3D imaging for museum artefacts: a portable test object for heritage and museum documentation of small objects

3D colour image data generated for the recording of small museum objects and archaeological finds are highly variable in quality and fitness for purpose. Whilst current technology is capable of extremely high quality outputs, there are currently no common standards or applicable guidelines in either the museum or engineering domain suited to scientific evaluation, understanding and tendering for 3D colour digital data. This paper firstly explains the rationale towards and requirements for 3D digital documentation in museums. Secondly it describes the design process, development and use of a new portable test object suited to sensor evaluation and the provision of user acceptance metrics. The test object is specifically designed for museums and heritage institutions and includes known surface and geometric properties which support quantitative and comparative imaging on different systems. The development for a supporting protocol will allow object reference data to be included in the data processing workflow with specific reference to conservation and curation.

[1]  J. Hothmer Book reviewInternational archives of photogrammetry and remote sensing: ISPRS, Editor S. Murai: volume 27 part A, Tokyo-Japan-Japan 1989 , 1989 .

[2]  Mona Hess,et al.  Re-engineering Watt: A case study and best practice recommendations for 3D colour laser scans and 3D printing in museum artefact documentation , 2013 .

[3]  Mona Hess,et al.  3D Recording and Museums , 2012 .

[4]  Stuart Robson,et al.  Periodic photogrammetric monitoring and surface reconstruction of a historical wood panel painting for restoration purposes , 2004 .

[5]  J. Beraldina,et al.  Best Practices for the 3 D Documentation of the Grotta dei Cervi of Porto Badisco , Italy , 2011 .

[6]  Xiaoyi Jiang,et al.  3D imaging and applications , 2004 .

[7]  Mona Hess,et al.  Well Connected to Your Digital Object? E-Curator: A Web-based e-Science Platform for Museum Artefacts , 2011, Lit. Linguistic Comput..

[8]  Mona Hess,et al.  Interdisciplinary research project. Fragmentary Mural Paintings; Digital Documentation, Possibilities of Aesthetic Presentation and Exemplary Communication , 2007 .

[9]  Francois Blais,et al.  Proposed procedure for a distance protocol in support of ASTM-E57 standards activities on 3D imaging , 2009, Electronic Imaging.

[10]  Melissa Terras,et al.  Digital Humanities in Practice , 2012 .

[11]  S Macdonald,et al.  A Space for Innovation and Experimentation: University Museums as Test Beds for New Digital Technologies , 2012 .

[12]  J.-Angelo Beraldin,et al.  Proposed NRC portable target case for short-range triangulation-based 3D imaging systems characterization , 2011, Electronic Imaging.

[13]  Stuart Robson,et al.  3D colour imaging for cultural heritage artefacts , 2010 .

[14]  J.-Angelo Beraldin,et al.  Best practices for the 3D documentation of the Grotta dei Cervi of Porto Badisco, Italy , 2011, Electronic Imaging.

[15]  Francois Blais,et al.  TRACEABLE 3D IMAGING METROLOGY: EVALUATION OF 3D DIGITIZING TECHNIQUES IN A DEDICATED METROLOGY LABORATORY , 2007 .

[16]  Luc Cournoyer,et al.  Hierarchical characterization procedures for dimensional metrology , 2011, Electronic Imaging.

[17]  A. Brownhill,et al.  Performance study of non-contact surface measurement technology for use in an experimental fusion device , 2009, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[18]  Lindsay W. MacDonald,et al.  Artefacts for optical surface measurement , 2011, Optical Metrology.

[19]  Stuart Robson,et al.  Measurement of transparent plastic sculptures using photogrammetry, laser scanning and touch probing for conservation purposes , 2008 .