Non-aqueous nanofiltration: solute rejection in low-polarity binary systems

Abstract The separation characteristics of a dense polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) membrane were studied using alkyl and aromatic solvents and low-polarity, sulphur bearing, organometallic and poly-nuclear aromatic (PNA) solute compounds. Rejection was found to be dependent on trans-membrane pressure, crossflow rate (hydrodynamic conditions), solute size and the degree of swelling induced by the solvent. Rejection increased progressively with pressure whilst a threshold condition was observed above which further increases in crossflow had a negligible influence on rejection. Measurements over the molecular weight range 84–612 g/mol showed the membrane to have a molecular weight cut-off in the region 350–400 g/mol to all but one of the tested PNA compounds (i.e. rubrene). An additional correlation using molecular dimensions instead of molecular weight showed the cut-off size of the membrane to be in the region of 1–2 nm, with all data falling on a well-defined rejection/size curve. Solvent type influenced membrane swelling to an extent dependent on the relative magnitude of the solubility parameters for the solvent and PDMS; similar values led to more swelling, higher fluxes and lower rejections. Results support the concept of viscous solvent flow whilst solute transport could be either predominantly viscous or a combination of viscous and diffusive. With larger molecules, a size exclusion mechanism was dominant. A new model is proposed that takes account of solute transport by a combination of viscous and diffusive mechanisms and this is shown to well represent the experimental data.

[1]  D. R. Paul,et al.  Hydraulic permeation of liquids through swollen polymeric networks. II. Liquid mixtures , 1975 .

[2]  R. L. Riley,et al.  Transport properties of cellulose acetate osmotic membranes , 1965 .

[3]  C. Vandecasteele,et al.  A Comparison of Models to Describe the Maximal Retention of Organic Molecules in Nanofiltration , 2000 .

[4]  Justin T. Scarpello,et al.  The separation of homogeneous organometallic catalysts using solvent resistant nanofiltration , 2002 .

[5]  P. Schaetzel,et al.  Sorption, diffusion and vapor permeation of various penetrants through dense poly(dimethylsiloxane) membranes: a transport analysis , 1994 .

[6]  Lloyd S. White,et al.  Transport properties of a polyimide solvent resistant nanofiltration membrane , 2002 .

[7]  Dibakar Bhattacharyya,et al.  Solute transport in solvent-resistant nanofiltration membranes for non-aqueous systems: experimental results and the role of solute–solvent coupling , 2002 .

[8]  Andrew G. Livingston,et al.  Observations on solvent flux and solute rejection across solvent resistant nanofiltration membranes , 2002 .

[9]  J. G. Wijmans,et al.  The solution-diffusion model: a review , 1995 .

[10]  Dibakar Bhattacharyya,et al.  Performance of solvent-resistant membranes for non-aqueous systems: solvent permeation results and modeling , 2001 .

[11]  B. Van der Bruggen,et al.  Fluxes and rejections for nanofiltration with solvent stable polymeric membranes in water, ethanol and n-hexane , 2002 .

[12]  Munir Cheryan,et al.  Solvent recovery and partial deacidification of vegetable oils by membrane technology , 1996 .

[13]  Matthias Wessling,et al.  Insight into the transport of hexane-solute systems through tailor-made composite membranes , 2004 .

[14]  F. P. Cuperus,et al.  Acetone-stable nanofiltration membranes in deacidifying vegetable oil , 1999 .

[15]  Shoji Kimura,et al.  ANALYSIS OF SOLUTES REJECTION IN ULTRAFILTRATION , 1981 .

[16]  Evidence for swelling-induced pore structure in dense PDMS nanofiltration membranes , 2004 .