Normalized least-square method for water hold-up measurement in stratified oil–water flow

Abstract In this paper, a novel conductance sensor array is proposed for water hold-up measurement in horizontal oil wells of low liquid production of oil and water. The array consists of 24 needle-like electrodes that are mounted on 12 supporting arms arising from the central shaft, and it works within a well. As the value of water hold-up uniquely relates to the level of the oil–water interface, the measurement of water hold-up is transformed into the evaluation of the level of the oil–water interface. By numerical calculation, the variation of the conductance between each electrode and the ground with the level of oil–water interface and the proportional relationship between the conductance and water conductivity are obtained. Then the level of the oil–water interface is estimated by utilizing the 24 values of conductance between the 24 electrodes and the ground. First, whether the level of oil–water interface exceeds the lower limit of level estimation is judged by a coarse estimate. Second, the 24 values of conductance are normalized to eliminate the impact of water conductivity on the level estimation. Then, the least-square (LS) method is applied to match the measurement data with the sample data obtained from static experiments in advance. Experimental results show that both the water hold-up and the azimuth angle of the conductance sensor array can be estimated accurately by using the normalized LS method if the water hold-up exceeds a certain value.

[1]  牛刚,et al.  Void Fraction Measurement in Oil-Gas Transportation Pipeline Using an Improved Electrical Capacitance Tomography System , 2004 .

[2]  Gary James Frisch,et al.  Integrating Wellbore Flow Images with a Conventional Production Log Interpretation Method , 2002 .

[3]  G. Lucas,et al.  Simulation of a local four-sensor conductance probe using a rotating dual-sensor probe , 2007 .

[4]  Feng Dong,et al.  Conductance probe for the measurement of liquid volume fraction and axial velocity in gas-liquid two phase flow , 2009, 2009 9th International Conference on Electronic Measurement & Instruments.

[5]  Ion Tiseanu,et al.  Comparison between wire-mesh sensor and ultra-fast X-ray tomograph for an air–water flow in a vertical pipe , 2005 .

[6]  Gary Lucas,et al.  Use of a novel dual-sensor probe array and electrical resistance tomography for characterization of the mean and time-dependent properties of inclined, bubbly oil-in-water pipe flows , 2011 .

[7]  Chris Lenn,et al.  Flow Diagnosis in an Extended Reach Well at the Wytch Farm Oilfield Using a New Toolstring Combination Incorporating Novel Production Technology , 1996 .

[8]  Rakesh Mishra,et al.  Measurement of bubble velocity components in a swirling gas–liquid pipe flow using a local four-sensor conductance probe , 2005 .

[9]  H. H. Bruun,et al.  An optical probe for measurements in liquid - liquid two-phase flow , 1997 .

[10]  A. Vittachi,et al.  The Application of a New Radial Borehole Fluid Imaging Tool in Production Logging Highly Deviated Wells , 1996 .

[11]  F. Avellan,et al.  A scattering light probe for the measurement of oceanic air bubble sizes , 1983 .

[12]  Xiaodong Jia,et al.  Industrial Monitoring of Hydrocyclone Operation using Electrical Resistance Tomography , 1999 .

[13]  C. Snoek.  A selection of new developments in multiphase flow measurement techniques , 1990 .

[14]  J. M. Burgess,et al.  The measurement of bubble parameters in two-phase dispersions—I: The development of an improved probe technique , 1975 .

[15]  H. Prasser,et al.  A new electrode-mesh tomograph for gas–liquid flows , 1998 .

[16]  K. Spindler,et al.  An experimental study of the void fraction distribution in adiabatic water-air two-phase flows in an inclined tube , 1999 .

[17]  Wim Dewulf,et al.  A test object with parallel grooves for calibration and accuracy assessment of industrial CT metrology , 2011 .

[18]  Synnove H. Eriksen,et al.  Gas Holdup Imaging Identifies Complex Gas-Liquid Flow Regimes and Introduces a New Velocity Measurement In a Long, Cased Hole, Horizontal, Production Well , 2003 .

[19]  H. Prasser,et al.  Bubble size measurement using wire-mesh sensors , 2001 .

[20]  Xingbin Liu,et al.  A theoretical model for a capacitance tool and its application to production logging , 1998 .

[21]  A dual optical probe for volume fraction, drop velocity and drop size measurements in liquid-liquid two-phase flow , 2000 .

[22]  S. G. Bankoff,et al.  A high resolution resistivity probe for determination of local void properties in gas‐liquid flow , 1963 .

[23]  Allen R. Young,et al.  A New Production Logging Tool for Determining Holdups , 1997 .

[24]  Li Xingbin,et al.  Design and performance of a six-electrode conductance probe for measuring the water fraction in oil-in-water pipe flow , 2007, 2007 8th International Conference on Electronic Measurement and Instruments.

[25]  Mamoru Ishii,et al.  Theory and measurement of local interfacial area using a four sensor probe in two-phase flow , 1993 .

[26]  Isao Kataoka,et al.  Turbulence structure of air-water bubbly flow—I. measuring techniques , 1975 .

[27]  Barry J. Azzopardi,et al.  Comparison between Electrical Capacitance Tomography and Wire Mesh Sensor Output for Air/Silicone Oil Flow in a Vertical Pipe , 2010 .

[28]  Jan-Erik Nordtvedt,et al.  A new reconstruction algorithm for process tomography , 1993 .

[29]  Huaxiang Wang,et al.  Identification of two-phase flow regimes based on support vector machine and electrical capacitance tomography , 2009 .