Stepping on the Cracks—Transcending the Certainties of Big Data Analytics

Every aspect of modern life is dominated by decision-making and the availability of data. We constantly access, process and evaluate data as we navigate complex and uncertain problem spaces. Communication and Information Technologies (ICTs) have developed to a point where it is possible for very large data sets, measured in Exabyte, to be stored across many servers and gathered by many different people and organizations, for multiple purposes. At the same time, research into Artificial Intelligence has progressed to a point where human decision-making can be supported, or even replaced, by intelligent agents and robotics. We recognize that many routine jobs that were once carried out by people can now be done faster and more flexibly using robotics, and software robotics has now moved beyond the factory and into administrative processes. The possibilities for such systems are enormous and can deliver many benefits to business, governments and ordinary citizens. However, there is also a downside to be considered. Is there still a role for human experience and intuition? How can we ensure that the benefits of analytics and AI continue to outweigh threats? How should we approach management of BI and AI on an on-going basis? This paper advocates an open systems approach in which B&AI may be incorporated with tools that support complex methods of inquiry.

[1]  T. Davenport,et al.  The dark side of customer analytics , 2007 .

[2]  S. Kraemer Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Gregory Bateson , 1993, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[3]  Vasilios Katos,et al.  Dealing with epistemic uncertainty in the SST framework , 2006 .

[4]  Karl Raimund Sir Popper,et al.  The Myth of the Framework : In Defence of Science and Rationality , 1997 .

[5]  Börje Langefors,et al.  Infological models and information user views , 1980, Inf. Syst..

[6]  S. Hart Axiology--Theory of Values , 1971 .

[7]  William J. Kettinger,et al.  The infological equation extended: towards conceptual clarity in the relationship between data, information and knowledge , 2010, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[8]  David J. Pauleen,et al.  Big data investments in knowledge and non-knowledge intensive firms: what the market tells us , 2017, J. Knowl. Manag..

[9]  L. Mises,et al.  Human Action: A Treatise on Economics , 1949 .

[10]  Amitai Etzioni,et al.  Authority Structure and Organizational Effectiveness , 1959 .

[11]  Arthur P. Dempster,et al.  Upper and Lower Probabilities Induced by a Multivalued Mapping , 1967, Classic Works of the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Belief Functions.

[12]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness , 1974 .

[13]  Peter M. Bednar,et al.  Knowledge Creation and Sharing - Complex Methods of Inquiry and Inconsistent Theory , 2005, ECKM.

[14]  Veda C. Storey,et al.  Business Intelligence and Analytics: From Big Data to Big Impact , 2012, MIS Q..

[15]  Elliot W. Eisner,et al.  Toward a methodology of naturalistic inquiry in educational evaluation , 1978 .

[16]  Peter M. Bednar,et al.  Innovation management through the use of diversity networks , 2008, Int. J. Knowl. Learn..

[17]  Glenn Shafer,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Evidence , 2020, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.

[18]  David Chavalarias,et al.  The unlikely encounter between von Foerster and Snowden: When second-order cybernetics sheds light on societal impacts of Big Data , 2016 .

[19]  Mirko Noordegraaf,et al.  Risky Business: How Professionals and Professional Fields (Must) Deal with Organizational Issues , 2011 .

[20]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Big data: the management revolution. , 2012, Harvard business review.