On Folding and Twisting (and whatknot): towards a characterization of workspaces in syntax.

Syntactic theory has traditionally adopted a constructivist approach, in which a set of atomic elements are manipulated by combinatory operations to yield derived, complex elements. Syntactic structure is thus seen as the result or discrete recursive combinatorics over lexical items which get assembled into phrases, which are themselves combined to form sentences. This view is common to European and American structuralism (e.g., Benveniste, 1971; Hockett, 1958) and different incarnations of generative grammar, transformational and non-transformational (Chomsky, 1956, 1995; and Kaplan & Bresnan, 1982; Gazdar, 1982). Since at least Uriagereka (2002), there has been some attention paid to the fact that syntactic operations must apply somewhere, particularly when copying and movement operations are considered. Contemporary syntactic theory has thus somewhat acknowledged the importance of formalizing aspects of the spaces in which elements are manipulated, but it is still a vastly underexplored area. In this paper we explore the consequences of conceptualizing syntax as a set of topological operations applying over spaces rather than over discrete elements. We argue that there are empirical advantages in such a view for the treatment of long-distance dependencies and cross-derivational dependencies: constraints on possible configurations emerge from the dynamics of the system.

[1]  Marcus Kracht,et al.  Syntax in Chains , 2001 .

[2]  Jeffrey Watumull,et al.  A Turing Program for Linguistic Theory , 2012, Biolinguistics.

[3]  E. Spanier,et al.  Set theory and metric spaces , 1955 .

[4]  D. P. Medeiros ULTRA: Universal Grammar as a Universal Parser , 2018, Front. Psychol..

[5]  James D. McCawley,et al.  CONCERNING THE BASE COMPONENT OF A TRANSFORMATIONAL GRAMMAR , 2016 .

[6]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Problems of projection , 2013 .

[7]  Gary S. Dell,et al.  Connectionist models of language production: lexical access and grammatical encoding , 1999, Cogn. Sci..

[8]  R. Levine Right node (non-)raising , 1985 .

[9]  Mary A. Kato,et al.  Linearization of Chains and Sideward Movement , 2004 .

[10]  Aravind K. Joshi,et al.  Parsing Tree Adjoining Grammars , 1989, A Perspective in Theoretical Computer Science.

[11]  E. Klima,et al.  Rules for English Pronominalization , 1963 .

[12]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Evolution of Human Language: Some simple evo devo theses: how true might they be for language? , 2010 .

[13]  Doug Saddy Syntax and uncertainty , 2018 .

[14]  L. Rizzi Labeling, maximality and the head – phrase distinction , 2016 .

[15]  M. Lackenby A polynomial upper bound on Reidemeister moves , 2013, 1302.0180.

[16]  Robert Frank,et al.  Phrase Structure Composition and Syntactic Dependencies , 2002, Computational Linguistics.

[17]  Pablo Varona,et al.  Chunking dynamics: heteroclinics in mind , 2014, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[18]  Joost Zwarts Vectors across Spatial Domains: From Place to Size, Orientation, Shape, and Parts , 2003 .

[19]  P. Postal On So-Called “Pronouns” in English , 2013 .

[20]  Geoffrey Sampson,et al.  The single mother condition , 1975, Journal of Linguistics.

[21]  David R. Dowty,et al.  Natural Language Parsing , 2005 .

[22]  John von Neumann,et al.  First draft of a report on the EDVAC , 1993, IEEE Annals of the History of Computing.

[23]  William J. Idsardi,et al.  Three types of linearization and the temporal aspects of speech , 2008 .

[24]  Vibhu Chinmay,et al.  NATURAL LANGUAGES AND THE CHOMSKY HIERARCHY , 2015 .

[25]  Richard S. Kayne Connectedness and binary branching , 1984 .

[26]  Kathryn Fraughnaugh,et al.  Introduction to graph theory , 1973, Mathematical Gazette.

[27]  Nobue Mori A Syntactic Structure of Lexical Verbs , 2005 .

[28]  David R. Dowty,et al.  Natural language parsing: Contributors , 1985 .

[29]  Thomas S. Stroik,et al.  Locality in Minimalist Syntax , 2009 .

[30]  Cheng-Teh James Huang,et al.  Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar , 1998 .

[31]  G. Toulouse,et al.  Ultrametricity for physicists , 1986 .

[32]  K. Sakai Geometric Aspects of General Topology , 2013 .

[33]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[34]  Mark D. Roberts,et al.  Ultrametric Distance in Syntax , 1998, Prague Bull. Math. Linguistics.

[35]  Tobias Scheer,et al.  Why phonology is flat: the role of concatenation and linearity , 2013 .

[36]  P. Garvin,et al.  Prolegomena to a Theory of Language , 1953 .

[37]  Bruce Hughes Trees and ultrametric spaces: a categorical equivalence , 2004 .

[38]  David J. Lobina Conceptual Structure and the Emergence of the Language Faculty: Much Ado about Knotting , 2012 .

[39]  G. Lakoff Pronouns and Reference , 1968 .

[40]  Uli Sauerland,et al.  Interfaces + Recursion = Language?: Chomsky's Minimalism and the View from Syntax-Semantics , 2007 .

[41]  Noam Chomsky Approaching UG from Below , 2006 .

[42]  Juan Uriagereka,et al.  Competence for preferences , 2013 .

[43]  L. Karttunen DEFINITE DESCRIPTIONS WITH CROSSING COREFERENCE , 2016 .

[44]  Peter Gärdenfors,et al.  Locative and Directional Prepositions in Conceptual Spaces: The Role of Polar Convexity , 2015, Journal of Logic, Language and Information.

[45]  Juan Uriagereka Regarding the Third Factor: Arguments for a CLASH model , 2014 .

[46]  Juan Uriagereka The minimalist program , 1999 .

[47]  Pierre Pica,et al.  Weak Crossover, Scope, and Agreement in a Minimalist Framework , 1995 .

[48]  P. Stanley Peters,et al.  On the generative power of transformational grammars , 1973, Inf. Sci..

[49]  Yoshihito Dobashi InterPhases: Phase-Theoretic Investigations of Linguistic Interfaces , 2011 .

[50]  Theresa Biberauer,et al.  Challenges to linearization , 2013 .

[51]  Juan Uriagereka,et al.  Chains in Minimalism , 2014 .

[52]  S. Anderson The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory , 2009 .

[53]  Diego Gabriel Krivochen On Phrase Structure building and labeling algorithms: towards a non-uniform theory of syntactic structures , 2015 .

[54]  Hisatsugu Kitahara,et al.  Explorations in Maximizing Syntactic Minimization , 2015 .

[55]  Ronald M. Kaplan,et al.  Lexical Functional Grammar A Formal System for Grammatical Representation , 2004 .

[56]  Aravind K. Joshi,et al.  Natural language parsing: Tree adjoining grammars: How much context-sensitivity is required to provide reasonable structural descriptions? , 1985 .

[57]  B. Partee Montague Grammar and Transformational Grammar. , 1975 .