An Industrial-Grade Brain Imaging-Based Deep Learning Classifier

Abstract Beyond detecting brain damage or tumors with magnetic resonance brain imaging, little success has been attained on identifying individual differences, e.g., sex or brain disorders. The current study aims to build an industrial-grade brain imaging-based classifier to infer individual differences using deep learning/transfer learning on big data. We pooled 34 datasets to constitute the largest brain magnetic resonance image sample to date (85,721 samples from 50,876 participants), and then applied a state-of-the-art deep convolutional neural network, Inception-ResNet-V2, to build an industrial-grade sex classifier. We achieved 94.9% accuracy in cross-dataset-validation, i.e., the model can classify the sex of a participant with brain structural imaging data from anybody and any scanner with about 95% accuracy. We then explored the potential of a deep convolutional network to objectively diagnose brain disorders. Using transfer learning, the model fine-tuned to Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) achieved 88.4% accuracy in leave-sites-out five-fold cross-validation on the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) dataset and 86.1% accuracy for a direct test on an unseen independent dataset (OASIS). When directly testing this AD classifier on brain images of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) patients, 64.2% who finally converted into AD were predicted as AD, versus 25.9% who did not convert into AD (during the ADNI data collection period, but might convert in the future) were predicted as AD. The AD classifier also achieved high specificity in direct testing on other brain disorder datasets. Occlusion tests showed that hypothalamus, superior vermis, thalamus, amygdala and limbic system areas played critical roles in predicting sex, and hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, putamen and insula were crucial for predicting AD. Finally, the transfer learning framework failed to achieve practical accuracy for psychiatric disorders, which remain open questions for future studies. We openly shared our preprocessed data, trained model, code and framework, as well as built an online predicting website (http://brainimagenet.org:8088) for whomever is interested in testing our classifier with brain imaging data from anybody and from any scanner.

[1]  Daniel S. Kermany,et al.  Identifying Medical Diagnoses and Treatable Diseases by Image-Based Deep Learning , 2018, Cell.

[2]  Chao Zhang,et al.  Functional connectivity predicts gender: Evidence for gender differences in resting brain connectivity , 2018, Human brain mapping.

[3]  Yurong Liu,et al.  A survey of deep neural network architectures and their applications , 2017, Neurocomputing.

[4]  I. Veer,et al.  Strongly reduced volumes of putamen and thalamus in Alzheimer's disease: an MRI study , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  L. Katz,et al.  Sex differences in the functional organization of the brain for language , 1995, Nature.

[6]  Andrew T. Drysdale,et al.  Resting-state connectivity biomarkers define neurophysiological subtypes of depression , 2016, Nature Medicine.

[7]  David S. Melnick,et al.  International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening , 2020, Nature.

[8]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Early brain development in infants at high risk for autism spectrum disorder , 2017, Nature.

[9]  Satrajit S. Ghosh,et al.  FMRIPrep: a robust preprocessing pipeline for functional MRI , 2018, bioRxiv.

[10]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Functional neuroimaging of high-risk 6-month-old infants predicts a diagnosis of autism at 24 months of age , 2017, Science Translational Medicine.

[11]  H. Braak,et al.  Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes , 2004, Acta Neuropathologica.

[12]  Qiang Yang,et al.  A Survey on Transfer Learning , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[13]  A. Arnold The end of gonad-centric sex determination in mammals. , 2012, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[14]  Karolinska Schizophrenia,et al.  Common brain disorders are associated with heritable patterns of apparent aging of the brain , 2019 .

[15]  Daniel S. Margulies,et al.  Sex beyond the genitalia: The human brain mosaic , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Edward Challis,et al.  Gaussian process classification of Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment from resting-state fMRI , 2015, NeuroImage.

[17]  Nick C Fox,et al.  The clinical use of structural MRI in Alzheimer disease , 2010, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[18]  André J. W. van der Kouwe,et al.  Volumetric parcellation methodology of the human hypothalamus in neuroimaging: Normative data and sex differences , 2013, NeuroImage.

[19]  A. Fagan,et al.  Multimodal techniques for diagnosis and prognosis of Alzheimer's disease , 2009, Nature.

[20]  Jeong-Hwan Kim,et al.  Deep learning for multi-year ENSO forecasts , 2019, Nature.

[21]  Chenping Hou,et al.  Gender Identification of Human Cortical 3-D Morphology Using Hierarchical Sparsity , 2019, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[22]  John G. Csernansky,et al.  Open Access Series of Imaging Studies: Longitudinal MRI Data in Nondemented and Demented Older Adults , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  O. Abe,et al.  Diffeomorphic Anatomical Registration Through Exponentiated Lie Algebra provides reduced effect of scanner for cortex volumetry with atlas-based method in healthy subjects , 2013, Neuroradiology.

[24]  M. Forest,et al.  HYPOTHALAMIC‐PITUITARY‐GONADAL RELATIONSHIPS IN MAN FROM BIRTH TO PUBERTY , 1976, Clinical endocrinology.

[25]  Yufeng Zang,et al.  DPARSF: A MATLAB Toolbox for “Pipeline” Data Analysis of Resting-State fMRI , 2010 .

[26]  Xi-Nian Zuo,et al.  Spatial Topography of Individual-Specific Cortical Networks Predicts Human Cognition, Personality, and Emotion. , 2019, Cerebral cortex.

[27]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[28]  Chaogan Yan,et al.  DPARSF: A MATLAB Toolbox for “Pipeline” Data Analysis of Resting-State fMRI , 2010, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[29]  Daniel S. Margulies,et al.  The Neuro Bureau ADHD-200 Preprocessed repository , 2016, NeuroImage.

[30]  J. Becker Gender Differences in Dopaminergic Function in Striatum and Nucleus Accumbens , 1999, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[31]  Sebastian Thrun,et al.  Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks , 2017, Nature.

[32]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A Voxel-Based Morphometric Study of Ageing in 465 Normal Adult Human Brains , 2001, NeuroImage.

[33]  David C Van Essen,et al.  The impact of traditional neuroimaging methods on the spatial localization of cortical areas , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  M. Weissman,et al.  Brain Regulation of Emotional Conflict Predicts Antidepressant Treatment Response for Depression , 2019, Nature Human Behaviour.

[35]  John G. Csernansky,et al.  Open Access Series of Imaging Studies (OASIS): Cross-sectional MRI Data in Young, Middle Aged, Nondemented, and Demented Older Adults , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  H. Stefánsson,et al.  Brain age prediction using deep learning uncovers associated sequence variants , 2019, Nature Communications.

[37]  R. Petersen,et al.  Mild cognitive impairment , 2006, The Lancet.

[38]  K. Boström,et al.  Which instruments to support diagnosis of depression have sufficient accuracy? A systematic review , 2015, Nordic journal of psychiatry.

[39]  F. Viégas,et al.  Deep learning of aftershock patterns following large earthquakes , 2018, Nature.

[40]  Mert R. Sabuncu,et al.  Deep neural networks and kernel regression achieve comparable accuracies for functional connectivity prediction of behavior and demographics , 2020, NeuroImage.