How much is an icon worth?

We report a new technique for assessing the amount of information extracted from the icon that follows a briefly presented picture. The problem of how to measure such information was formulated in terms of how much physical exposure of a picture an icon is worth. Consider two types of stimulus presentations, each with a base duration of d ms. The first is a d-ms picture followed by an icon, and the second is a d + a-ms picture not followed by an icon. How large does a have to be so that equivalent amounts of information are extracted in the two cases? To answer this question, we showed people pictures and later tested their memory for the pictures. We found that the physical exposure duration needed to reach a particular level of performance was approximately 100 ms longer when an icon was not permitted versus when the icon was permitted. This value was independent of the base duration and the luminance of the picture. Moreover, the same value was obtained using three different kinds of memory test and four different sets of pictures. We conclude that an icon is worth approximately 100 ms of additional physical exposure duration. A reasonable explanation for this robust equivalence between icon and stimulus is that the same encoding processes are responsible for extracting information from the icon and from the physical stimulus. Therefore, any variable that affects these encoding processes must affect extraction of information from the icon and the physical stimulus in an identical manner. This prediction was confirmed for one such variable, picture luminance.

[1]  G. Loftus,et al.  Perceptual and conceptual masking of pictures. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  C L Krumhansl,et al.  Abrupt changes in visual stimulation enhance processing of form and location information , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  HUMAN KINETICS , 1952 .

[4]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Iconic memory and visible persistence , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  G L Shulman,et al.  Two definitions of persistence in visual perception , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .

[7]  David E. Rumelhart,et al.  A multicomponent theory of the perception of briefly exposed visual displays , 1970 .

[8]  H. Intraub,et al.  Presentation rate and the representation of briefly glimpsed pictures in memory. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[9]  N. Clark,et al.  Direct Evidence , 1934 .

[10]  G M Long,et al.  The case for peripheral persistence: effects of target and background luminance on a partial-report task. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  Philip M. Merikle,et al.  Processing time and memory for pictures. , 1976 .

[12]  C W Eriksen,et al.  Some temporal characteristics of visual pattern perception. , 1967, Journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  G. Sperling A Model for Visual Memory Tasks1 , 1963, Human factors.

[14]  G. Loftus Picture perception: effects of luminance on available information and information-extraction rate. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[15]  D. W. Massaro Perceptual Processes and Forgetting in Memory Tasks. , 1970 .

[16]  J Jonides,et al.  The psychophysics of iconic storage. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  C. Richard Puff,et al.  Handbook of research methods in human memory and cognition , 1983 .

[18]  M. Orne On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. , 1962 .

[19]  M. Turvey On peripheral and central processes in vision: inferences from an information-processing analysis of masking with patterned stimuli. , 1973, Psychological review.

[20]  William G. Chase,et al.  Short-term visual storage , 1967 .

[21]  G R Loftus,et al.  Two types of information in picture memory. , 1975, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[22]  J. Pola,et al.  Visual persistence: effects of flash luminance, duration and energy. , 1974, Vision research.

[23]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[24]  G. Loftus,et al.  Encoding and use of detail information in picture recognition. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[25]  R. Efron,et al.  Effect of stimulus duration on perceptual onset and offset latencies , 1970 .

[26]  O. Sabouraud [Space perception]. , 1978, Revue d'oto-neuro-ophtalmologie.

[27]  M. Potter,et al.  Recognition memory for a rapid sequence of pictures. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[28]  E Kowler,et al.  Transient stimulation does not aid visual search: Implications for the role of saccades , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  Geoffrey R. Loftus,et al.  Two types of information in picture memory. , 1975 .

[30]  R. Haber,et al.  Direct estimates of the apparent duration of a flash. , 1970 .

[31]  R Efron,et al.  The relationship between the duration of a stimulus and the duration of a perception. , 1970, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  Vincent Di Lollo,et al.  Temporal integration in visual memory. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[33]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .

[34]  M. Potter Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[35]  V. Lollo Temporal integration in visual memory. , 1980 .