Unintended triadic closure in social networks: The strategic formation of research collaborations between French inventors

Observing that most social networks are clustered, the literature often argues that agents are more willing to form links that close triangles. We challenge this idea by proposing a simple model of new collaboration formation that shows why network clustering may arise even though agents do not "like" network closure. We address empirically this question on the longitudinal evolution of the French co-invention network, and find that two inventors are less likely to form a first research collaboration when they have common partners. Our findings further reveal the preferences of inventors towards forming non-redundant connections.

[1]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations , 2001, cond-mat/0104162.

[2]  Michael D. König The formation of networks with local spillovers and limited observability , 2016 .

[3]  A. Rapoport Spread of information through a population with socio-structural bias: I. Assumption of transitivity , 1953 .

[4]  Paul D. Allison,et al.  Fixed-Effects Methods for the Analysis of Nonrepeated Events , 2006 .

[5]  G. Ahuja Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[6]  P. Bearman,et al.  Suicide and friendships among American adolescents. , 2004, American journal of public health.

[7]  A. Jaffe Demand and Supply Influences in R&D Intensity and Productivity Growth , 1988 .

[8]  Stephen L. Morgan,et al.  Parental Networks, Social Closure, and Mathematics Learning: A Test of Coleman's Social Capital Explanation of School Effects , 1999, American Sociological Review.

[9]  R. Burt The contingent value of social capital. , 1997 .

[10]  Lars Backstrom,et al.  Structural diversity in social contagion , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  M. Jackson,et al.  Social Capital and Social Quilts: Network Patterns of Favor Exchange , 2011 .

[12]  Chris Arney,et al.  Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning about a Highly Connected World (Easley, D. and Kleinberg, J.; 2010) [Book Review] , 2013, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[13]  Matthew O. Jackson,et al.  The Formation of Networks with Transfers Among Players , 2004, J. Econ. Theory.

[14]  William J. Carbonaro,et al.  Opening the debate on closure and schooling outcomes: Comment on Morgan and Sørensen , 1999 .

[15]  P. Erdos,et al.  On the evolution of random graphs , 1984 .

[16]  A. Tomolo,et al.  Geographic Localization , 2016, American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality.

[17]  J. Coleman,et al.  High school achievement : public, Catholic, and private schools compared , 1982 .

[18]  J. Moody The Structure of a Social Science Collaboration Network: Disciplinary Cohesion from 1963 to 1999 , 2004 .

[19]  G. Labianca,et al.  Group Social Capital and Group Effectiveness: The Role of Informal Socializing Ties , 2004 .

[20]  Sanjeev Goyal,et al.  Matching and Network Effects , 2006 .

[21]  Mark S. Granovetter Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers , 1974 .

[22]  Mark S. Granovetter Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[23]  Nicolas Carayol,et al.  The strategic formation of inter-individual collaboration networks. Evidence from co-invention patterns , 2007 .

[24]  Stefano Breschi,et al.  Co-invention networks and inventive productivity in US cities , 2016 .

[25]  R. Burt,et al.  Kinds of Third-Party Effects on Trust , 1995 .

[26]  James S. Coleman,et al.  High school achievement , 1982 .

[27]  G. Simmel,et al.  Conflict and the Web of Group Affiliations , 1955 .

[28]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[29]  M. Mobius,et al.  Trust and Social Collateral , 2007 .

[30]  Ismael Gomez-Miguelez,et al.  Singling Out Individual Inventors from Patent Data , 2011 .

[31]  Nicolas Carayol,et al.  Knowledge flows and the geography of networks. A strategic model of small world formation , 2009 .

[32]  Douglas L. Miller,et al.  Robust Inference for Dyadic Data , 2015 .

[33]  Vincent Buskens,et al.  Trust in triads: effects of exit, control, and learning , 2003, Games Econ. Behav..

[34]  Nataša Golubovi,et al.  NETWORK STRUCTURE OF SOCIAL CAPITAL , 2010 .

[35]  Ming-Huei Chen,et al.  The More, the Better? The Impact of Closure Collaboration Network and Network Structures on Technology‐Based New Ventures' Performance , 2016 .

[36]  Nicolas CARAYOL,et al.  de travail Documents de travail « Knowledge flows and the geography of neworks . A strategic model of small worlds formation » , .

[37]  Jasjit Singh,et al.  Collaborative Networks as Determinants of Knowledge Diffusion Patterns , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[38]  Corey C. Phelps,et al.  Interfirm Collaboration Networks: The Impact of Large-Scale Network Structure on Firm Innovation , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[39]  Geoffrey G. Bell,et al.  Benefiting from network position: firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance , 2005 .

[40]  S. Goyal,et al.  Economics: An Emerging Small World , 2004, Journal of Political Economy.

[41]  B. Bollobás The evolution of random graphs , 1984 .

[42]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  'Names Game': Harnessing Inventors Patent Data for Economic Research , 2006 .

[43]  M. Newman 1 Who is the best connected scientist ? A study of scientific coauthorship networks , 2004 .

[44]  Lee Fleming,et al.  Small Worlds and Regional Innovation , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[45]  Brian W. Rogers,et al.  Meeting Strangers and Friends of Friends: How Random are Social Networks? , 2007 .

[46]  David S. Miller,et al.  Cooperation and Collective Enforcement in Networked Societies , 2008 .

[47]  Bryan S. Graham,et al.  Homophily and Transitivity in Dynamic Network Formation , 2016 .

[48]  E. David,et al.  Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning about a Highly Connected World , 2010 .

[49]  Ray Reagans,et al.  Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range , 2003 .

[50]  Michele Pezzoni,et al.  How to kill inventors: testing the Massacrator© algorithm for inventor disambiguation , 2014, Scientometrics.

[51]  Nicolas Carayol,et al.  Who's Who in Patents. A Bayesian approach , 2009 .

[52]  Bryan S. Graham,et al.  Taxing high-income earners: tax avoidance and mobility , 2016 .

[53]  A. Rbnyi ON THE EVOLUTION OF RANDOM GRAPHS , 2001 .

[54]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Don't go it alone: alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology , 2000 .

[55]  Douglas L. Miller,et al.  A Practitioner’s Guide to Cluster-Robust Inference , 2015, The Journal of Human Resources.

[56]  M. Newman,et al.  Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[57]  Jeongsik Jay Lee,et al.  Heterogeneity, Brokerage and Innovative Performance: Endogenous Formation of Collaborative Inventor Networks , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[58]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[59]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[60]  W. Raub,et al.  Reputation and Efficiency in Social Interactions: An Example of Network Effects , 1990, American Journal of Sociology.

[61]  John Hagedoorn,et al.  Information gathering through alliances. , 2008 .

[62]  B. Kogut,et al.  The Small World of Germany and the Durability of National Networks , 2001, American Sociological Review.

[63]  Anatol Rapoport,et al.  Spread of information through a population with socio-structural bias: III. Suggested experimental procedures , 1954 .

[64]  Marcel Fafchamps,et al.  Risk Sharing and Network Formation , 2007 .

[65]  L. Bettencourt,et al.  Invention in the city: Increasing returns to patenting as a scaling function of metropolitan size , 2007 .

[66]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test , 1995 .

[67]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Collaboration and Creativity: The Small World Problem1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[68]  D. Watts Networks, Dynamics, and the Small‐World Phenomenon1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[69]  Z. Griliches The Search for R&D Spillovers , 1991 .

[70]  Downloaded from , 1997 .

[71]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[72]  M. Jackson,et al.  A Strategic Model of Social and Economic Networks , 1996 .

[73]  R. Burt Structural Holes and Good Ideas1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.

[74]  Julio Raffo,et al.  How to play the “Names Game”: Patent retrieval comparing different heuristics , 2009 .

[75]  A. Jaffe Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms&Apos; Patents, Profits and Market Value , 1986 .

[76]  Damon Centola,et al.  The Spread of Behavior in an Online Social Network Experiment , 2010, Science.

[77]  M. E. J. Newman,et al.  A study of scientific coauthorship networks , 2004 .

[78]  F. Heider The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .

[79]  Rafael Wittek,et al.  Structural Holes , 2014, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[80]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[81]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Where Do Small Worlds Come From? , 2003 .

[82]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Non-parametric standard errors and tests for network statistics , 1999 .

[83]  Stefano Breschi,et al.  "Cross-firm" Inventors and Social Networks: Localized Knowledge Spillovers Revisited , 2010 .

[84]  Vetle I. Torvik,et al.  Disambiguation and co-authorship networks of the U.S. patent inventor database (1975–2010) , 2014 .

[85]  T. Newcomb The acquaintance process , 1961 .

[86]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .