Purpose – The purpose of this paper, drawing as it does on earlier research, is to provide the context for a discussion on the use of rewards and recognition programmes in knowledge aware organisations. Design/methodology/approach – The paper shows that knowledge sharing is the fundamental requirement of a knowledge-based organisation. Some of the greatest challenges for organisations moving down the knowledge management path stem from well-established practices of hoarding knowledge, practices which, in the past, have been well rewarded. Employees’ motivation was to hoard knowledge because of the competitive advantage that this would give them. The challenge now is to develop an organisational culture where sharing knowledge is the norm. In seeking ways to foster this culture managers are implementing incentive programmes in the belief that employees will be motivated to share their knowledge across the organisation. Some organisations are investing large amounts of organisational resources towards this end. This paper uses the results of the earlier research to provide a context for an examination of the use of rewards and recognition programmes in the knowledge aware organisation. Findings – The paper finds that reward and recognition programmes can positively affect motivation, performance and interest within an organisation. While a little more problematic, team-based incentives, if designed appropriately, can also encourage and support a range of positive outcomes. But research has yet to reveal whether programmes of this type will influence employees to share their knowledge and learning. Neither is there any research-based evidence to show that these activities do provide the expected or hoped for return on the, sometimes, large amounts of money that organisations invest in them. Research limitations/implications – While there is a strong history of research into the impact of rewards on aspects of employee behaviour including motivation and performance, no research to date has investigated the impact on knowledge sharing. Practical implications – The paper suggests that managers who are relying on rewards and recognition programmes as part of their strategies for cultural change need to support research programmes so that they can be confident that the large amounts of resources they are investing for this purpose will bring the return they think. Originality/value – This paper provides the context for a discussion. It shows that while organisations are investing in reward and recognition programmes, research on the value of such programmes as factors that motivate knowledge sharing has not been explored empirically.
[1]
Janice R. Lachance.
International Symposium of the International Personnel Management Association
,
2000
.
[2]
Morton Deutsch,et al.
The effects of cooperation and competition upon group process
,
1948
.
[3]
David B. Balkin,et al.
Compensation, Organizational Strategy, and Firm Performance
,
1992
.
[4]
R. Eisenberger,et al.
Can salient reward increase creative performance without reducing intrinsic creative interest?
,
1997,
Journal of personality and social psychology.
[5]
Dean Tjosvold,et al.
The Dynamics of Interdependence in Organizations
,
1986
.
[6]
James E. Nickel,et al.
Small-Group Incentives: Gain Sharing in the Microcosm
,
1990
.
[7]
G. Grisetti,et al.
Further Reading
,
1984,
IEEE Spectrum.
[8]
Frank J. Landy,et al.
The measurement of work performance : methods, theory and applications / Frank J. Landy, James L. Farr
,
1983
.
[9]
Alexandra K. Wigdor,et al.
Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay
,
1991
.
[10]
Canice Prendergast,et al.
Favoritism in Organizations
,
1993,
Journal of Political Economy.
[11]
S. Kerr.
On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B.
,
1975,
Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.
[12]
Elizabeth J. Hawk,et al.
Realizing the Potential of Teams Through Team-Based Rewards
,
1994
.
[13]
E. Deci.
Effects of Externally Mediated Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation.
,
1971
.
[14]
B. Shamir,et al.
Calculations, Values, and Identities: The Sources of Collectivistic Work Motivation
,
1990
.
[15]
Mak Khojasteh,et al.
Motivating the Private vs. Public Sector Managers
,
1993
.
[16]
G. I. Kustova,et al.
From the author
,
2019,
Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics.
[17]
Steven E. Gross.
When Jobs Become Team Roles, What do you Pay for?
,
1997
.
[18]
M. Deutsch.
An Experimental Study of the Effects of Co-Operation and Competition upon Group Process
,
1949
.
[19]
Sam T. Johnson.
Work Teams
,
1993
.
[20]
Philip Stiles,et al.
Performance management and the psychological contract
,
1997
.
[21]
R. Wageman.
Interdependence and Group Effectiveness
,
1995
.
[22]
R. Eisenberger,et al.
Detrimental effects of reward. Reality or myth?
,
1996,
The American psychologist.
[23]
John Shields,et al.
Performance Management and the Psychological Contract in the Australian Federal Public Sector
,
2002
.
[24]
R. Brandt.
Punished by Rewards
,
1995
.
[25]
John Halligan.
Senior Executive Pay Policies in the Australian Public Servi
,
1994
.