugh Durrant-Whyte,et al.  Coordination and Control , 2020, Organizational Design.

[34]  Carrie Sturts Dossick,et al.  Organizational Divisions in BIM-Enabled Commercial Construction , 2010 .

[35]  Jennifer Whyte,et al.  Managing change in the delivery of complex projects: Configuration management, asset information and 'big data' , 2016 .

[36]  Lucy Suchman,et al.  Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions , 2006 .

[37]  Ian Hutchby,et al.  Technologies, Texts and Affordances , 2001 .

[38]  J. Overhage,et al.  Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[39]  Mustafa Emirbayer Manifesto for a Relational Sociology1 , 1997, American Journal of Sociology.

[40]  Jannis Kallinikos,et al.  The Architecture of the Invisible: Technology is Representation , 1995 .

[41]  Pasquale Pagano,et al.  Virtual Research Environments: An Overview and a Research Agenda , 2013, Data Sci. J..

[42]  Jannis Kallinikos,et al.  The Consequences of Information: Institutional Implications of Technological Change , 2007 .

[43]  Salman Azhar,et al.  Building information modelling (BIM): now and beyond , 2012 .

[44]  Paul Dourish,et al.  The Appropriation of Interactive Technologies: Some Lessons from Placeless Documents , 2003, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[45]  Jennifer Whyte,et al.  Beyond the computer: Changing medium from digital to physical , 2013, Inf. Organ..

[46]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000, Theory in CSCW.

[47]  Steven H. Appelbaum,et al.  Back to the future: revisiting Kotter's 1996 change model , 2012 .

[48]  A. Parrish Managing change. , 1996, Nursing management.

[49]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice: Practice in research: phenomenon, perspective and philosophy , 2010 .

[50]  Robert Chia,et al.  On Organizational Becoming: Rethinking Organizational Change , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[51]  I. Greener,et al.  Theorising path‐dependency: how does history come to matter in organisations? , 2002 .

[52]  T. Schatzki The Site of the Social: A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change , 2002 .

[53]  Vibha Gaba,et al.  Organizing Far from Equilibrium: Nonlinear Change in Organizational Fields , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[54]  W. Orlikowski Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work , 2007 .

[55]  Carrie Sturts Dossick,et al.  Messy talk and clean technology: communication, problem-solving and collaboration using Building Information Modelling , 2011 .

[56]  Julien Pollack,et al.  Understanding the divide between the theory and practice of organisational change , 2015 .

[57]  Davide Nicolini,et al.  Zooming in and zooming out : a package of method and theory to study work practices , 2009 .

[58]  Jörgen Sandberg GRASPING THE LOGIC OF PRACTICE : THEORIZING THROUGH PRACTICAL RATIONALITY , 2011 .

[59]  Geoffrey C. Bowker,et al.  Enacting silence: Residual categories as a challenge for ethics, information systems, and communication , 2007, Ethics and Information Technology.

[60]  Paul Beynon-Davies,et al.  Significance: Exploring the Nature of Information, Systems and Technology , 2010 .

[61]  Stephen Turner,et al.  The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of the Social Sciences , 2008 .

[62]  Anita Moum,et al.  Design team stories: Exploring interdisciplinary use of 3D object models in practice , 2010 .

[63]  R. Hepburn,et al.  BEING AND TIME , 2010 .