Commentary: Robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass: State of an art

[1]  Lucy Manuel,et al.  ‘Is totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting compared with minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting associated with superior outcomes in patients with isolated left anterior descending disease?’ , 2020, Annals of medicine and surgery.

[2]  M. Lemma,et al.  Minimally Invasive coronary surgery compared to STernotomy coronary artery bypass grafting: The MIST trial. , 2019, Contemporary clinical trials.

[3]  E. Tuzcu,et al.  Robotic Totally Endoscopic Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes from the Past two Decades , 2019, Innovations.

[4]  G. Feuchtner,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Perioperative and Mid-Term Results of TECAB and MIDCAB for Revascularization of Anterior Wall , 2017, Innovations.

[5]  Matteo Pettinari,et al.  The state of robotic cardiac surgery in Europe. , 2017, Annals of cardiothoracic surgery.

[6]  M. Ruel,et al.  Hybrid approach for coronary artery revascularization: where do we stand? , 2014, Current opinion in cardiology.

[7]  M. Ruel,et al.  Can Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting be Initiated and Practiced Safely? , 2013, Innovations.

[8]  Benjamin Sohmer,et al.  Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting via a small thoracotomy versus off-pump: a case-matched study. , 2011, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[9]  Saif Usman,et al.  Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Dual-Center Experience in 450 Consecutive Patients , 2009, Circulation.

[10]  Francis Robicsek,et al.  Robotic cardiac surgery: time told! , 2008, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[11]  Johannes Bonatti,et al.  History and current status of robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass. , 2012, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.