Framework for Evaluating and Comparing Performance of Power System Reliability Criteria

Evolutions in the power system challenge the manner in which power system reliability is managed. In particular, currently used reliability criteria, typically the deterministic N-1 criterion, are increasingly inadequate. Moving to an alternative approach is difficult as quantifying benefits is hard in a multifaceted environment and system operators are reluctant to move away from the easy and transparent existing criterion. This paper presents a generic framework to evaluate and compare socio-economic and reliability performance of power system reliability criteria, focussing on the short term decision making process of transmission system operators (TSO). The framework can also be used to tune the parameters of reliability criteria. Short term operational planning and real time operation TSO decision making processes are simulated considering various reliability criteria. The framework is applied to a 5 node test system and the 24 node IEEE reliability test system, showing that the applied probabilistic reliability criterion outperforms deterministic N-0 and N-1 approaches in those systems in terms of expected reliability and socio-economic indicator values. The effect is larger in the bigger system with more operational flexibility.

[1]  Fang Yang,et al.  Advanced contingency selection methodology , 2005, Proceedings of the 37th Annual North American Power Symposium, 2005..

[2]  James D. McCalley,et al.  Risk based optimal power flow , 2001, 2001 IEEE Porto Power Tech Proceedings (Cat. No.01EX502).

[3]  Peng Wang,et al.  Online short-term reliability evaluation using a fast sorting technique , 2008 .

[4]  Louis Wehenkel,et al.  Whither probabilistic security management for real-time operation of power systems? , 2013, 2013 IREP Symposium Bulk Power System Dynamics and Control - IX Optimization, Security and Control of the Emerging Power Grid.

[5]  Roy Jensen,et al.  Reliability Modeling in Electric Power Systems , 1979 .

[6]  Kevin Tomsovic,et al.  Power System Security , 1999 .

[7]  Roy Billinton,et al.  Power-system reliability in perspective , 1984 .

[8]  Han Slootweg,et al.  Development and application of a cost-benefit framework for energy reliability using probabilistic methods in network planning and regulation to enhance social welfare : the N-1 rule , 2010 .

[9]  R. Billinton,et al.  A Reliability Test System for Educational Purposes-Basic Data , 1989, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[10]  A. Monticelli,et al.  Security-Constrained Optimal Power Flow with Post-Contingency Corrective Rescheduling , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[11]  D. Jayaweera,et al.  Comparison of risk-based and deterministic security assessments , 2007 .

[12]  G. Gross,et al.  Quantification of Market Performance as a Function of System Security , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[13]  L. Bertling,et al.  Probabilistic security assessment for power system operations , 2004, IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2004..

[14]  R D Zimmerman,et al.  MATPOWER: Steady-State Operations, Planning, and Analysis Tools for Power Systems Research and Education , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[15]  P. Pourbeik,et al.  Review of the Current Status of Tools and Techniques for Risk-Based and Probabilistic Planning in Power Systems , 2011 .

[16]  Mohammad Shahidehpour,et al.  The IEEE Reliability Test System-1996. A report prepared by the Reliability Test System Task Force of the Application of Probability Methods Subcommittee , 1999 .

[17]  Roy Billinton,et al.  Hybrid approach for reliability evaluation of composite generation and transmission systems using Monte-Carlo simulation and enumeration technique , 1991 .

[18]  N.D. Reppen,et al.  Increasing utilization of the transmission grid requires new reliability criteria and comprehensive reliability assessment , 2005, 2004 International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems.

[19]  Daniel S. Kirschen,et al.  Optimising the balance between security and economy on a probabilistic basis , 2010 .

[20]  John Lygeros,et al.  Stochastic optimal power flow based on conditional value at risk and distributional robustness , 2015 .

[21]  Georgios B. Giannakis,et al.  Robust optimal power flow with wind integration using conditional value-at-risk , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm).

[22]  Dirk Van Hertem,et al.  Smart Transmission Grids Vision for Europe: Towards a Realistic Research Agenda , 2014 .

[23]  Roy Billinton,et al.  A hybrid model for quantifying different operating states of composite power systems , 1992 .