Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41.

PURPOSE To determine performance and utilization of screening breast ultrasonography (US) in women with dense breast tissue who underwent additional screening breast US in the 1st year since implementation of Connecticut Public Act 09-41 requiring radiologists to inform patients with heterogeneous or extremely dense breasts at mammography that they may benefit from such examination. MATERIALS AND METHODS Informed consent was waived for this institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant retrospective review of 935 women with dense breasts at mammography who subsequently underwent handheld screening and whole-breast US from October 1, 2009, through September 30, 2010. RESULTS Of 935 women, 614 (65.7%) were at low risk, 149 (15.9%) were at intermediate risk, and 87 (9.3%) were at high risk for breast cancer. Of the screening breast US examinations, in 701 (75.0%), results were classified as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 1 or 2; in 187 (20.0%), results were classified as BI-RADS category 3; and in 47 (5.0%), results were classified as BI-RADS category 4. Of 63 aspirations or biopsies recommended and performed in 53 patients, in nine, lesions were BI-RADS category 3, and in 54, lesions were BI-RADS category 4. Among 63 biopsies and aspirations, three lesions were malignant (all BI-RADS category 4, diagnosed with biopsy). All three cancers were smaller than 1 cm, were found in postmenopausal patients, and were solid masses. One cancer was found in each risk group. In 44 of 935 (4.7%) patients, examination results were false-positive. Overall positive predictive value (PPV) for biopsy or aspirations performed in patients with BI-RADS category 4 masses was 6.5% (three of 46; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7%, 19%). Overall cancer detection rate was 3.2 cancers per 1000 women screened (three of 935; 95% CI: 0.8 cancers per 1000 women screened, 10 cancers per 1000 women screened). CONCLUSION Technologist-performed handheld screening breast US offered to women in the general population with dense breasts can aid detection of small mammographically occult breast cancers (cancer detection rate, 0.8-10 cancers per 1000 women screened), although the overall PPV is low.

[1]  Wendy B DeMartini,et al.  Targeted ultrasound in women younger than 30 years with focal breast signs or symptoms: outcomes analyses and management implications. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  T. M. Kolb,et al.  Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. , 2002, Radiology.

[3]  Liem T. Bui-Mansfield.  Breast Imaging, 3rd ed. , 2008 .

[4]  D. Ikeda,et al.  Interval carcinomas in the Malmö Mammographic Screening Trial: radiographic appearance and prognostic considerations. , 1992, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  Stuart S Kaplan,et al.  Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. , 2001, Radiology.

[6]  D. Goo,et al.  Sonographic Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Cystic Lesions of the Breast , 2007, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[7]  Enzo Galligioni,et al.  Breast screening with ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: evidence on incremental cancer detection and false positives, and associated cost. , 2008, European journal of cancer.

[8]  S. Feig,et al.  Screening for cancer: when is it valid?--Lessons from the mammography experience. , 2003, Radiology.

[9]  L. Venta,et al.  Management of complex breast cysts. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  Jennifer A Harvey,et al.  Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: relationship with breast cancer risk. , 2004, Radiology.

[11]  W. Berg,et al.  Cystic lesions of the breast: sonographic-pathologic correlation. , 2003, Radiology.

[12]  W. Buchberger,et al.  Incidental findings on sonography of the breast: clinical significance and diagnostic workup. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  A. Stavros,et al.  Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. , 1995, Radiology.

[14]  M. Helvie,et al.  Complicated breast cysts on sonography: is aspiration necessary to exclude malignancy? , 2008, Academic radiology.

[15]  R. Birdwell,et al.  Probably Benign Breast Masses at US: Is Follow-up an Acceptable Alternative to Biopsy? , 2008 .

[16]  W. Berg.  Supplemental screening sonography in dense breasts. , 2004, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[17]  Wendie A Berg,et al.  Cystic breast masses and the ACRIN 6666 experience. , 2010, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[18]  P. Porter,et al.  Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[19]  Regina J. Hooley,et al.  Breast Cancer Screening and Problem Solving Using Mammography, Ultrasound, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2011, Ultrasound quarterly.

[20]  E A Sickles,et al.  Malignant breast masses detected only by ultrasound: A retrospective review , 1996, Cancer.

[21]  P. Stomper,et al.  Analysis of parenchymal density on mammograms in 1353 women 25-79 years old. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  Baudouin Maldague,et al.  Mammography and subsequent whole-breast sonography of nonpalpable breast cancers: the importance of radiologic breast density. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[23]  Pavel Crystal,et al.  Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[24]  W. Buchberger,et al.  Clinically and mammographically occult breast lesions: detection and classification with high-resolution sonography. , 2000, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.

[25]  T. M. Kolb,et al.  Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US--diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. , 1998, Radiology.

[26]  L. Bonomo,et al.  Cystic Breast Lesions , 2010, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[27]  C. Merritt.  Combined Screening With Ultrasound and Mammography vs Mammography Alone in Women at Elevated Risk of Breast Cancer , 2009 .

[28]  W. Mayo-Smith,et al.  Characterization of Breast Masses With Sonography , 2005, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[29]  D. Kopans.  Sonography should not be used for breast cancer screening until its efficacy has been proven scientifically. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.