Measuring the critical band for speech.

The current experiments were designed to measure the frequency resolution employed by listeners during the perception of everyday sentences. Speech bands having nearly vertical filter slopes and narrow bandwidths were sharply partitioned into various numbers of equal log- or ERBN-width subbands. The temporal envelope from each partition was used to amplitude modulate a corresponding band of low-noise noise, and the modulated carriers were combined and presented to normal-hearing listeners. Intelligibility increased and reached asymptote as the number of partitions increased. In the mid- and high-frequency regions of the speech spectrum, the partition bandwidth corresponding to asymptotic performance matched current estimates of psychophysical tuning across a number of conditions. These results indicate that, in these regions, the critical band for speech matches the critical band measured using traditional psychoacoustic methods and nonspeech stimuli. However, in the low-frequency region, partition bandwidths at asymptote were somewhat narrower than would be predicted based upon psychophysical tuning. It is concluded that, overall, current estimates of psychophysical tuning represent reasonably well the ability of listeners to extract spectral detail from running speech.

[1]  Brian R Glasberg,et al.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data , 1990, Hearing Research.

[2]  C. Turner,et al.  The relation between vowel recognition and measures of frequency resolution. , 1989, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[3]  Eric W Healy,et al.  The role of contrasting temporal amplitude patterns in the perception of speech. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  R. Patterson Auditory filter shapes derived with noise stimuli. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  J R Dubno,et al.  Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Jon Pumplin,et al.  Low‐noise noise , 1985 .

[7]  R. M. Warren,et al.  Intelligibility of 1/3-octave speech: greater contribution of frequencies outside than inside the nominal passband. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  R V Shannon,et al.  Speech Recognition with Primarily Temporal Cues , 1995, Science.

[9]  W A Yost,et al.  Across-critical-band processing of amplitude-modulated tones. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Andrew J. Oxenham,et al.  Detection of tones in low-noise noise : further evidence for the role of envelope fluctuations , 1997 .

[11]  R. M. Warren,et al.  Spectral redundancy: Intelligibility of sentences heard through narrow spectral slits , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  B. Moore,et al.  Effects of spectral smearing on the intelligibility of sentences in noise , 1993 .

[13]  Richard M Warren,et al.  Intelligibility of bandpass filtered speech: steepness of slopes required to eliminate transition band contributions. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  R. Plomp,et al.  Effect of spectral envelope smearing on speech reception. II. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  D J Van Tasell,et al.  Tone detection and synthetic speech discrimination in band-reject noise by hearing-impaired listeners. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  M F Dorman,et al.  The recognition of sentences in noise by normal-hearing listeners using simulations of cochlear-implant signal processors with 6-20 channels. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  B. Moore An introduction to the psychology of hearing, 3rd ed. , 1989 .

[18]  D D Dirks,et al.  Auditory filter characteristics and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired listeners. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Robert D. Celmer,et al.  Critical Bands in the Perception of Speech Signals by Normal and Sensorineural Hearing Loss Listeners , 1987 .

[20]  Brian C. J. Moore,et al.  Relationship between Psychophysical Abilities and Speech Perception for Subjects with Unilateral and Bilateral Cochlear Hearing Impairments , 1987 .

[21]  S. R. Silverman,et al.  Hearing and deafness , 1970 .

[22]  S. Soli,et al.  Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  W M Hartmann,et al.  Noise power fluctuations and the masking of sine signals. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.