Determination of minimum pixel resolution for shape analysis: Proposal of a new data validation method for computerized images

Abstract In many different research areas not only size, but also an exact description of particle shape is important in order to understand certain physical or chemical processes. Digital image analyses with specially developed software (DIP) have become increasingly popular in recent years, producing a huge amount of reproducible data. However, since image captures are pixelated, purely digitalisation problems/errors may occur and, hence, a minimum number of pixels for meaningful results has to be established. This may depend on different computer software or on calculation methods. Here we bring Elongation, Circularity and Sphericity in relation and calculate in a theoretical model maximum values of Circularity and Sphericity for specific Elongation values from 0 to 1. In these simple 2-dimensional plots, which can be applied to any DIP program, a line marking the upper limit of congruent shape analysis can be calculated. Points that fall far above the theoretical maximum curve are interpreted as digitalisation issues of the DIP programs: especially measuring the boundary length (perimeter) is not as simple. It can be shown that, with increasing particle size, the rate of obvious erroneous shape analysis data decreases, and thus a minimum pixel number can be established after “pixel size cleaning”. We tested our model with two commonly used plugins with two different shape calculation methods for particle analysis of the DIP program ImageJ: while an object has to be build-up of about 200 pixels using the preinstalled plugin, the threshold can be significantly reduced (50) using the Particles8_Plus plugin by Landini.

[1]  Mark Peternell,et al.  Automation of pattern recognition and fractal-geometry-based pattern quantification, exemplified by mineral-phase distribution patterns in igneous rocks , 2009, Comput. Geosci..

[2]  Ted Lewis,et al.  An automated system for the statistical analysis of sediment texture and structure at the micro scale , 2010, Comput. Geosci..

[3]  R. Folk Student Operator Error in Determination of Roundness, Sphericity, and Grain size , 1955 .

[4]  K. Pye,et al.  Particle shape: a review and new methods of characterization and classification , 2007 .

[5]  W. C. Krumbein Measurement and geological significance of shape and roundness of sedimentary particles , 1941 .

[6]  C. Wentworth The shapes of beach pebbles , 1923 .

[7]  Paula Schneiderhöhn Eine vergleichende Studie über Methoden zur quantitativen Bestimmung von Abrundung und Form an Sandkörnern (Im Hinblick auf die Verwendbarkeit an Dünnschliffen.) , 1954 .

[8]  David W. Fowler,et al.  Some properties of irregular 3-D particles , 2006 .

[9]  F Podczeck,et al.  Evaluation of a standardised procedure to assess the shape of pellets using image analysis. , 1999, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[10]  M. Kunaver The degree of dispersion of pigments in powder coatings , 2003 .

[11]  J. Bullard,et al.  Contact function, uniform-thickness shell volume, and convexity measure for 3D star-shaped random particles , 2013 .

[12]  E. Cox A method of assigning numerical and percentage values to the degree of roundness of sand grains , 1927 .

[13]  M. Favaro,et al.  Characterization of lapis lazuli and corresponding purified pigments for a provenance study of ultramarine pigments used in works of art , 2012, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[14]  C. Igathinathane,et al.  Comparison of particle size distribution of celestite mineral by machine vision ΣVolume approach and mechanical sieving , 2012 .

[15]  Shahab Sokhansanj,et al.  Sieveless particle size distribution analysis of particulate materials through computer vision , 2009 .

[16]  H. Frijlink,et al.  Which shape factor(s) best describe granules , 2004 .

[17]  C. Wentworth A Scale of Grade and Class Terms for Clastic Sediments , 1922, The Journal of Geology.

[18]  M. R. Cox,et al.  A practical approach to grain shape quantification , 2008 .

[19]  H. Wadell,et al.  Sphericity and Roundness of Rock Particles , 1933, The Journal of Geology.

[20]  Stanley R. Sternberg,et al.  Biomedical Image Processing , 1983, Computer.

[21]  N. Page,et al.  Selection of Descriptors for Particle Shape Characterization , 2003 .

[22]  José Blanco-Méndez,et al.  Image analysis of the shape of granulated powder grains. , 2004, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[23]  Edward J. Garboczi,et al.  The 3-D shape of blasted and crushed rocks: From 20 μm to 38 mm , 2012 .

[24]  José Blanco-Méndez,et al.  Microscopic image analysis techniques for the morphological characterization of pharmaceutical particles: influence of the software, and the factor algorithms used in the shape factor estimation. , 2007, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[25]  Marian Wiwart,et al.  Identification of hybrids of spelt and wheat and their parental forms using shape and color descriptors , 2012 .

[26]  Bernard Cuq,et al.  Morphological characterization of wheat powders, how to characterize the shape of particles? , 2011 .

[27]  C. Igathinathane,et al.  Major orthogonal dimensions measurement of food grains by machine vision using ImageJ , 2009 .

[28]  Herbert Freeman,et al.  On the Encoding of Arbitrary Geometric Configurations , 1961, IRE Trans. Electron. Comput..

[29]  J. E. Dunn Microscopic measurements for the determination of particle size of pigments and powders , 1930 .

[30]  Evan C. Crawford,et al.  An ImageJ plugin for the rapid morphological characterization of separated particles and an initial application to placer gold analysis , 2009, Comput. Geosci..

[31]  Shahab Sokhansanj,et al.  Machine vision based particle size and size distribution determination of airborne dust particles of wood and bark pellets , 2009 .

[32]  H. Wadell Volume, Shape, and Roundness of Rock Particles , 1932, The Journal of Geology.

[33]  Frederick G. Tickell The Examination of Fragmental Rocks , 2015 .

[34]  Alida Mazzoli,et al.  Particle size, size distribution and morphological evaluation of airborne dust particles of diverse woods by Scanning Electron Microscopy and image processing program , 2012 .

[35]  W. Batchelor,et al.  Shape identification and particles size distribution from basic shape parameters using ImageJ , 2008 .

[36]  H. Green A photomicrographic method for the determination of particle size of paint and rubber pigments , 1921 .

[37]  B. R. Jennings,et al.  Particle size measurement: the equivalent spherical diameter , 1988, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.