Feeling the Future Again: Retroactive Avoidance of Negative Stimuli

During the past decades, several theories have been proposed that relate quantum mechanics to information processing in the human mind. These theories predict that the arrow of time has no direction during unconscious processing states. Across 7 experiments, we tested whether masked negative stimuli presented in the future lead to an unconscious avoidance reaction in the presence. Response registration took place about 500 milliseconds before stimulus onset. In the majority of the studies, the predicted retroactive influence was found. On average, participants were able to unconsciously avoid negative future outcomes (mean ES = 0.07; Combined Bayes factor = 293). These results are in line with similar precognitive avoidance effects recently reported by Daryl Bem in 2011 (Experiment 2). The reported findings are discussed with regard to the proposed quantum model of the mind. We also highlight the limitations of our research.

[1]  Roger Penrose,et al.  What 'gaps'? Reply to Grush and Churchland , 1995 .

[2]  Roger Penrose,et al.  Consciousness in the Universe: Neuroscience, Quantum Space-Time Geometry and Orch OR Theory , 2011 .

[3]  Leif D. Nelson,et al.  False-Positive Psychology , 2011, Psychological science.

[4]  Stuart Hameroff,et al.  How quantum brain biology can rescue conscious free will , 2012, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[5]  Ray Hyman,et al.  The Ganzfeld Psi experiment: a critical appraisal , 1985 .

[6]  Dean Radin,et al.  Consciousness and the double-slit interference pattern: Six experiments , 2012 .

[7]  D. Bem Feeling the future: experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect. , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  E. Schrödinger Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik , 1935, Naturwissenschaften.

[9]  H. Atmanspacher,et al.  Weak Quantum Theory: Complementarity and Entanglement in Physics and Beyond , 2001 .

[10]  Hans-Ulrich Hoche The Conception of Anthropological Complementarism. An Introduction Appeared in print as the 'Introduction' of Hans-Ulrich Hoche, Anthropological Complementarism. Linguistic, Logical, and Phenomenological Studies in Support of a Third Way Beyond Dualism and Monism. , 2008 .

[11]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Quantum Structure in Cognition , 2008, 0805.3850.

[12]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[13]  Jean-Luc Brédas,et al.  The speed of information in a ‘ fast-light ’ optical medium , 2022 .

[14]  R. Penrose Cycles of Time , 2010 .

[15]  H. Roemer Weak Quantum Theory an the Emergence of Time , 2004, quant-ph/0402011.

[16]  Luca Viganò,et al.  Back from the future , 2010, J. Appl. Non Class. Logics.

[17]  Joel L. Lebowitz,et al.  Boltzmann's Entropy and Time's Arrow , 1993 .

[18]  P. Lang International affective picture system (IAPS) : affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual , 2005 .

[19]  Thomas P. Turiel Quantum Random Bit Generators , 2007 .

[20]  Michael B. Mensky,et al.  Everett Interpretation and Quantum Concept of Consciousness , 2013 .

[21]  Harald Atmanspacher,et al.  Contra Classical Causality Violating Temporal Bell Inequalities in Mental Systems , 2012 .

[22]  Charles Seife Decoding the Universe: How the New Science of Information Is Explaining Everything in the Cosmos, from Our Brains to Black Holes , 2007 .

[23]  C. Honorton,et al.  "Future telling": A meta-analysis of forced-choice precognition experiments, 1935–1987. , 1989 .

[24]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: the case of psi: comment on Bem (2011). , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  H. Walach,et al.  Generalized Entanglement – A Nonreductive Option for a Phenomenologically Dualist and Ontologically Monist View of Consciousness , 2011 .

[26]  Doreen Meier,et al.  How The Self Controls Its Brain , 2016 .

[27]  S. Hameroff,et al.  The “Quantum Soul”: A Scientific Hypothesis , 2012 .

[28]  M. Esfeld Is Quantum indeterminism Relevant to Free Will , 2000 .

[29]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[30]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[31]  Jerome R. Busemeyer,et al.  A Quantum Probability Model of Causal Reasoning , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[32]  Roger Penrose,et al.  Orchestrated reduction of quantum coherence in brain microtubules: A model for consciousness , 1996 .

[33]  A. Einstein Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper , 1905 .

[34]  H. Walach,et al.  Complementarity of Phenomenal and Physiological Observables: A Primer on Generalised Quantum Theory and Its Scope for Neuroscience and Consciousness Studies , 2011 .

[35]  H. Stowell The emperor's new mind R. Penrose, Oxford University Press, New York (1989) 466 pp. $24.95 , 1990, Neuroscience.

[36]  N. Bohr The Quantum Postulate and the Recent Development of Atomic Theory , 1928, Nature.

[37]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Computation of Bayes Factors for Common Designs , 2015 .

[38]  H. Walach,et al.  Synchronistic phenomena as entanglement correlations in generalized quantum theory , 2007 .

[39]  L. Mandel,et al.  Induced coherence and indistinguishability in optical interference. , 1991, Physical review letters.

[40]  Hawking,et al.  Chronology protection conjecture. , 1992, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[41]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  A Bayes factor meta-analysis of Bem’s ESP claim , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[42]  Stuart J. Ritchie,et al.  Failing the Future: Three Unsuccessful Attempts to Replicate Bem's ‘Retroactive Facilitation of Recall’ Effect , 2012, PloS one.

[43]  H. Zeh On the interpretation of measurement in quantum theory , 1970 .

[44]  William G. Faris Shadows of the Mind: A Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness , 1997 .

[45]  J. Eccles How the Self Controls Its Brain , 1994 .

[46]  Lee Smolin,et al.  Time Reborn: From the Crisis in Physics to the Future of the Universe , 2013 .

[47]  A. Zajonc,et al.  The Quantum Challenge: Modern Research on the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics , 1997 .

[48]  Leif D. Nelson,et al.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Correcting the Past : Failures to Replicate Psi , 2012 .

[49]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in Psychology † , 2013 .

[50]  Henry P. Stapp,et al.  Mindful Universe: Quantum Mechanics and the Participating Observer , 2011 .

[51]  Thomas Filk,et al.  Generalized Quantum Theory: Overview and Latest Developments , 2011, 1202.1659.

[52]  J. Busemeyer,et al.  A quantum probability explanation for violations of ‘rational’ decision theory , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[53]  K. Fiedler,et al.  Afterthoughts on precognition: No cogent evidence for anomalous influences of consequent events on preceding cognition , 2013 .

[54]  Julia Mossbridge,et al.  Predictive Physiological Anticipation Preceding Seemingly Unpredictable Stimuli: A Meta-Analysis , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[55]  W. Johnson,et al.  Must psychologists change the way they analyze their data? , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[56]  S.W.Hawking The Nature of Space and Time , 1994 .

[57]  Jennifer S Trueblood,et al.  A quantum theoretical explanation for probability judgment errors. , 2011, Psychological review.

[58]  H. Walach,et al.  Complementarity is a useful concept for consciousness studies. A Reminder. , 2000, Neuro endocrinology letters.