Plant biodiversity assessment through soil eDNA reflects temporal and local diversity
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Lynsey R. Harper,et al. The Multiple States of Environmental DNA and What Is Known about Their Persistence in Aquatic Environments , 2021, Environmental science & technology.
[2] D. J. Meltzer,et al. Late Quaternary dynamics of Arctic biota from ancient environmental genomics , 2021, Nature.
[3] A. Nowak,et al. Is it possible to understand a book missing a quarter of the letters? Unveiling the belowground species richness of grasslands , 2021, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment.
[4] L. Nielsen,et al. Detecting rare terrestrial orchids and associated plant communities from soil samples with eDNA methods , 2021, Biodiversity and Conservation.
[5] P. Madesis,et al. Exploring plant diversity through soil DNA in Thai national parks for influencing land reform and agriculture planning , 2021, PeerJ.
[6] Jian Sun,et al. Ecological indicators and bioindicator plant species for biomonitoring industrial pollution: Eco-based environmental assessment , 2021 .
[7] M. Zobel,et al. Woody encroachment in grassland elicits complex changes in the functional structure of above‐ and belowground biota , 2021, Ecosphere.
[8] P. Taberlet,et al. Lake Sedimentary DNA Research on Past Terrestrial and Aquatic Biodiversity: Overview and Recommendations , 2021, Quaternary.
[9] L. Bernatchez,et al. The future of biodiversity monitoring and conservation utilizing environmental DNA , 2020, Environmental DNA.
[10] M. Monaghan,et al. Trade-offs between reducing complex terminology and producing accurate interpretations from environmental DNA: Comment on “Environmental DNA: What’s behind the term?” by Pawlowski et al. (2020) , 2020 .
[11] R. Wayne,et al. The utility of environmental DNA from sediment and water samples for recovery of observed plant and animal species from four Mojave Desert springs , 2020 .
[12] R. Gutiérrez,et al. Revealing hidden plant diversity in arid environments , 2020 .
[13] J. Maldonado,et al. First DNA sequence reference library for mammals and plants of the Eastern Mediterranean Region. , 2020, Genome.
[14] R. Halvorsen,et al. Towards a systematics of ecodiversity: The EcoSyst framework , 2020 .
[15] J. Poulain,et al. Persistence of environmental DNA in cultivated soils: implication of this memory effect for reconstructing the dynamics of land use and cover changes , 2020, Scientific Reports.
[16] Richard T. Corlett,et al. Applications of environmental DNA (eDNA) in ecology and conservation: opportunities, challenges and prospects , 2020, Biodiversity and Conservation.
[17] F. Denoeud,et al. The Treasure Vault Can be Opened: Large-Scale Genome Skimming Works Well Using Herbarium and Silica Gel Dried Material , 2020, Plants.
[18] S. Rogers,et al. Predicting the fate of eDNA in the environment and implications for studying biodiversity , 2019, Proceedings of the Royal Society B.
[19] A. Felton,et al. The tree species matters: Biodiversity and ecosystem service implications of replacing Scots pine production stands with Norway spruce , 2019, Ambio.
[20] David A. Strand,et al. Detection of an invasive aquatic plant in natural water bodies using environmental DNA , 2019, PloS one.
[21] H. H. Bruun,et al. Predicting provenance of forensic soil samples: Linking soil to ecological habitats by metabarcoding and supervised classification , 2019, PloS one.
[22] Liding Chen,et al. Plant root-shoot biomass allocation over diverse biomes: A global synthesis , 2019, Global Ecology and Conservation.
[23] S. Wilson,et al. Belowground plant parts are crucial for comprehensively estimating total plant richness in herbaceous and woody habitats. , 2019, Ecology.
[24] Md Saydur Rahman,et al. Past, present, and future perspectives of environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding: A systematic review in methods, monitoring, and applications of global eDNA , 2019, Global Ecology and Conservation.
[25] P. Taberlet,et al. Body size determines soil community assembly in a tropical forest. , 2018, Molecular ecology.
[26] H. H. Bruun,et al. Vascular plant species richness and bioindication predict multi‐taxon species richness , 2018, Methods in Ecology and Evolution.
[27] P. Taberlet,et al. Metabarcoding of modern soil DNA gives a highly local vegetation signal in Svalbard tundra , 2018, The Holocene.
[28] H. Insam,et al. Extracellular DNA in natural environments: features, relevance and applications , 2018, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.
[29] C. M. Prosser,et al. Effects of bioturbation on environmental DNA migration through soil media , 2018, PloS one.
[30] B. Deagle,et al. Counting with DNA in metabarcoding studies: How should we convert sequence reads to dietary data? , 2018, bioRxiv.
[31] N. Yoccoz,et al. Plant DNA metabarcoding of lake sediments: How does it represent the contemporary vegetation , 2018, PloS one.
[32] Niklaus E. Zimmermann,et al. Accelerated increase in plant species richness on mountain summits is linked to warming , 2018, Nature.
[33] Charles K. Lee,et al. Evidence of plant and animal communities at exposed and subglacial (cave) geothermal sites in Antarctica , 2018, Polar Biology.
[34] Kristy Deiner,et al. Environmental DNA metabarcoding: Transforming how we survey animal and plant communities , 2017, Molecular ecology.
[35] G. Ficetola,et al. Ancient plant DNA in lake sediments. , 2017, The New phytologist.
[36] N. Yoccoz,et al. Not only mosses: lemming winter diets as described by DNA metabarcoding , 2017, Polar Biology.
[37] R. Allaby,et al. A new model for ancient DNA decay based on paleogenomic meta-analysis , 2017, bioRxiv.
[38] J. Wiens. Climate-Related Local Extinctions Are Already Widespread among Plant and Animal Species , 2016, PLoS biology.
[39] Peter Slaughter,et al. codyn: An r package of community dynamics metrics , 2016 .
[40] Peter M Hollingsworth,et al. Telling plant species apart with DNA: from barcodes to genomes , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[41] D. Baird,et al. Large-Scale Monitoring of Plants through Environmental DNA Metabarcoding of Soil: Recovery, Resolution, and Annotation of Four DNA Markers , 2016, PloS one.
[42] H. Doi,et al. Evaluation of the Environmental DNA Method for Estimating Distribution and Biomass of Submerged Aquatic Plants , 2016, PloS one.
[43] P. Taberlet,et al. Highly Overlapping Winter Diet in Two Sympatric Lemming Species Revealed by DNA Metabarcoding , 2015, PloS one.
[44] M. Stech,et al. DNA barcoding of Arctic bryophytes: an example from the moss genus Dicranum (Dicranaceae, Bryophyta) , 2014, Polar Biology.
[45] Jacques Ravel,et al. An improved dual-indexing approach for multiplexed 16S rRNA gene sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq platform , 2014, Microbiome.
[46] P. Taberlet,et al. Fifty Thousand Years of Arctic Vegetation and Megafaunal Diet 1 Reconstruction of Arctic Vegetation from Permafrost Samples 121 , 2022 .
[47] T. Ekrem,et al. Restricted variation in plant barcoding markers limits identification in closely related bryophyte species , 2013, Molecular ecology resources.
[48] B. Deagle,et al. Quantifying sequence proportions in a DNA‐based diet study using Ion Torrent amplicon sequencing: which counts count? , 2013, Molecular ecology resources.
[49] E. Uuemaa,et al. Trends in the use of landscape spatial metrics as landscape indicators: A review , 2013 .
[50] M. Pärtel,et al. Below‐ground plant species richness: new insights from DNA‐based methods , 2012 .
[51] P. Taberlet,et al. DNA from soil mirrors plant taxonomic and growth form diversity. , 2012, Molecular ecology.
[52] V. I. Gusarov,et al. New environmental metabarcodes for analysing soil DNA: potential for studying past and present ecosystems , 2012, Molecular ecology.
[53] N. Yoccoz. The future of environmental DNA in ecology , 2012, Molecular ecology.
[54] M. Pärtel,et al. Plant species richness belowground: higher richness and new patterns revealed by next‐generation sequencing , 2012, Molecular ecology.
[55] P. Taberlet,et al. Environmental DNA , 2012, Molecular ecology.
[56] A. Barbati,et al. Contribution of large-scale forest inventories to biodiversity assessment and monitoring , 2011 .
[57] R. Bertrand,et al. Changes in plant community composition lag behind climate warming in lowland forests , 2011, Nature.
[58] R. Ohlemüller,et al. Rapid Range Shifts of Species Associated with High Levels of Climate Warming , 2011, Science.
[59] J. Wilson,et al. Cover plus: ways of measuring plant canopies and the terms used for them , 2011 .
[60] T. Bruns,et al. Quantifying microbial communities with 454 pyrosequencing: does read abundance count? , 2010, Molecular ecology.
[61] P. Taberlet,et al. Using next‐generation sequencing for molecular reconstruction of past Arctic vegetation and climate , 2010, Molecular ecology resources.
[62] William A. Walters,et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data , 2010, Nature Methods.
[63] X. Ge,et al. Evaluation of 10 plant barcodes in Bryophyta (Mosses) , 2010 .
[64] C. Meredieu,et al. Using cover measurements to estimate aboveground understorey biomass in Maritime pine stands , 2009, Annals of Forest Science.
[65] J. Ascher,et al. Extracellular DNA in soil and sediment: fate and ecological relevance , 2009, Biology and Fertility of Soils.
[66] Thierry Vermat,et al. Power and limitations of the chloroplast trnL (UAA) intron for plant DNA barcoding , 2006, Nucleic acids research.
[67] David A. Wardle,et al. Understory vegetation as a forest ecosystem driver: evidence from the northern Swedish boreal forest , 2005 .
[68] W. Barthlott,et al. Global patterns of plant diversity and floristic knowledge , 2005 .
[69] T. Økland,et al. Changes in forest understorey vegetation in Norway related to long-term soil acidification and climatic change , 2004 .
[70] B. Schmid,et al. Relationships between productivity, number of shoots and number of species in bryophytes and vascular plants , 2001 .
[71] R. H. Økland,et al. Dynamics of understory vegetation in an old-growth boreal coniferous forest, 1988 -1993 , 1996 .
[72] Rune Halvorsen Økland,et al. Canonical Correspondence Analysis with variation partitioning: some comments and an application , 1994 .
[73] Daniel J. Hayesa,et al. Boreal forests , 2022 .
[74] M. Monaghan,et al. Trade- offs between reducing complex terminology and producing accurate interpretations from environmental DNA: Comment on “Environmental DNA: What's behind the term?” , 2021 .
[75] Erik Framstad. Terrestrisk naturovervåking i 2013:Markvegetasjon, epifytter, smågnagere og fugl. Sammenfatning av resultater. , 2019 .
[76] R Core Team,et al. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .
[77] F. James Rohlf,et al. Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research , 1969 .