The Role of the Corpus Callosum in Interhemispheric Transfer of Information: Excitation or Inhibition?

The corpus callosum is the major neural pathway that connects homologous cortical areas of the two cerebral hemispheres. The nature of how that interhemispheric connection is manifested is the topic of this review; specifically, does the corpus callosum serve to communicate an inhibitory or excitatory influence on the contralateral hemisphere? Several studies take the position that the corpus callosum provides the pathway through which a hemisphere or cortical area can inhibit the other hemisphere or homologous cortical area in order to facilitate optimal functional capacity. Other studies suggest that the corpus callosum integrates information across cerebral hemispheres and thus serves an excitatory function in interhemispheric communication. This review examines these two contrasting theories of interhemispheric communication. Studies of callosotomies, callosal agenesis, language disorders, theories of lateralization and hemispheric asymmetry, and comparative research are critically considered. The available research, no matter how limited, primarily supports the notion that the corpus callosum serves a predominantly excitatory function. There is evidence, however, to support both theories and the possibility remains that the corpus callosum can serve both an inhibitory and excitatory influence on the contralateral hemisphere.

[1]  R. Sperry,et al.  Relearning tests for interocular transfer following division of optic chiasma and corpus callosum in cats. , 1956, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[2]  N. Geschwind,et al.  Human Brain: Left-Right Asymmetries in Temporal Speech Region , 1968, Science.

[3]  R. Sperry.  Lateral specialization in the surgically separated hemispheres. , 1974 .

[4]  M. Kinsbourne.  The mechanism of hemispheric control of the lateral gradient of attention , 1975 .

[5]  Maureen Dennis,et al.  Impaired sensory and motor differentiation with corpus callosum agenesis: A lack of callosal inhibition during ontogeny? , 1976, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  M. Kinsbourne,et al.  Does Cerebral Dominance Develop , 1977 .

[7]  R. Sperry,et al.  Self recognition and social awareness in the deconnected minor hemisphere , 1979, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  M. Kinsbourne.  Hemispheric specialization and the growth of human understanding. , 1982, The American psychologist.

[9]  Alan Leviton,et al.  The Developing human brain: Growth and epidemiologic neuropathology , 1983 .

[10]  J. Sergent.  Unified response to bilateral hemispheric stimulation by a split-brain patient , 1983, Nature.

[11]  N. Cook,et al.  Homotopic callosal inhibition , 1984, Brain and Language.

[12]  K. Heilman,et al.  The effect of corpus callosum lesions on unilateral neglect in monkeys , 1984, Neurology.

[13]  N. Geschwind,et al.  Cerebral lateralization. Biological mechanisms, associations, and pathology: I. A hypothesis and a program for research. , 1985, Archives of neurology.

[14]  D. Benson,et al.  The Dual brain : hemispheric specialization in humans , 1985 .

[15]  N. Geschwind,et al.  Developmental dyslexia: Four consecutive patients with cortical anomalies , 1985, Annals of neurology.

[16]  V. Denenberg,et al.  Callosal mediation of cortical inhibition in the lateralized rat brain , 1986, Brain Research.

[17]  J. R. Hughes.  Cerebral lateralization: biological mechanisms, associations and pathology , 1987 .

[18]  Kenneth Hugdahl,et al.  Handbook of dichotic listening: Theory, methods and research. , 1988 .

[19]  M. Bryden.  An overview of the dichotic listening procedure and its relation to cerebral organization. , 1988 .

[20]  G. Hynd,et al.  Brain morphology in developmental dyslexia and attention deficit disorder/hyperactivity. , 1990, Archives of neurology.

[21]  Aysenil Belger,et al.  Interhemispheric Interaction: How Do the Hemispheres Divide and Conquer a Task? , 1990, Cortex.

[22]  Jerre Levy,et al.  Left Side, Right Side: A Review of Laterality Research , 1990 .

[23]  A. Galaburda,et al.  Individual variability in cortical organization: Its relationship to brain laterality and implications to function , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  Torleiv Høien,et al.  MRI evaluation of the size and symmetry of the planum temporale in adolescents with developmental dyslexia , 1990, Brain and Language.

[25]  H. Lubs,et al.  Neuroanatomic differences between dyslexic and normal readers on magnetic resonance imaging scans. , 1991, Archives of neurology.

[26]  U Bellugi,et al.  Callosal morphology concurs with neurobehavioral and neuropathological findings in two neurodevelopmental disorders. , 1992, Archives of neurology.

[27]  Torleiv Høien,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the corpus callosum in developmental dyslexia , 1992 .

[28]  Robert B. Lufkin,et al.  Corpus callosum morphometry and dichotic listening performace: Individual differences in functional interhemispheric inhibition? , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  Lynn C. Robertson,et al.  A Review of Hemispheric Asymmetry: What's Right and What's Left , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[30]  B. Peterson,et al.  Functional significance of individual variations in callosal area , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  L. Katz,et al.  Sex differences in the functional organization of the brain for language , 1995, Nature.

[32]  E. Courchesne,et al.  Reduced size of corpus callosum in autism. , 1995, Archives of neurology.

[33]  C Riccio,et al.  Dyslexia and corpus callosum morphology. , 1995, Archives of neurology.

[34]  C. Chiarello,et al.  Initial right hemisphere activation of subordinate word meanings is not due to homotopic callosal inhibition , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[35]  E. Zaidel.  Interhemispheric transfer in the split brain : Long term status following complete cerebral commissurotomy , 1995 .

[36]  In Kyoon Lyoo,et al.  The corpus callosum and lateral ventricles in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: A brain magnetic resonance imaging study , 1996, Biological Psychiatry.

[37]  A. Beaton,et al.  The Relation of Planum Temporale Asymmetry and Morphology of the Corpus Callosum to Handedness, Gender, and Dyslexia: A Review of the Evidence , 1997, Brain and Language.

[38]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Phantoms in the Brain: Human Nature and the Architecture of the Mind , 1998 .

[39]  Physiological Psychology: A Neuroscience Approach , 1998 .

[40]  M. Ohkawa,et al.  Re-evaluation of sexual dimorphism in human corpus callosum. , 1999, NeuroReport.

[41]  D. Roberts.  Corpus Callosotomy in the Treatment of Neuronal Migration Disorders , 1999 .

[42]  B. Schaefer,et al.  Developmental anomalies of the brain in mental retardation , 1999 .

[43]  Norman D. Cook,et al.  Simulating Consciousness in a Bilateral Neural Network: “Nuclear” and “Fringe” Awareness , 1999, Consciousness and Cognition.

[44]  Mara L. Morr,et al.  Deviant neurophysiological asymmetry in children with language impairment , 2000, Neuroreport.

[45]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Behavioral, neurophysiological and evolutionary perspectives on unihemispheric sleep , 2000, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[46]  M. Gazzaniga.  Cerebral specialization and interhemispheric communication: does the corpus callosum enable the human condition? , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[47]  L. Jäncke,et al.  Corpus callosum size in children with developmental language disorder. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[48]  Dominique Hasboun,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetry and corpus callosum morphometry: a magnetic resonance imaging study , 2000, Neuroscience Research.

[49]  W D Hopkins,et al.  A comparative MRI study of the relationship between neuroanatomical asymmetry and interhemispheric connectivity in primates: implication for the evolution of functional asymmetries. , 2000, Behavioral neuroscience.

[50]  W. Hartje,et al.  The Bilateral Effect: Callosal Inhibition or Intrahemispheric Competition? , 2001, Brain and Cognition.