Engagement Measures in Massive Open Online Courses

Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) provision has proliferated over the past four years and millions of learners have participated. However, it is widely acknowledged that the number of completions is disturbingly low and MOOC drop-out rates have been a prominent issue of discussion. Currently, most MOOC analysis focuses on aspects such as patterns of engagement and prediction of dropout using data obtained by applying learning analytics to the large amounts of data gathered. In contrast, the effectiveness of teaching and learning programs in traditional face-to-face Higher Education (HE) settings is increasingly being assessed by measures linked to the promotion of student engagement. Internationally, student engagement surveys are being used to provide profiles of the effectiveness of teaching and learning within and between courses. In this paper we consider MOOC participation and drop-out issues emerging from the literature, and provide an overview of the student engagement surveys now widely used in HE. MOOC pedagogy is examined from the perspective of student engagement and we identify the need for a similar model adapted to MOOCs which could provide both a framework for course development and an instrument to assess aspects of teaching and learning in existing courses.

[1]  Paul D. Umbach,et al.  Faculty do Matter: The Role of College Faculty in Student Learning and Engagement , 2005 .

[2]  Dianne H.B. Welsh,et al.  The New Generation of Massive Open Online Course (MOOCS) and Entrepreneurship Education , 2013 .

[3]  Philip G. Altbach,et al.  MOOCs as Neocolonialism: Who Controls Knowledge? , 2014 .

[4]  Jaakko Kurhila,et al.  Multi-faceted support for MOOC in programming , 2012, SIGITE '12.

[5]  Shirley Williams,et al.  The impact and reach of MOOCs: a developing countries’ perspective , 2013 .

[6]  J. Daniel,et al.  Making Sense of MOOCs : Musings in a Maze of Myth , Paradox and Possibility Author : , 2013 .

[7]  Gayle S. Christensen,et al.  The MOOC Phenomenon: Who Takes Massive Open Online Courses and Why? , 2013 .

[8]  Chris Piech,et al.  Deconstructing disengagement: analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses , 2013, LAK '13.

[9]  Mordechai Ben-Ari MOOCs on introductory programming: a travelogue , 2013, INROADS.

[10]  Gráinne Conole,et al.  MOOCs as disruptive technologies: strategies for enhancing the learner experience and quality of MOOCs Los MOOC como tecnologías disruptivas: estrategias para mejorar la experiencia de aprendizaje y la calidad de los MOOC. , 2016 .

[11]  Patrick Aebischer,et al.  Boosting Higher Education in Africa through Shared Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) , 2014 .

[12]  Cathy Sandeen Integrating MOOCS into Traditional Higher Education: The Emerging “MOOC 3.0” Era , 2013 .

[13]  Lillian Corbin,et al.  Student engagement: rhetoric and reality , 2012 .

[14]  Robert Plonsey,et al.  Bioelectricity: A Quantitative Approach Duke University’s First MOOC , 2013 .

[15]  Timothy Read,et al.  Toward a Quality Model for UNED MOOCs , 2014 .

[16]  Meghan Ecclestone,et al.  MOOCs as a Professional Development Tool for Librarians , 2013 .

[17]  Ebba Ossiannilsson,et al.  Perspectives on MOOC quality : An account of the EFQUEL MOOC Quality Project , 2014 .

[18]  Doug Clow,et al.  MOOCs and the funnel of participation , 2013, LAK '13.

[19]  Jane Sinclair,et al.  Massive open online courses: a review of usage and evaluation , 2015, Int. J. Learn. Technol..

[20]  Michael Nanfito,et al.  MOOCs: Opportunities,Impacts, and Challenges: Massive Open Online Courses in Colleges and Universities , 2013 .

[21]  Ernest T. Pascarella,et al.  How Effective are the NSSE Benchmarks in Predicting Important Educational Outcomes? , 2010 .

[22]  Lise Getoor,et al.  Learning Latent Engagement Patterns of Students in Online Courses , 2014, AAAI.

[23]  Katy Jordan,et al.  Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses , 2014 .

[24]  Stephen John Quaye,et al.  Student Engagement in Higher Education : Theoretical Perspectives and Practical Approaches for Diverse Populations , 2009 .

[25]  Jonathan Rosewell,et al.  The OpenupEd quality label: benchmarks for MOOCs , 2014 .

[26]  Jane Sinclair,et al.  A Tale of Two Modes: Initial Reflections on an Innovative MOOC , 2014, LTEC@KMO.

[27]  Patrick Jermann,et al.  Capturing "attrition intensifying" structural traits from didactic interaction sequences of MOOC learners , 2014, EMNLP 2014.

[28]  Stephen R. Porter Do College Student Surveys Have Any Validity? , 2011 .