This paper considers the coordination of domestic markets for tradable emission permits where countries determine their own emission reduction targets, using a two-country model. Linking such schemes is beneficial to both countries but may cause the exporting country to decrease its emission reduction target and export more permits. This in turn would not only reduce the costs for both countries as less emissions have to be reduced, but it also lowers the environmental benefits of the importing country. One price instrument (tariff) and two quantity instruments (discount, quota) to prevent the exporting country from issuing more permits are examined. Each instrument restricts trade and alters the terms of trade for the two countries. The importing country (and regulator) prefers an import tariff and an import quota to a carbon discount. If the exporting country releases additional permits, the importing country should not try to keep total emissions constant, as that would be ineffective and maybe even counterproductive. Instead, the importing country should aim to keep the total import constant; this would impose costs on the exporting country that are independent of the policy instrument; an import quota would be the cheapest option for the importing country. An import quota would also stress the idea of supplementary of the flexible mechanism as it increases the share of emissions reduced domestically. Compliance and liability issues constrain the market further. However, both the importing and the exporting country would prefer that the permit seller is liable in case of non-compliance, as sellers' liability would less constrain the market.
[1]
Peter Bohm.
Distributional Implications of Allowing International Trade in CO, Emission Quotas
,
1992
.
[2]
Richard S. J. Tol,et al.
The Marginal Costs of Greenhouse Gas Emissions
,
1999
.
[3]
Unfccc.
Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
,
1997
.
[4]
A. Torvanger,et al.
The feasibility of ambitious climate agreements Norway as an early test case
,
2002
.
[5]
Carsten Helm,et al.
Coalition Formation and International Trade in Greenhouse Gas Emissions
,
2003
.
[6]
P. Sands.
The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
,
1992
.
[7]
H. Westskog.
Why should emissions trading be restricted?
,
2002
.
[8]
Richard S. J. Tol,et al.
State responsibility and compensation for climate change damages--a legal and economic assessment
,
2004
.
[9]
D. Reiner,et al.
The evolution of a climate regime: Kyoto to Marrakech
,
2002
.
[10]
Claudia Kemfert,et al.
Games of Climate Change with International Trade
,
2004
.