Plant biodiversity assessment through soil eDNA reflects temporal and local diversity

Several studies have shown the potential of eDNA‐based proxies for plant identification, but little is known about their spatial and temporal resolution. This limits its use for plant biodiversity assessments and monitoring of vegetation responses to environmental changes. Here we calibrate the temporal and spatial plant signals detected with soil eDNA surveys by comparing with a standard visual above‐ground vegetation survey. Our approach compares vegetation in an old‐growth boreal forest in southern Norway, surveyed in 100 permanent 1‐m2 plots seven times over a 30‐year period, with a single soil eDNA metabarcoding‐based survey from soil samples collected at the same 100 plots in the year of the last vegetation survey. On average, 60% and 10% of the vascular plants and bryophytes recorded across all vegetation surveys were detected by soil eDNA. Taxa detected by soil eDNA were more representative for the local taxa pool than for the specific plot, and corresponded to those surveyed over the 30‐year period although most closely matched the current taxa composition. Soil eDNA detected abundant taxa better than rare ones although both rare taxa and taxa unrecorded by the visual survey were detected. Our study highlights the potential of soil eDNA assessments for monitoring of vegetation responses over broad spatial and temporal scales. The method's ability to detect abundant taxa makes it suitable for assessment of vegetation composition in a specific area and for broad‐scale plant diversity assessments.

[1]  Lynsey R. Harper,et al.  The Multiple States of Environmental DNA and What Is Known about Their Persistence in Aquatic Environments , 2021, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  D. J. Meltzer,et al.  Late Quaternary dynamics of Arctic biota from ancient environmental genomics , 2021, Nature.

[3]  A. Nowak,et al.  Is it possible to understand a book missing a quarter of the letters? Unveiling the belowground species richness of grasslands , 2021, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment.

[4]  L. Nielsen,et al.  Detecting rare terrestrial orchids and associated plant communities from soil samples with eDNA methods , 2021, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[5]  P. Madesis,et al.  Exploring plant diversity through soil DNA in Thai national parks for influencing land reform and agriculture planning , 2021, PeerJ.

[6]  Jian Sun,et al.  Ecological indicators and bioindicator plant species for biomonitoring industrial pollution: Eco-based environmental assessment , 2021 .

[7]  M. Zobel,et al.  Woody encroachment in grassland elicits complex changes in the functional structure of above‐ and belowground biota , 2021, Ecosphere.

[8]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Lake Sedimentary DNA Research on Past Terrestrial and Aquatic Biodiversity: Overview and Recommendations , 2021, Quaternary.

[9]  L. Bernatchez,et al.  The future of biodiversity monitoring and conservation utilizing environmental DNA , 2020, Environmental DNA.

[10]  M. Monaghan,et al.  Trade-offs between reducing complex terminology and producing accurate interpretations from environmental DNA: Comment on “Environmental DNA: What’s behind the term?” by Pawlowski et al. (2020) , 2020 .

[11]  R. Wayne,et al.  The utility of environmental DNA from sediment and water samples for recovery of observed plant and animal species from four Mojave Desert springs , 2020 .

[12]  R. Gutiérrez,et al.  Revealing hidden plant diversity in arid environments , 2020 .

[13]  J. Maldonado,et al.  First DNA sequence reference library for mammals and plants of the Eastern Mediterranean Region. , 2020, Genome.

[14]  R. Halvorsen,et al.  Towards a systematics of ecodiversity: The EcoSyst framework , 2020 .

[15]  J. Poulain,et al.  Persistence of environmental DNA in cultivated soils: implication of this memory effect for reconstructing the dynamics of land use and cover changes , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[16]  Richard T. Corlett,et al.  Applications of environmental DNA (eDNA) in ecology and conservation: opportunities, challenges and prospects , 2020, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[17]  F. Denoeud,et al.  The Treasure Vault Can be Opened: Large-Scale Genome Skimming Works Well Using Herbarium and Silica Gel Dried Material , 2020, Plants.

[18]  S. Rogers,et al.  Predicting the fate of eDNA in the environment and implications for studying biodiversity , 2019, Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

[19]  A. Felton,et al.  The tree species matters: Biodiversity and ecosystem service implications of replacing Scots pine production stands with Norway spruce , 2019, Ambio.

[20]  David A. Strand,et al.  Detection of an invasive aquatic plant in natural water bodies using environmental DNA , 2019, PloS one.

[21]  H. H. Bruun,et al.  Predicting provenance of forensic soil samples: Linking soil to ecological habitats by metabarcoding and supervised classification , 2019, PloS one.

[22]  Liding Chen,et al.  Plant root-shoot biomass allocation over diverse biomes: A global synthesis , 2019, Global Ecology and Conservation.

[23]  S. Wilson,et al.  Belowground plant parts are crucial for comprehensively estimating total plant richness in herbaceous and woody habitats. , 2019, Ecology.

[24]  Md Saydur Rahman,et al.  Past, present, and future perspectives of environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding: A systematic review in methods, monitoring, and applications of global eDNA , 2019, Global Ecology and Conservation.

[25]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Body size determines soil community assembly in a tropical forest. , 2018, Molecular ecology.

[26]  H. H. Bruun,et al.  Vascular plant species richness and bioindication predict multi‐taxon species richness , 2018, Methods in Ecology and Evolution.

[27]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Metabarcoding of modern soil DNA gives a highly local vegetation signal in Svalbard tundra , 2018, The Holocene.

[28]  H. Insam,et al.  Extracellular DNA in natural environments: features, relevance and applications , 2018, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[29]  C. M. Prosser,et al.  Effects of bioturbation on environmental DNA migration through soil media , 2018, PloS one.

[30]  B. Deagle,et al.  Counting with DNA in metabarcoding studies: How should we convert sequence reads to dietary data? , 2018, bioRxiv.

[31]  N. Yoccoz,et al.  Plant DNA metabarcoding of lake sediments: How does it represent the contemporary vegetation , 2018, PloS one.

[32]  Niklaus E. Zimmermann,et al.  Accelerated increase in plant species richness on mountain summits is linked to warming , 2018, Nature.

[33]  Charles K. Lee,et al.  Evidence of plant and animal communities at exposed and subglacial (cave) geothermal sites in Antarctica , 2018, Polar Biology.

[34]  Kristy Deiner,et al.  Environmental DNA metabarcoding: Transforming how we survey animal and plant communities , 2017, Molecular ecology.

[35]  G. Ficetola,et al.  Ancient plant DNA in lake sediments. , 2017, The New phytologist.

[36]  N. Yoccoz,et al.  Not only mosses: lemming winter diets as described by DNA metabarcoding , 2017, Polar Biology.

[37]  R. Allaby,et al.  A new model for ancient DNA decay based on paleogenomic meta-analysis , 2017, bioRxiv.

[38]  J. Wiens Climate-Related Local Extinctions Are Already Widespread among Plant and Animal Species , 2016, PLoS biology.

[39]  Peter Slaughter,et al.  codyn: An r package of community dynamics metrics , 2016 .

[40]  Peter M Hollingsworth,et al.  Telling plant species apart with DNA: from barcodes to genomes , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[41]  D. Baird,et al.  Large-Scale Monitoring of Plants through Environmental DNA Metabarcoding of Soil: Recovery, Resolution, and Annotation of Four DNA Markers , 2016, PloS one.

[42]  H. Doi,et al.  Evaluation of the Environmental DNA Method for Estimating Distribution and Biomass of Submerged Aquatic Plants , 2016, PloS one.

[43]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Highly Overlapping Winter Diet in Two Sympatric Lemming Species Revealed by DNA Metabarcoding , 2015, PloS one.

[44]  M. Stech,et al.  DNA barcoding of Arctic bryophytes: an example from the moss genus Dicranum (Dicranaceae, Bryophyta) , 2014, Polar Biology.

[45]  Jacques Ravel,et al.  An improved dual-indexing approach for multiplexed 16S rRNA gene sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq platform , 2014, Microbiome.

[46]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Fifty Thousand Years of Arctic Vegetation and Megafaunal Diet 1 Reconstruction of Arctic Vegetation from Permafrost Samples 121 , 2022 .

[47]  T. Ekrem,et al.  Restricted variation in plant barcoding markers limits identification in closely related bryophyte species , 2013, Molecular ecology resources.

[48]  B. Deagle,et al.  Quantifying sequence proportions in a DNA‐based diet study using Ion Torrent amplicon sequencing: which counts count? , 2013, Molecular ecology resources.

[49]  E. Uuemaa,et al.  Trends in the use of landscape spatial metrics as landscape indicators: A review , 2013 .

[50]  M. Pärtel,et al.  Below‐ground plant species richness: new insights from DNA‐based methods , 2012 .

[51]  P. Taberlet,et al.  DNA from soil mirrors plant taxonomic and growth form diversity. , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[52]  V. I. Gusarov,et al.  New environmental metabarcodes for analysing soil DNA: potential for studying past and present ecosystems , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[53]  N. Yoccoz The future of environmental DNA in ecology , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[54]  M. Pärtel,et al.  Plant species richness belowground: higher richness and new patterns revealed by next‐generation sequencing , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[55]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Environmental DNA , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[56]  A. Barbati,et al.  Contribution of large-scale forest inventories to biodiversity assessment and monitoring , 2011 .

[57]  R. Bertrand,et al.  Changes in plant community composition lag behind climate warming in lowland forests , 2011, Nature.

[58]  R. Ohlemüller,et al.  Rapid Range Shifts of Species Associated with High Levels of Climate Warming , 2011, Science.

[59]  J. Wilson,et al.  Cover plus: ways of measuring plant canopies and the terms used for them , 2011 .

[60]  T. Bruns,et al.  Quantifying microbial communities with 454 pyrosequencing: does read abundance count? , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[61]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Using next‐generation sequencing for molecular reconstruction of past Arctic vegetation and climate , 2010, Molecular ecology resources.

[62]  William A. Walters,et al.  QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data , 2010, Nature Methods.

[63]  X. Ge,et al.  Evaluation of 10 plant barcodes in Bryophyta (Mosses) , 2010 .

[64]  C. Meredieu,et al.  Using cover measurements to estimate aboveground understorey biomass in Maritime pine stands , 2009, Annals of Forest Science.

[65]  J. Ascher,et al.  Extracellular DNA in soil and sediment: fate and ecological relevance , 2009, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[66]  Thierry Vermat,et al.  Power and limitations of the chloroplast trnL (UAA) intron for plant DNA barcoding , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[67]  David A. Wardle,et al.  Understory vegetation as a forest ecosystem driver: evidence from the northern Swedish boreal forest , 2005 .

[68]  W. Barthlott,et al.  Global patterns of plant diversity and floristic knowledge , 2005 .

[69]  T. Økland,et al.  Changes in forest understorey vegetation in Norway related to long-term soil acidification and climatic change , 2004 .

[70]  B. Schmid,et al.  Relationships between productivity, number of shoots and number of species in bryophytes and vascular plants , 2001 .

[71]  R. H. Økland,et al.  Dynamics of understory vegetation in an old-growth boreal coniferous forest, 1988 -1993 , 1996 .

[72]  Rune Halvorsen Økland,et al.  Canonical Correspondence Analysis with variation partitioning: some comments and an application , 1994 .

[73]  Daniel J. Hayesa,et al.  Boreal forests , 2022 .

[74]  M. Monaghan,et al.  Trade- offs between reducing complex terminology and producing accurate interpretations from environmental DNA: Comment on “Environmental DNA: What's behind the term?” , 2021 .

[75]  Erik Framstad Terrestrisk naturovervåking i 2013:Markvegetasjon, epifytter, smågnagere og fugl. Sammenfatning av resultater. , 2019 .

[76]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[77]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research , 1969 .