Strategic supply chains: a configurational perspective

PurposeDrawing on configuration theory and adopting a holistic perspective, the authors aim to explore strategic supply chain elements' interaction with internal and external contextual conditions. Specifically, they evaluate multivariate co-alignment of supply chain's capabilities (agility, adaptability, alignment), adhocracy organizational structure and environmental uncertainty (dynamism, munificence and complexity) that lead to superior performance outcomes (supply chain cycle time, financial performance, market performance).Design/methodology/approachA survey research design is adopted to collect primary and secondary data from 182 international firms. Cluster analysis and profile deviation techniques are employed first to derive a taxonomy of strategic supply chains and then examine multivariate co-alignment.FindingsThe analysis reveals that four groups of triple-A supply chains could emerge. It is found that strategic supply chains exhibit a flexible/organic/fluid organizational structure and a high level of triple-As in their processes. These supply chains perform superior to a higher level of environmental complexity, munificence and dynamism.Practical implicationsThis study's results provide insights for practitioners by informing their investment decisions for developing strategic supply chains. Specifically, this research highlights the contextuality of triple-A supply chains and offers best practices to capitalize on strategic supply chains.Originality/valueExecutives in organizations require a holistic understanding of various elements to ensure that the organizational system as a whole performs effectively. This research offers insights into the interdependencies of triple-A supply chains with other organizational and external environmental elements. Noteworthy implications for scholarship in operations/supply chain management and supply chain practitioners are presented.

[1]  Constantin Blome,et al.  The performance impact of supply chain agility and supply chain adaptability: the moderating effect of product complexity , 2015 .

[2]  D. Hambrick.  High Profit Strategies in Mature Capital Goods Industries: A Contingency Approach , 1983 .

[3]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. , 1985 .

[4]  Peer C. Fiss,et al.  Embracing Causal Complexity , 2017 .

[5]  C. C. Snow,et al.  The Role of Entrepreneurship in Building Cultural Competitiveness in Different Organizational Types , 2003 .

[6]  David M. Gligor,et al.  The triple-a supply chain and strategic resources: developing competitive advantage , 2020 .

[7]  A. Roth,et al.  A taxonomy of manufacturing strategies , 1994 .

[8]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Complementarity in Organizations , 2012 .

[9]  Eve D. Rosenzweig.  A contingent view of e-collaboration and performance in manufacturing , 2009 .

[10]  D. Gligor,et al.  Examining the synergistic effect of supply chain agility, adaptability and alignment: a complementarity perspective , 2021 .

[11]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  Environment--strategy coalignment: an empirical test of its performance implications , 2011 .

[12]  G. Hult,et al.  Knowledge as a strategic resource in supply chains , 2006 .

[13]  C. Holsapple,et al.  Best-value supply chains and firms’ competitive performance: empirical studies of their linkage , 2015 .

[14]  M. C. Holcomb,et al.  An exploration of the strategic antecedents of firm supply chain agility: The role of a firm's orientations , 2016 .

[15]  Denis Royston Towill,et al.  Total cycle time compression and the agile supply chain , 1999 .

[16]  T. Stank,et al.  Applying the strategy‐structure‐performance paradigm to the supply chain environment , 2005 .

[17]  Charles C. Snow,et al.  A configurational approach to the integration of strategy and organization research , 2005 .

[18]  R. Duncan.  Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty. , 1972 .

[19]  R. A. Inman,et al.  Agile manufacturing: Relation to JIT, operational performance and firm performance , 2011 .

[20]  Kenneth W. Green,et al.  Triple‐A supply chain performance , 2012 .

[21]  G. Stock,et al.  Enterprise logistics and supply chain structure: the role of fit , 2000 .

[22]  C. Fornell,et al.  Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics , 1981 .

[23]  C. C. Snow,et al.  Organizational Configurations and Performance: A Comparison of Theoretical Approaches , 1993 .

[24]  Alan W. Mackelprang,et al.  The Relationship Between Strategic Supply Chain Integration and Performance: A Meta‐Analytic Evaluation and Implications for Supply Chain Management Research , 2014 .

[25]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Returning to the Frontier of Contingency Theory of Organizational and Institutional Designs , 2013 .

[26]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[27]  D. Ketchen,et al.  Information Processing, Knowledge Development, and Strategic Supply Chain Performance , 2004 .

[28]  Michael J. Maloni,et al.  Benchmarking the triple-A supply chain: orchestrating agility, adaptability, and alignment , 2019, Benchmarking: An International Journal.

[29]  M. Cao,et al.  Supply chain collaboration: Impact on collaborative advantage and firm performance , 2011 .

[30]  Paul Milgrom,et al.  Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing , 1995 .

[31]  William H. Glick,et al.  Typologies As a Unique Form Of Theory Building: Toward Improved Understanding and Modeling , 1994 .

[32]  David J. Ketchen,et al.  Toward greater integration of insights from organization theory and supply chain management , 2007 .

[33]  Christopher M. McDermott,et al.  Configurations in manufacturing strategy: a review and directions for future research , 1998 .

[34]  David M. Gligor,et al.  The Role of Supply Chain Agility in Achieving Supply Chain Fit , 2016, Decis. Sci..

[35]  Justin W. Webb,et al.  A multi‐theoretic perspective on trust and power in strategic supply chains , 2007 .

[36]  Yasmine Sabri.  In pursuit of supply chain fit , 2019, The International Journal of Logistics Management.

[37]  E. L. Nichols,et al.  AN EXAMINATION OF CULTURAL COMPETITIVENESS AND ORDER FULFILLMENT CYCLE TIME WITHIN SUPPLY CHAINS , 2002 .

[38]  H. Correa,et al.  The impact of supply chain fit on business and innovation performance in Brazilian companies , 2020 .

[39]  David Lei,et al.  Toward an Empirical Prioritization of Contingency Variables for Business Strategy , 1985 .

[40]  Malte Brettel,et al.  Configurations of resources and capabilities and their performance implications: an exploratory study on technology ventures , 2010 .

[41]  C. Gersick.  Pacing Strategic Change: The Case of a New Venture , 1994 .

[42]  B. Menguc,et al.  Balancing exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of competitive intensity , 2005 .

[43]  Divesh Ojha,et al.  Supply chain organizational infrastructure for promoting entrepreneurial emphasis and innovativeness: The role of trust and learning , 2016 .

[44]  David J. Ketchen,et al.  THE APPLICATION OF CLUSTER ANALYSIS IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH: AN ANALYSIS AND CRITIQUE , 1996 .

[45]  P. H. Friesen,et al.  Archetypes of Strategy Formulation , 1978 .

[46]  Dov Te'eni,et al.  From generative fit to generative capacity: exploring an emerging dimension of information systems design and task performance , 2009, Inf. Syst. J..

[47]  D. Gligor,et al.  The triple-As supply chain competitive advantage , 2019, Benchmarking: An International Journal.

[48]  Patricia J. Daugherty,et al.  Review of logistics and supply chain relationship literature and suggested research agenda , 2011 .

[49]  G. Hult,et al.  Best value supply chains: A key competitive weapon for the 21st century , 2008 .

[50]  Nicolaj Siggelkow.  Firms as Systems of Interdependent Choices , 2011 .

[51]  J. Wacker.  A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management , 1998 .

[52]  Roderick E. White,et al.  An Organizational Learning Framework : From Intuition to Institution Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[53]  G. Hult,et al.  Strategic supply chain management: Improving performance through a culture of competitiveness and knowledge development , 2007 .

[54]  M. Fisher.  What is the Right Supply Chain for Your Product , 1997 .

[55]  M. Wiersema,et al.  Top management team turnover as an adaptation mechanism: The role of the environment , 1993 .

[56]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Dimensions of Organizational Task Environments. , 1984 .

[57]  J. Barney,et al.  Organizational Culture: Can It Be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage? , 1986 .

[58]  Terry S. Overton,et al.  Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys , 1977 .

[59]  Peter T. Ward,et al.  Configurations of Manufacturing Strategy, Business Strategy, Environment and Structure , 1996 .

[60]  Kangkang Yu,et al.  Fits and misfits of supply chain flexibility to environmental uncertainty: Two types of asymmetric effects on performance , 2016 .

[61]  Tobias Schoenherr,et al.  The Roles of Supply Chain Intelligence and Adaptability in New Product Launch Success , 2015, Decis. Sci..

[62]  M. C. Holcomb,et al.  Antecedents and Consequences of Integrating Logistics Capabilities across the Supply Chain , 2014 .

[63]  Qingyu Zhang,et al.  Manufacturing flexibility: Defining and analyzing relationships among competence, capability, and customer satisfaction , 2003 .

[64]  M. Porter,et al.  Contextuality Within Activity Systems and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage , 2008 .

[65]  Brian S. Fugate,et al.  Linking improved knowledge management to operational and organizational performance , 2009 .

[66]  David J. Miller,et al.  Configurations of strategy and structure: Towards a synthesis , 1986 .

[67]  H.L. Lee,et al.  Aligning Supply Chain Strategies with Product Uncertainties , 2002, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[68]  David M. Gligor,et al.  A Multidisciplinary Approach to Supply Chain Agility: Conceptualization and Scale Development , 2013 .

[69]  William H. Glick,et al.  Fit, Equifinality, and Organizational Effectiveness: A Test of Two Configurational Theories , 1993 .

[70]  Stephan M. Wagner,et al.  The link between supply chain fit and financial performance of the firm , 2012 .

[71]  A. Roth,et al.  The effect of an ambidextrous supply chain strategy on combinative competitive capabilities and business performance , 2010 .

[72]  Nicolaj Siggelkow.  Evolution toward Fit , 2002 .

[73]  G. Hult,et al.  A longitudinal study of the learning climate and cycle time in supply chains , 2002 .

[74]  Pankaj C. Patel,et al.  The effect of environmental complexity and environmental dynamism on lean practices , 2013 .

[75]  Martin Christopher,et al.  Supply chain 2.0 revisited: a framework for managing volatility-induced risk in the supply chain , 2017 .

[76]  David F. Larcker,et al.  Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics: , 1981 .

[77]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  The Concept of Fit in Strategy Research: Towards Verbal and Statistical Correspondence , 2018 .

[78]  Danny Miller,et al.  Environmental Fit Versus Internal Fit , 1992 .

[79]  Barbara B. Flynn,et al.  The impact of supply chain integration on performance: A contingency and configuration approach , 2010 .

[80]  G. Tomas M. Hult,et al.  Cultural Competitiveness in Global Sourcing , 2002 .

[81]  Rajshree Agarwal,et al.  Performance Differentials between Diversifying Entrants and Entrepreneurial Start-Ups: A Complexity Approach , 2007 .

[82]  Thomas J. Goldsby,et al.  Effect of service supplier performance on satisfaction and loyalty of store managers in the fast food industry , 1999 .

[83]  Neal Schmitt,et al.  Configurations of Organizational Effectiveness and Efficiency , 1993 .

[84]  Stefan Meisiek,et al.  Seeing More and Seeing Differently: Sensemaking, Mindfulness, and the Workarts , 2010 .

[85]  M. C. Holcomb,et al.  Performance outcomes of supply chain agility: When should you be agile? , 2015 .

[86]  R. Daft,et al.  Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretation Systems , 1984 .

[87]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations , 1967 .

[88]  Jan W. Rivkin.  Imitation of Complex Strategies , 2000 .

[89]  R. Vandenberg,et al.  A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research , 2000 .

[90]  Lisa M. Ellram,et al.  The Effects of Strategic and Structural Supply Chain Orientation on Operational and Customer-Focused Performance , 2013, Decis. Sci..

[91]  A. Tsui,et al.  Configurational Approaches to Organizational Analysis , 1993 .

[92]  Charles C. Snow,et al.  Typology-Driven Theorizing: A Response to Delbridge and Fiss , 2014 .

[93]  A. Richter,et al.  The Whole Is More Than the Sum of Its Parts— Or Is It? A Review of the Empirical Literature on Complementarities in Organizations , 2010 .

[94]  Juan A. Marin-Garcia,et al.  Triple-A and competitive advantage in supply chains: Empirical research in developed countries , 2018, International Journal of Production Economics.

[95]  Christopher A. Voss,et al.  Contingency research in operations management practices , 2008 .

[96]  Danny Miller,et al.  The Genesis of Configuration , 1987 .

[97]  Nagesh N. Murthy,et al.  The antecedents of supply chain agility of a firm: Scale development and model testing , 2006 .