The role of the envelope in processing iterated rippled noise.

Iterated rippled noise (IRN) is generated by a cascade of delay and add (the gain after the delay is 1.0) or delay and subtract (the gain is -1.0) operations. The delay and add/subtract operations impart a spectral ripple and a temporal regularity to the noise. The waveform fine structure is different in these two conditions, but the envelope can be extremely similar. Four experiments were used to determine conditions in which the processing of IRN stimuli might be mediated by the waveform fine structure or by the envelope. In experiments 1 and 3 listeners discriminated among three stimuli in a single-interval task: IRN stimuli generated with the delay and add operations (g = 1.0), IRN stimuli generated using the delay and subtract operations (g = -1.0), and a flat-spectrum noise stimulus. In experiment 2 the listeners were presented two IRN stimuli that differed in delay (4 vs 6 ms) and a flat-spectrum noise stimulus that was not an IRN stimulus. In experiments 1 and 2 both the envelope and waveform fine structure contained the spectral ripple and temporal regularity. In experiment 3 only the envelope had this spectral and temporal structure. In all experiments discrimination was determined as a function of high-pass filtering the stimuli, and listeners could discriminate between the two IRN stimuli up to frequency regions as high as 4000-6000 Hz. Listeners could discriminate the IRN stimuli from the flat-spectrum noise stimulus at even higher frequencies (as high as 8000 Hz), but these discriminations did not appear to depend on the pitch of the IRN stimuli. A control experiment (fourth experiment) suggests that IRN discriminations in high-frequency regions are probably not due entirely to low-frequency nonlinear distortion products. The results of the paper imply that pitch processing of IRN stimuli is based on the waveform fine structure.

[1]  J. Smurzyński,et al.  Pitch identification and discrimination for complex tones with many harmonics , 1990 .

[2]  W. Shofner,et al.  Temporal representation of rippled noise in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus of the chinchilla. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  F. Bilsen,et al.  The Pitch of Anharmonic Comb Filtered Noise Reconsidered , 1992 .

[4]  W. Yost Pitch and pitch discrimination of broadband signals with rippled power spectra. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  B. Delgutte,et al.  Neural correlates of the pitch of complex tones. II. Pitch shift, pitch ambiguity, phase invariance, pitch circularity, rate pitch, and the dominance region for pitch. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  Reinier Plomp,et al.  Aspects of tone sensation , 1976 .

[7]  T. Dau Modeling auditory processing of amplitude modulation , 1997 .

[8]  W A Yost,et al.  A time domain description for the pitch strength of iterated rippled noise. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Jorge E. Lopez de Cardenas,et al.  Collapse of a long cylindrical bubble , 1991 .

[10]  B. L. Cardozo,et al.  Pitch of the Residue , 1962 .

[11]  Roy D. Patterson,et al.  The relative strength of the tone and noise components in iterated rippled noise , 1996 .

[12]  W. Yost Pitch strength of iterated rippled noise. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Ray Meddis,et al.  Virtual pitch and phase sensitivity of a computer model of the auditory periphery , 1991 .

[14]  B. Delgutte,et al.  Neural correlates of the pitch of complex tones. I. Pitch and pitch salience. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  W. Yost Pitch of iterated rippled noise. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Roy D. Patterson,et al.  The sound of a sinusoid: Spectral models , 1994 .

[17]  W A Yost Pitch strength of iterated rippled noise when the pitch is ambiguous. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  L. A. Jeffress,et al.  Stimulus‐Oriented Approach to Detection , 1964 .

[19]  F. A. Bilsen,et al.  Atonal Periodicity Sensation for Comb Filtered Noise Signals , 1980 .

[20]  Olga N. Milekhina,et al.  Frequency resolving power measured by rippled noise , 1994, Hearing Research.

[21]  N. Viemeister Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  Frans A. Bilsen,et al.  Repetition pitch and its implications for hearing theory , 1969 .

[23]  R. Patterson,et al.  Residue pitch as a function of component spacing. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  R. Patterson,et al.  Time-domain modeling of peripheral auditory processing: a modular architecture and a software platform. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  A. Rosenberg,et al.  Effect of masking on the pitch of periodic pulses. , 1965, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  W. Yost,et al.  Models of the pitch and pitch strength of ripple noise , 1979 .