Performance study on a novel variable area robotic fin

Abstract Fish fin possesses large deformations in its motion cycle assisting fish's swimming, in which its geometric parameters such as surface area, aspect ratio change greatly, and the complex deformations and motions result in complicated hydrodynamic response. In this paper, the dynamic change of surface area is concentrated to improve the propulsion performance of underwater propeller. A novel variable area robotic fin is developed and the effect of surface area change on the hydrodynamic forces is investigated quantitatively. The robotic fin composes two parts: a base fin with hand shaped holes and a cover fin that fits the shape of the holes. The change of the surface area of the robotic fin is realized by rotating the cover fin to shield the holes in the base fin. A crank-rocker-cam composite mechanism is designed to realize the fin pitching motion and surface change motion synchronously with one driving motor. Four control modes of surface area change in a motion circle are investigated, namely, complete traditional invariable fin, traditional invariable fin with smaller surface, fin with larger surface during in-strokes and fin with larger surface during out-strokes. The thrust force and efficiency of the four control modes with various swimming speeds are detailed experimented and discussed. It is found that the variable area fin achieves a remarkable different hydrodynamic response and the corresponding control modes affect much. For the variable surface area fin, they generate average thrust force between the complete invariable fin and invariable fin with smaller surface, in which the fin with larger surface area during in-strokes follows closely the complete traditional invariable fin, while the fin with larger surface area during out-strokes performs more like the traditional invariable fin with smaller surface. It is interesting that fin with larger surface during in-strokes can generate much larger average thrust force than the fin with large surface during out-strokes. For the efficiency, the fin with larger surface during in-strokes behaves the best. And the effect of the surface area change ratio and time is closely connected with the control modes. Besides, the influences of pitching frequency and amplitude are also studied. The results demonstrate that the propulsive performance can be indeed improved by proper surface area change in a motion cycle, which will be an inspiration to the design of novel underwater robot propulsive system.

[1]  C. C. Lindsey 1 - Form, Function, and Locomotory Habits in Fish , 1978 .

[2]  Haibo Dong,et al.  Locomotion with flexible propulsors: I. Experimental analysis of pectoral fin swimming in sunfish , 2006, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[3]  M. Westneat,et al.  Functional morphology of undulatory pectoral fin locomotion in the stingray taeniura lymma (Chondrichthyes: dasyatidae) , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[4]  Christopher J. Esposito,et al.  A robotic fish caudal fin: effects of stiffness and motor program on locomotor performance , 2012, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[5]  Jing Qiu,et al.  Kinematics Modeling and Experiments of Pectoral Oscillation Propulsion Robotic Fish , 2009 .

[6]  M. Lighthill Large-amplitude elongated-body theory of fish locomotion , 1971, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[7]  George V. Lauder,et al.  Low-dimensional models and performance scaling of a highly deformable fish pectoral fin , 2009, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[8]  K H Low,et al.  Parametric study of the swimming performance of a fish robot propelled by a flexible caudal fin , 2010, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[9]  James Tangorra,et al.  Fish biorobotics: kinematics and hydrodynamics of self-propulsion , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[10]  Rajat Mittal,et al.  The effect of fin ray flexural rigidity on the propulsive forces generated by a biorobotic fish pectoral fin , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[11]  Yin Xie-zhen,et al.  Measurements and analysis of force and moment of caudal fin model in C-start , 2006 .

[12]  Jianxun Wang,et al.  A dynamic model for tail-actuated robotic fish with drag coefficient adaptation , 2013 .

[13]  L. Rosenberger,et al.  Pectoral fin locomotion in batoid fishes: undulation versus oscillation. , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[14]  Kin Huat Low,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Kinematics Analysis of a Koi Carp Pectoral Fin by Digital Image Processing , 2013 .

[15]  Jong-Oh Park,et al.  Swimming microrobot actuated by two pairs of Helmholtz coils system , 2011 .

[16]  K. H. Low,et al.  Modelling and parametric study of modular undulating fin rays for fish robots , 2009 .

[17]  G. Lauder,et al.  Caudal fin shape modulation and control during acceleration, braking and backing maneuvers in bluegill sunfish, Lepomis macrochirus , 2009, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[18]  Paul W. Webb,et al.  Stability and Maneuverability , 2005 .

[19]  Jie Yang,et al.  A Novel Implementation of a Flexible Robotic Fin Actuated by Shape Memory Alloy , 2012 .

[20]  Qin Yan,et al.  Design and Implementation of a Lightweight Bioinspired Pectoral Fin Driven by SMA , 2014, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[21]  J.A. Walker,et al.  Structure, function, and neural control of pectoral fins in fishes , 2004, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[22]  Christopher J. Esposito,et al.  Use of biorobotic models of highly deformable fins for studying the mechanics and control of fin forces in fishes. , 2011, Integrative and comparative biology.

[23]  T. Y. Wu,et al.  Hydromechanics of swimming propulsion. Part 1. Swimming of a two-dimensional flexible plate at variable forward speeds in an inviscid fluid , 1971, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[24]  M. Westneat,et al.  Diversity of pectoral fin structure and function in fishes with labriform propulsion , 2005, Journal of morphology.

[25]  Michael Sfakiotakis,et al.  Review of fish swimming modes for aquatic locomotion , 1999 .

[26]  Maurizio Porfiri,et al.  Controlling a robotic fish with a smart phone , 2013 .