Possible Constraints of Visualization in Biology: Challenges in Learning with Multiple Representations

To demonstrate the various constraints related to visual representations in biology learning and instruction, this chapter discusses the outcomes of four empirical studies carried out in Israel on the uses of static visualization in biology as well as data from classroom observations of Israeli elementary and junior high school biology students and teachers and from textbooks. I review the challenges involved in using illustrative or decorative representations, models, representations of processes, referents of different size and temporal scales, representations on the classroom board, and the danger of erroneously transferring knowledge about representations to visualizations with supposedly similar features. The chapter may promote teachers’ and policy makers’ critical awareness of visual representations, which if not appropriately designed and implemented will create student difficulties and misconceptions. It should also contribute toward the development of relevant learning materials and the resolution of some of these teaching challenges.

[1]  Pieter Wouters,et al.  Learner Performance in Multimedia Learning Arrangements: An Analysis Across Instructional Approaches , 2009 .

[2]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking: Functional Significance of Visuospatial Representations , 2005 .

[3]  Gaëlle Molinari,et al.  Integration of new domain-related states and events from texts and illustrations by subjects with high and low prior knowledge , 2007 .

[4]  Martha J. Powell,et al.  The problem of student acceptance of evolution , 2003 .

[5]  A. Renkl,et al.  Instructional Aids to Support a Conceptual Understanding of Multiple Representations. , 2009 .

[6]  G. Hatano,et al.  Young children's naive theory of biology , 1994, Cognition.

[7]  Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver,et al.  Understanding Complex Systems: Some Core Challenges , 2006 .

[8]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Diagrams in the Mind and in the World: Relations between Internal and External Visualizations , 2004, Diagrams.

[9]  Wolfgang Schnotz,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: An Integrated Model of Text and Picture Comprehension , 2005 .

[10]  A. Miyake,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking , 2005 .

[11]  J. Deręgowski Real space and represented space: Cross-cultural perspectives , 1989, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[12]  S. Barab,et al.  Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Learning sciences , 2006 .

[13]  Tina A. Grotzer,et al.  How does grasping the underlying causal structures of ecosystems impact students' understanding? , 2003 .

[14]  Camillia Matuk,et al.  Learning to understand the tree of life , 2010 .

[15]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[16]  R. Mayer,et al.  Three Facets of Visual and Verbal Learners: Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Style, and Learning Preference. , 2003 .

[17]  Xiufeng Liu,et al.  Progression in children's understanding of the matter concept from elementary to high school , 2006 .

[18]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Cognitive Flexibility, Constructivism, and Hypertext: Random Access Instruction for Advanced Knowledge Acquisition in Ill-Structured Domains , 2012 .

[19]  Billie Eilam System thinking and feeding relations: learning with a live ecosystem model , 2012 .

[20]  M. G. Jones,et al.  Experienced and Novice Teachers’ Concepts of Spatial Scale , 2008 .

[21]  The Relationship between College Zoology Students' Beliefs about Evolutionary Theory and Religion. , 1997 .

[22]  Patsye Peebles,et al.  Patterns of Conceptual Change in Evolution , 1996 .

[23]  M. Gail Jones,et al.  Developing a Sense of Scale: Looking Backward , 2008 .

[24]  Billie Eilam,et al.  Strata of comprehending ecology: Looking through the prism of feeding relations , 2002 .

[25]  Stephen K. Reed,et al.  Thinking Visually , 2010 .

[26]  Ok-choon Park,et al.  Hypermedia: functional features and research issues , 1991 .

[27]  Shaaron Ainsworth,et al.  The functions of multiple representations , 1999, Comput. Educ..

[28]  David N. Rapp,et al.  The ‘ins’ and ‘outs’ of learning: Internal representations and external visualizations: Theory and Practice in Science Education , 2008 .

[29]  M. Ben‐Peretz,et al.  Revisiting curriculum inquiry: the role of visual representations , 2010 .

[30]  Richard Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[31]  Courtney K. Shade,et al.  Interpreting evolutionary diagrams: When topology and process conflict , 2010 .