THE DETERMINANTS OF COLLEGE STUDENT PERFORMANCE: THE ROLE OF ASSESSMENT METHOD

Abstract The objective of this research is to explore the potential influence of assessment method on student performance. Specifically, this research uses two semesters of data from a Principles of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness course to identify and quantify determinants of student performance. The focus is how instructor choices of assessment type and method (assignments, quizzes, exams, etc.) can modify learning outcomes in undergraduate economics courses and curricula. The results revealed a large variation of grades across assessment types, and correlations of grades across assessment methods (assignments, quizzes, and exams), ranging from 0.40 to 0.72. Major field of study, student preferences for assignments, and study hours were statistically significant determinants of student performance. Midterm examination grades had a larger impact on final exam performance than either assignment or quiz grades. The study provides some evidence that assessment methods influence student performance. The implications are important and interesting: the selection, administration, and frequency of assessment tools such as assignments, quizzes, and examinations influence how well students learn economic principles. As a result, instructional decisions regarding assessment tools have a significant impact on students’ ability to usefully apply economic fundamentals to better understand agricultural, food, and environmental issues. 1

[1]  Norman D. Aitken.  College Student Performance, Satisfaction and Retention: Specification and Estimation of a Structural Model. , 1982 .

[2]  M. Fuss,et al.  The Determinants of Success in University Introductory Economics Courses , 1994 .

[3]  R. Mayer.  Educational Psychology: A Cognitive Approach , 1987 .

[4]  S. Shapiro,et al.  Personality Type and Student Performance in Principles of Economics , 1996 .

[5]  John J. Siegfried,et al.  Research on Teaching College Economics: A Survey , 1979 .

[6]  Lesley Greer.  Does Changing the Method of Assessment of a Module Improve the Performance of a Student? , 2001 .

[7]  J. Noble,et al.  Accuracy of Self-Reported Course Work and Grade Information of High School Sophomores. , 1991 .

[8]  Myles J. Watts,et al.  (How) Do Prerequisites Matter? Analysis of Intermediate Microeconomics and Agricultural Economics Grades , 2001 .

[9]  H. Walberg,et al.  The Effects of Homework on Learning: A Quantitative Synthesis , 1984 .

[10]  T. Crooks.  The Impact of Classroom Evaluation Practices on Students , 1988 .

[11]  John J. Siegfried,et al.  Sex and the Economics Student , 1977 .

[12]  H. White.  A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity , 1980 .

[13]  G. S. Hanna,et al.  The Impact of Classroom Testing Frequency on High School Students' Achievement. , 1992 .

[14]  James A. Kulik,et al.  Effects of Frequent Classroom Testing. , 1991 .

[15]  Jerry L. Petr,et al.  The Principles Course Revisited , 1971 .

[16]  J. Cassady.  Self-Reported GPA and SAT: A Methodological Note , 2001 .

[17]  S. Devadoss,et al.  Evaluation of Factors Influencing Student Class Attendance and Performance , 1996 .

[18]  B. Greene,et al.  Verbal Abilities, Gender, and the Introductory Economics Course: A New Look at an Old Assumption , 1997 .

[19]  The Future of Teaching Undergraduate Agricultural Economics: Lifelong Learning in an Era of Rapid Technological Change , 2001 .

[20]  Bruce W. Tuckman,et al.  The Relative Effectiveness of Incentive Motivation and Prescribed Learning Strategy in Improving College Students' Course Performance. , 1996 .

[21]  Bruce W. Tuckman,et al.  Using tests as an incentive to motivate procrastinators to study , 1998 .