A language technology toolset for development of a large group augmented facilitation system

This paper explains a conceptual framework on how technology and the facilitation processes can be melded to support effective interaction in large, distributed groups of 50 to 5000 individuals. We provide an approach for the development of a complete system to augment the human facilitator. This system would first scan inputs for inconsistencies with the rules then engage the participant in an activity to modify the input to be consistent with the TSF ground rules. Then the inputs are clustered with similar inputs and automatically summarized for the group and the facilitator. At this point group members can continue to contribute to the clusters, which are continuously re-summarized and distributed to the group. Meanwhile, the facilitator is developing a dynamic document of the groups' interactions, behavior, progress and potential conclusions. As the meeting progresses the facilitator will modify processes to focus the group toward reaching conclusions on the cluster summaries. As with small, face-to-face meetings, the goal is to enable the group to reach a decision with appropriate or required levels of commitment from the group members. The functional elements of technology are currently available and have been integrated into robust systems for other applications. Adapting these functional components to a different domain such as group facilitation is feasible with a limited investment.

[1]  F. Ackermann Participants' perceptions on the role of facilitators using Group Decision Support Systems , 1996 .

[2]  N. Maier Assets and liabilities in group problem solving: the need for an integrative function. , 1967, Psychological review.

[3]  Roger M. Schwarz,et al.  The skilled facilitator : practical wisdom for developing effective groups , 1994 .

[4]  Chris Argyris,et al.  Knowledge for Action: A Guide to Overcoming Barriers to Organizational Change , 1993 .

[5]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  StrikeCOM: A Multi-Player Online Strategy Game for Researching and Teaching Group Dynamics , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[6]  C. Argyris Intervention theory and method : a behavioral science view. , 1970 .

[7]  F. Ackermann Participants' perceptions on the role of facilitators using Group Decision Support Systems , 1996 .

[8]  Mark Alan Aakhus The communication logics of computer-supported facilitative interventions : a study of the community of practice and social technologies surrounding the use of group decision support systems in process facilitation , 1997 .

[9]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Embedding facilitation in group support systems to manage distributed group behavior , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[10]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Collaboration Engineering with ThinkLets to Pursue Sustained Success with Group Support Systems , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[11]  C. Argyris Strategy, change, and defensive routines , 1985 .

[12]  M. Adkins,et al.  Embedded facilitation requirements using The Skilled Facilitator approach: with and across time and space , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[13]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method, and Practice , 1995 .

[14]  W. Bennis,et al.  A Theory of Group Development , 1956 .

[15]  Chris Argyris,et al.  Reasoning, learning, and action , 1982 .

[16]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Advances in automated deception detection in text-based computer-mediated communication , 2004, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[17]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Increasing Intellectual Bandwidth: Generating Value from Intellectual Capital with Information Technology , 2002 .

[18]  J. Valacich,et al.  Group Support Systems: New Perspectives , 1992 .

[19]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Experiences developing a virtual environment to support disaster relief with the United States Navy's Commander Third Fleet , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[20]  Arthur B. VanGundy,et al.  Techniques of structured problem solving , 1981 .

[21]  Massimo Marraffa,et al.  Organizational learning II: Theory, method and practice , 1998 .

[22]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  A Technology Transition Model Derived from Field Investigation of GSS Use About the U , 1998 .

[23]  John R. Carlson,et al.  Deception in Computer-Mediated Communication , 2004 .

[24]  Bradley E. Wright,et al.  Evaluating the Strengths and Weaknesses of Group Decision-making Processes : A Competing Values Approach , 1999 .

[25]  Dale E. Brashers,et al.  The Power of Language in Computer-Mediated Groups , 1995 .

[26]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Using group support systems for strategic planning with the United States Air Force , 2003, Decis. Support Syst..

[27]  Dennis S. Gouran,et al.  Facilitation of Group Communication , 1989 .

[28]  Mark Adkins,et al.  Ubiquitous computing: omnipresent technology in support of Network Centric Warfare , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[29]  R. Schwarz The Skilled Facilitator: A Comprehensive Resource for Consultants, Facilitators, Managers, Trainers, and Coaches , 1994 .

[30]  Mark Adkins,et al.  Information technology augmentation of the skilled facilitator approach , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[31]  Henk Sol,et al.  Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , 1997, HICSS 2015.

[32]  Milam W. Aiken,et al.  Automated facilitation of electronic meetings , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[33]  Chris Argyris,et al.  Overcoming organizational defenses : facilitating organizational learning , 1990 .

[34]  Norman R. F. Maier,et al.  An experimental test of the effects of "developmental" vs. "free" discussions on the quality of group decisions. , 1957 .