Inferring Particle Interaction Physical Models and Their Dynamical Properties

We propose a framework based on port-Hamiltonian modeling formalism aimed at learning interaction models between particles (or networked systems) and dynamical properties such as trajectory symmetries and conservation laws of the ensemble (or swarm). The learning process is based on approaches and platforms used for large scale optimization and uses features such as automatic differentiation to compute gradients of optimization loss functions. We showcase our approach on the Cucker-Smale particle interaction model, which is first represented in a port-Hamiltonian form, and for which we re-discover the interaction model, and learn dynamical properties that are previously proved analytically. Our approach has the potential for discovering novel particle cooperation rules that can be extracted and used in cooperative control system applications.

[1]  J. Baras Group Invariance and Symmetries in Nonlinear Control and Estimation , 2001 .

[2]  Craig W. Reynolds Flocks, herds, and schools: a distributed behavioral model , 1987, SIGGRAPH.

[3]  Johan de Kleer,et al.  Learning constitutive equations of physical components with predefined feasibility conditions , 2019, 2019 American Control Conference (ACC).

[4]  G. Bluman,et al.  Symmetry and Integration Methods for Differential Equations , 2002 .

[5]  Arjan van der Schaft,et al.  Interconnection of port-Hamiltonian systems and composition of Dirac structures , 2007, Autom..

[6]  Johan de Kleer,et al.  Learning constitutive equations of physical components with constraints discovery , 2018, 2018 Annual American Control Conference (ACC).

[7]  Ming Zhong,et al.  Nonparametric inference of interaction laws in systems of agents from trajectory data , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Massimo Fornasier,et al.  Particle, kinetic, and hydrodynamic models of swarming , 2010 .

[9]  Zhiping Mao,et al.  Nonlocal Flocking Dynamics: Learning the Fractional Order of PDEs from Particle Simulations , 2018, Communications on Applied Mathematics and Computation.

[10]  조준학,et al.  Growth of human bronchial epithelial cells at an air-liquid interface alters the response to particle exposure , 2013, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[11]  Arjan van der Schaft,et al.  Port-Hamiltonian Systems Theory: An Introductory Overview , 2014, Found. Trends Syst. Control..

[12]  S. Brunton,et al.  Discovering governing equations from data by sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Hod Lipson,et al.  Automated reverse engineering of nonlinear dynamical systems , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Arjan van der Schaft,et al.  Port-Hamiltonian Systems on Graphs , 2011, SIAM J. Control. Optim..

[15]  A. Mouchet Applications of Noether conservation theorem to Hamiltonian systems , 2015, 1601.01610.

[16]  G. Bluman,et al.  Applications of Symmetry Methods to Partial Differential Equations , 2009 .

[17]  J. A. Carrillo,et al.  A new interaction potential for swarming models , 2012, 1204.2567.

[18]  Luca Antiga,et al.  Automatic differentiation in PyTorch , 2017 .

[19]  Juan Luis Varona,et al.  Port-Hamiltonian systems: an introductory survey , 2006 .

[20]  Jakob Schwichtenberg,et al.  Physics from Symmetry , 2015 .

[21]  John S. Baras,et al.  A fresh look at network science: Interdependent multigraphs models inspired from statistical physics , 2014, International Symposium on Communications, Control and Signal Processing.