Item Selection in Computerized Classification Testing

Several alternatives for item selection algorithms based on item response theory in computerized classification testing (CCT) have been suggested, with no conclusive evidence on the substantial superiority of a single method. It is argued that the lack of sizable effect is because some of the methods actually assess items very similarly through different calculations and will usually select the same item. Consideration of methods that assess information across a wider range is often unnecessary under realistic conditions, although it might be advantageous to utilize them only early in a test. In addition, the efficiency of item selection approaches depend on the termination criteria that are used, which is demonstrated through didactic example and Monte Carlo simulation. Item selection at the cut score, which seems conceptually appropriate for CCT, is not always the most efficient option. A broad framework for item selection in CCT is presented that incorporates these points.

[1]  J. Andel Sequential Analysis , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[2]  F. Lord Applications of Item Response Theory To Practical Testing Problems , 1980 .

[3]  Mark D. Reckase,et al.  A Procedure for Decision Making Using Tailored Testing , 1983 .

[4]  David J. Weiss,et al.  A Comparison of IRT-Based Adaptive Mastery Testing and a Sequential Mastery Testing Procedure , 1983 .

[5]  David J. Weiss,et al.  APPLICATION OF COMPUTERIZED ADAPTIVE TESTING TO EDUCATIONAL PROBLEMS , 1984 .

[6]  R. Hambleton,et al.  Item Response Theory , 1984, The History of Educational Measurement.

[7]  Theodore W. Frick Computerized Adaptive Mastery Tests as Expert Systems , 1992 .

[8]  Mark D. Reckase,et al.  The Selection of Test Items for Decision Making with a Computer Adaptive Test. , 1994 .

[9]  Mark D. Reckase,et al.  Comparison of SPRT and Sequential Bayes Procedures for Classifying Examinees Into Two Categories Using a Computerized Test , 1996 .

[10]  Hua-Hua Chang,et al.  A Global Information Approach to Computerized Adaptive Testing , 1996 .

[11]  Chi-Yu Huang,et al.  Unidimensional Approximations for a Computerized Classification Test When the Item Pool and Latent Space Are Multidimensional. ACT Research Report Series 97-5. , 1997 .

[12]  Chi-Yu Huang,et al.  Unidimensional Approximations for a Computerized Test When the Item Pool and Latent Space are Multidimensional , 1997 .

[13]  Identifiers California,et al.  Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education , 1998 .

[14]  Richard M. Luecht,et al.  Some Practical Examples of Computer‐Adaptive Sequential Testing , 1998 .

[15]  Theodorus Johannes Hendrikus Maria Eggen,et al.  Item Selection in Adaptive Testing with the Sequential Probability Ratio Test , 1999 .

[16]  Chuan-Ju Lin,et al.  Effects of Item-Selection Criteria on Classification Testing with the Sequential Probability Ratio Test. ACT Research Report Series. , 2000 .

[17]  Hans J. Vos,et al.  A Bayesian Procedure in the Context of Sequential Mastery Testing , 2000 .

[18]  Theodorus Johannes Hendrikus Maria Eggen,et al.  Computerized Adaptive Testing for Classifying Examinees into three Categories , 2000 .

[19]  Robert L. Smith,et al.  A Comparison of Computer Mastery Models When Pool Characteristics Vary , 2002 .

[20]  Shu-ying Chen,et al.  Effects of Practical Constraints on Item Selection Rules at the Early Stages of Computerized Adaptive Testing , 2004 .

[21]  P. Fayers Item Response Theory for Psychologists , 2004, Quality of Life Research.

[22]  Hong Jiao,et al.  An Investigation of Two Combination Procedures of SPRT for Three-category Classification Decisions in Computerized Classification Test , 2004 .

[23]  Nathan A. Thompson,et al.  Computerized Classification Testing with Composite Hypotheses , 2007 .

[24]  Nathan A. Thompson A Practitioner's Guide for Variable-length Computerized Classification Testing , 2007 .

[25]  Alexander Weissman,et al.  Mutual Information Item Selection in Adaptive Classification Testing , 2007 .

[26]  Lawrence M. Rudner An Examination of Decision-Theory Adaptive Testing Procedures , 2009 .