Susceptibility to anchoring effects: How openness-to-experience influences responses to anchoring cues

Previous research on anchoring has shown this heuristic to be a very robust psychological phenomenon ubiquitous across many domains of human judgment and decision-making. Despite the prevalence of anchoring effects, researchers have only recently begun to investigate the underlying factors responsible for how and in what ways a person is susceptible to them. This paper examines how one such factor, the Big-Five personality trait of openness-to-experience, influences the effect of previously presented anchors on participants’ judgments. Our findings indicate that participants high in openness-to-experience were significantly more influenced by anchoring cues relative to participants low in this trait. These findings were consistent across two different types of anchoring tasks providing convergent evidence for our hypothesis.

[1]  I. Levin,et al.  A New Look at Framing Effects: Distribution of Effect Sizes, Individual Differences, and Independence of Types of Effects , 2002 .

[2]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[3]  J. Baron,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES www.elsevier.com/locate/obhdp Omission bias, individual differences, and normality , 2003 .

[4]  Andrew F. Simon,et al.  Decision framing: moderating effects of individual differences and cognitive processing , 2004 .

[5]  Jerry Suls,et al.  Self-, other-, and ideal-judgments of risk and caution as a function of the five-factor model of personality , 2000 .

[6]  S. Plous,et al.  Thinking the Unthinkable : The Effects of Anchoring on Likelihood Estimates of Nuclear Warl , 1989 .

[7]  I. Levin,et al.  Relating individual differences in attitude toward ambiguity to risky choices , 2001 .

[8]  P. Costa,et al.  Conceptions and correlates of openness to experience. , 1997 .

[9]  S. Gosling,et al.  A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains , 2003 .

[10]  M. Bazerman,et al.  Cognition and Rationality in Negotiation , 1991 .

[11]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Anchoring, Activation, and the Construction of Values. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[12]  P. Costa,et al.  The five-factor theory of personality. , 2008 .

[13]  Irwin P. Levin,et al.  Risk preferences in young children: early evidence of individual differences in reaction to potential gains and losses , 2003 .

[14]  P. Slovic,et al.  Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions. , 1971 .

[15]  I. Levin,et al.  Personality traits and risky decision-making in a controlled experimental task: An exploratory study. , 2001 .

[16]  R. Buehler,et al.  Planning, personality, and prediction: The role of future focus in optimistic time predictions☆ , 2003 .

[17]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  A new look at anchoring effects: basic anchoring and its antecedents. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[18]  I. Ritov,et al.  Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes Anchoring in Simulated Competitive Market Negotiation , 2022 .

[19]  Ravi Dhar,et al.  Coping with Ambivalence: The Effect of Removing a Neutral Option on Consumer Attitude and Preference Judgments , 2002 .

[20]  Brian H. Bornstein,et al.  The More You Ask For, the More You Get: Anchoring in Personal Injury Verdicts , 1996 .

[21]  D. Cervone,et al.  Anchoring, Efficacy and Action: The Influence of Judgmental Heuristics on Self-Efficacy Judgments a , 1986 .

[22]  G. Northcraft,et al.  Experts, amateurs, and real estate: An anchoring-and-adjustment perspective on property pricing decisions , 1987 .

[23]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Heuristics and Biases: Individual Differences in Reasoning: Implications for the Rationality Debate? , 2002 .

[24]  William F. Wright,et al.  Effects of situation familiarity and financial incentives on use of the anchoring and adjustment heuristic for probability assessment , 1989 .

[25]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Measures of Anchoring in Estimation Tasks , 1995 .

[26]  O. John.  The "Big Five" factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. , 1990 .

[27]  C. K. Mertz,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Numeracy and Decision Making , 2022 .

[28]  John A. Johnson,et al.  Handbook of personality psychology. , 1997 .

[29]  Daniel M. Bartels,et al.  Proportion Dominance: The Generality and Variability of Favoring Relative Savings Over Absolute Savings , 2006 .

[30]  Keith E. Stanovich,et al.  Individual differences in rational thought. , 1998 .

[31]  Todd McElroy,et al.  Framing effects: An analytic–holistic perspective ☆ , 2003 .

[32]  P. Costa,et al.  Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.