Improving the Laboratory Learning Experience: A Process to Train and Manage Teaching Assistants

This paper describes in detail a successful training program developed for sessional (part-time or nonpermanent) laboratory demonstrators employed in the Electrical Engineering Department of an Australian university. Such demonstrators play an important role in teaching practical concepts and skills in engineering. The success of the program relies on a centralized approach coordinated by a carefully selected Laboratory Manager responsible for the recruitment, allocation, training, and development of sessional teachers, and for assessing student satisfaction with them. The paper examines the overall impact of the program on these teachers': 1) introducing laboratory material; 2) preparation; 3) communication; 4) interest in student learning; 5) ability to respond to questions; and 6) overall effectiveness. Sessional teacher satisfaction with the training program is also examined, and the data were used to inform the program's further development. The results show that the training program successfully improved the demonstrators' teaching skills and thus led to greater satisfaction and hence learning experience of both students and demonstrators.

[1]  Kevin Barraclough,et al.  I and i , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  G. Lueddeke,et al.  Training Postgraduates for Teaching: considerations for programme planning and development , 1997 .

[3]  Amy M. Bippus,et al.  Assessment of Graduate Teaching Assistant (GTA) Training: A Case Study of a Training Program and Its Impact on GTAs , 2008 .

[4]  Gillian H. Roehrig,et al.  Graduate Teaching Assistants and Inquiry-Based Instruction: Implications for Graduate Teaching Assistant Training , 2003 .

[5]  Kathleen O'Toole.  Demonstrator development: Preparing for the learning lab , 2012 .

[6]  W. Marsden.  I and J , 2012 .

[7]  Gillian H. Roehrig,et al.  Growing a Garden without Water: Graduate Teaching Assistants in Introductory Science Laboratories at a Doctoral/Research University , 2004 .

[8]  Jason Wells,et al.  Using Video Tutorials as a Carrot-and-Stick Approach to Learning , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[9]  Robert D. Abbott,et al.  Review of Research on TA Training. , 1989 .

[10]  Erin Baumgartner.  A Professional Development Teaching Course for Science Graduate Students: An Innovative Course at the University of Hawaii Provides Future Science Professors with Professional Development in Effective Science Teaching , 2007 .

[11]  Emma I. Näslund-Hadley,et al.  Inquiry-Based Learning , 2010 .

[12]  Phillip C. Wankat,et al.  Educating Engineering Professors in Education , 1999 .

[13]  G. Cole.  Management Theory and Practice , 1979 .

[14]  Nur Riza Mohd Suradi,et al.  Modeling of Engineering Student Satisfaction , 2012 .

[15]  Rafael A. Calvo,et al.  Factors Affecting Students’ Experiences and Satisfaction about Teaching Quality in Engineering , 2010 .

[16]  John W. Rushin,et al.  Graduate Teaching Assistant Training: A Basis for Improvement of College Biology Teaching & Faculty Development? , 1997 .

[17]  Sean McWherter,et al.  The Effects of Teacher and Student Satisfaction on Student Achievement , 2012 .

[18]  Graham Gibbs,et al.  The Impact Of Training Of University Teachers on their Teaching Skills, their Approach to Teaching and the Approach to Learning of their Students , 2004 .

[19]  P. Hughes,et al.  Inquiry-based training improves teaching effectiveness of biology teaching assistants , 2013, PloS one.

[20]  Chris J. Park,et al.  The graduate teaching assistant (GTA): lessons from North American experience , 2004 .

[21]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[22]  Stanislav Karapetrovic,et al.  Tracking Classroom Teaching and Learning: An SPC Application , 2005 .

[23]  Dimple R. Thadani,et al.  In-service Teaching Assistant Training (InsTAT) for engineering and computer science graduate students in Hong Kong: A blended-learning approach , 2011, 2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

[24]  D'Arcy Randall,et al.  An international collaboration to promote inquiry‐based learning in undergraduate engineering classrooms , 2012 .

[25]  Marilla D. Svinicki,et al.  Designing Programs to Prepare TAs to Teach. , 1989 .

[26]  Elizabeth Santhanam,et al.  Enhancing Undergraduate Engineering Education Quality Through Teaching Assistants (Tutors/Demonstrators) , 2012 .

[27]  T. Grady Roberts,et al.  An Analysis of Teaching Competencies of Junior Faculty with Different Levels of Graduate Teaching Assistant Experiences , 2012 .

[28]  Edward W. Ernst,et al.  A New Role for the Undergraduate Engineering Laboratory , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[29]  David M. Shannon,et al.  TA Teaching Effectiveness: The Impact of Training and Teaching Experience , 1998 .

[30]  Walter L. Bateman.  Open to Question: The Art of Teaching and Learning by Inquiry , 1990 .

[31]  Kathleen E. Cook,et al.  Comparing the Effectiveness of an Inverted Classroom to a Traditional Classroom in an Upper-Division Engineering Course , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[32]  Thomas M. Sherman,et al.  The Quest for Excellence in University Teaching , 1987 .

[33]  P. Cochat,et al.  Et al , 2008, Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie.

[34]  Irena Šteblaj.  Inquiry based learning , 2014 .

[35]  Jelena Mitic,et al.  Blended Learning of Programming in the Internet Age , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[36]  R. Felder,et al.  Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education. , 1988 .

[37]  Chong Beng Keok,et al.  Linking transnational engineering students’ satisfactions with perceptions of education quality , 2007, 2007 37th Annual Frontiers In Education Conference - Global Engineering: Knowledge Without Borders, Opportunities Without Passports.