A catastrophe of the magnitude of the earthquake and tsunami that hit Chile not long ago, forces us to raise some questions that we will try to answer from a philosophical, ethical and responsibility viewpoints. An analysis of the basic principles of bioethics is also justified. A natural catastrophe is not, by itself, moral or immoral, fair or unfair. However, its consequences could certainly be regarded as such, depending on whether they could have been prevented or mitigated. We will identify those individuals, who have the ethical responsibility to attend the victims and the ethical principles that must guide the tasks of healthcare and psychological support teams. The minimal indispensable actions to obtain an adequate social and legal protection of vulnerable people, must be defined according to international guidelines. These reflections are intended to improve the responsibility of the State and all the community, to efficiently prevent and repair the material and psychological consequences of such a catastrophe. (Rev Med Chile 2012; 140: 108-112).
[1]
Thomas Mautner,et al.
Rights
,
2008,
Radical Hope.
[2]
A. Ferrara.
La fuerza del ejemplo. Exploraciones del paradigma del juicio
,
2008
.
[3]
Jonathan F. Fanton,et al.
Human Rights Watch
,
2022,
The Fairchild Books Dictionary of Fashion.
[4]
Juan Mª de Velasco Gogenola.
La bioética y el principio de solidaridad: una perspectiva desde la ética teológica
,
2003
.
[5]
State Sovereignty.
The Responsibility to Protect
,
2001
.
[6]
Adela Cortina Orts.
Alianza y contrato: política, ética y religión
,
2001
.
[7]
L. Bourque.
The Public Health Consequences of Disasters
,
1997
.
[8]
P. Ricoeur.
Sí mismo como otro
,
1996
.
[9]
E. Lévinas.
Entre nosotros: ensayos para pensar en otro
,
1993
.