FINITE ELEMENT MODEL UPDATING OF ROTATING STRUCTURES USING DIFFERENT OPTIMISATION TECHNIQUES

This paper is concerned with finite element model updating of rotating structures using measured vibration test data. The use of both deterministic and stochastic optimisation techniques was investigated in order to minimise the difference between the measured and analytical data. First, a theoretical basis was developed for frequency response functions (FRFs) updating techniques. The standard linear least-square (LLS) formulation was applied to the FRF updating formulation where the element mass, damping, gyroscopic and stiffness matrices are corrected by using a single multiplier, the so-called p-value. A new residue was then proposed and formulated to improve the convergence rate of the FRF-based model updating in the presence of noise. Next, two well-known stochastic optimisation methods that require no gradient and can achieve a global optimal solution in solving non-smooth and highly non-linear optimisation problems, namely genetic algorithm (GA) and adaptive simulated annealing (ASA), were introduced and implemented to the developed rotating structure code. The findings were illustrated in the case of a test rotor and the advantages and disadvantages of the proposed techniques were discussed in some detail.

[1]  Donald Geman,et al.  Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images , 1984 .

[2]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[3]  Lester Ingber,et al.  Simulated annealing: Practice versus theory , 1993 .

[4]  H. G. Natke Updating computational models in the frequency domain based on measured data: a survey , 1988 .

[5]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  Model Updating In Structural Dynamics: A Survey , 1993 .

[6]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[7]  Saeed. Ziaei Rad,et al.  Methods of updating numerical models in structural dynamics. , 1997 .

[8]  Lawrence. Davis,et al.  Handbook Of Genetic Algorithms , 1990 .

[9]  Paul Sas,et al.  Model updating using experimental frequency response functions: case studies , 1993 .

[10]  Donald Geman,et al.  Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions, and the Bayesian Restoration of Images , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[11]  Zbigniew Michalewicz,et al.  Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs , 1996, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[12]  Paul Sas,et al.  Model updating based on forced vibration testing using numerical stable formulations , 1992 .

[13]  Emile H. L. Aarts,et al.  Simulated Annealing: Theory and Applications , 1987, Mathematics and Its Applications.

[14]  Zbigniew Michalewicz,et al.  Genetic Algorithms Plus Data Structures Equals Evolution Programs , 1994 .

[15]  Bruce E. Rosen,et al.  Genetic Algorithms and Very Fast Simulated Reannealing: A comparison , 1992 .

[16]  Sheng Chen,et al.  Application of adaptive simulated annealing to blind channel identification with HOC fitting , 1998 .

[17]  Nicholas A J Lieven,et al.  DYNAMIC FINITE ELEMENT MODEL UPDATING USING SIMULATED ANNEALING AND GENETIC ALGORITHMS , 1997 .

[18]  Sandro Ridella,et al.  Minimizing multimodal functions of continuous variables with the “simulated annealing” algorithmCorrigenda for this article is available here , 1987, TOMS.

[19]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[20]  N. Metropolis,et al.  Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines , 1953, Resonance.

[21]  M. Imregun,et al.  ON THE ACCURACY REQUIRED OF EXPERIMENTAL DATA FOR FINITE ELEMENT MODEL UPDATING , 1996 .