A System for Image Registration in Digital Subtraction Angiography

In the diagnosis of coronary atherosclerosis radio-opaque dye is injected into the interior of the coronary arteries to make them visible in X-ray images. Because of the confusing presence of overlying or underlying soft tissue and bone and because of the small size of the coronary arteries, large dye concentrations are required to render the arteries sufficiently visible for diagnosis. Because of its increased contrast sensitivity, digital subtraction angiography (DSA) has the potential for providing diagnostic images of the coronary arteries with significantly reduced dye concentrations (Levin, 1984; Tobis et al., 1983; Riederer and Kruger, 1983). In DSA a series of images is acquired during the time period which begins before the injection of dye and continues until the arteries are opacified. These images are then combined into a final processed image in which the change in opacity of the arteries leads to enhanced arterial contrast. A particularly useful and commonly applied DSA technique, “temporal subtraction”, involves the subtraction of a “mask” image, acquired before opacification, from a “contrast” image, acquired after opacification. Ideally, temporal subtraction produces an image in which nothing appears except those arteries in which the amount of dye present has changed, but its usefulness in practice is limited by the image degradation caused by patient motion during image acquisition. The rigid motion of bones and the elastic motion of soft tissue in the field of view cause changes in X-ray opacity which are unrelated to the influx of contrast material. When the two images are subtracted these changes appear as ghost-like artifacts which obscure the arteries to be examined.

[1]  J. W. V. Miller,et al.  Optimal Filtering of Radiographic Image Sequences Using Simultaneous Diagonalization , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  R A Kruger,et al.  Tomographic digital subtraction angiography: initial clinical studies using tomosynthesis. Work in progress. , 1985, Radiology.

[3]  Takao Akatsuka,et al.  REGISTRATION OF LOCALLY DISTORTED IMAGES BY MULTIWINDOW PATTERN MATCHING AND DISPLACEMENT INTERPOLATION: THE PROPOSAL OF AN ALGORITHM AND ITS APPLICATION TO DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY. , 1984 .

[4]  John J. Grefenstette,et al.  Genetic Search with Approximate Function Evaluation , 1985, ICGA.

[5]  Ronald R. Price,et al.  Analytical techniques for image superposition , 1975 .

[6]  Stephen F. Smith,et al.  Flexible Learning of Problem Solving Heuristics Through Adaptive Search , 1983, IJCAI.

[7]  D L Ergun,et al.  Digital subtraction angiography: principles and pitfalls of image improvement techniques. , 1984, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  R A Kruger,et al.  Tomosynthesis applied to digital subtraction angiography. , 1984, Radiology.

[9]  Robert A. Kruger,et al.  Basic concepts of digital subtraction angiography , 1984 .

[10]  Michael P. Fourman,et al.  Compaction of Symbolic Layout Using Genetic Algorithms , 1985, ICGA.

[11]  John Fitzpatrick,et al.  A class of one-to-one two-dimensional transformations , 1987 .

[12]  F. James,et al.  Monte Carlo theory and practice , 1980 .

[13]  Martin Svedlow,et al.  Image Registration: Similarity Measure and Preprocessing Method Comparisons , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[14]  J. David Schaffer,et al.  Multi-Objective Learning via Genetic Algorithms , 1985, IJCAI.

[15]  Ernest L. Hall,et al.  Computer Image Processing and Recognition , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[16]  Cardiac applications of digital subtraction angiography , 1983 .

[17]  Barry Kent Gilbert,et al.  Application Of Digital Image Change Detection To Diagnosis And Follow-Up Of Cancer Involving The Lungs , 1976, Other Conferences.

[18]  John J. Grefenstette,et al.  Genetic Algorithms for the Traveling Salesman Problem , 1985, ICGA.

[19]  Alain Venot,et al.  Automated Correction of Patient Motion and Gray Values Prior to Subtraction in Digitized Angiography , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[20]  Harvey F. Silverman,et al.  A Class of Algorithms for Fast Digital Image Registration , 1972, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[21]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  Digital Picture Processing , 1976 .

[22]  J. F. Lebruchec,et al.  Automated comparison of scintigraphic images. , 1986, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[23]  James Serrin,et al.  Mathematical Principles of Classical Fluid Mechanics , 1959 .

[24]  Albert Macovski,et al.  Medical imaging systems , 1983 .

[25]  Kenneth de Jong,et al.  Adaptive System Design: A Genetic Approach , 1980, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[26]  Andrew Smith,et al.  Real Time Motion Detection In Digital Subtractive Angiography , 1984, Other Conferences.

[27]  Eric Walter,et al.  A distribution-free criterion for robust identification, with applications in system modelling and image processing , 1985, Autom..

[28]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[29]  J. P. Stonestrom,et al.  A Framework for Spectral Artifact Corrections in X-Ray CT , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[30]  R A Kruger A method for time domain filtering using computerized fluoroscopy. , 1981, Medical physics.

[31]  S J Riederer,et al.  Intravenous digital subtraction: a summary of recent developments. , 1983, Radiology.

[32]  S J Riederer,et al.  The application of matched filtering to x-ray exposure reduction in digital subtraction angiography: clinical results. , 1983, Radiology.