With the expansion ofpollution-prevention initiatives in the government sector, development of certification and eco-labeling mechanisms in foreign trade, and the emergence of green market drivers for consumer demand, industry is under increasing pressure to evaluate the life-cycle waste streams which emanate from their products and manufacturing processes. While much research has been devoted to the study of system-level design-for-environment (i.e. design for disassembly, serviceability, modularity), little attention has been given to the influence of planning and design decisions at the unit manufacturing process level, which has a significant impact on waste streams through material, catalyst, parameter and feature selection decisions. One of the most pressing issues in environmentally-conscious manufacturing is the ability to compare the environmental impacts of dissimilar waste streams to formulate the above decisions. This paper presents an overview of the hierarchical levels of comparative waste assessment which links process-level emissions to immediate, site-wide, and eco-system impacts. Significant issues to be addressed are: (1) the aggregation of data collection required for each level of decision-making, (2) the range of environmental effects needed to be analyzed at each level, (3) the uncertainty present at different levels of data aggregation, (4) the influence of site-specific (fate and transport) factors, and (5) the transformation of environmental information into metrics usable in detailed design and planning of products and processes. Case studies in the fabrication of metal parts and printed circuit boards are presented.
[1]
D. Mackay,et al.
Evaluating the multimedia fate of organic chemicals: a level III fugacity model
,
1991
.
[2]
W. Eversheim,et al.
A Key Issue in Product Life Cycle: Disassembly
,
1993
.
[3]
T. Power.
For the Common Good: Redirecting the Economy toward Community, the Environment, and a Sustainable Future
,
1993
.
[4]
Reinout Heijungs,et al.
A proposal for the classification of toxic substances within the framework of life cycle assessment of products
,
1993
.
[5]
F. Schmidt‐bleek.
Wieviel Umwelt braucht der Mensch
,
1994
.
[6]
D. Alting,et al.
The Life Cycle Concept as a Basis for Sustainable Industrial Production
,
1993
.
[7]
M. Narodoslawsky,et al.
The sustainable process index (SPI) : A measure for process industries
,
1994
.
[8]
T.E. Graedel,et al.
Implementing industrial ecology
,
1993,
IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.
[9]
K. V. Lo,et al.
A life‐cycle inventory of baby diapers subject to Canadian conditions
,
1994
.
[10]
Thomas L. Saaty,et al.
Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation
,
1990
.
[11]
R. L. Tatken,et al.
Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances
,
1986
.
[12]
Friedrich Hinterberger,et al.
Increasing resource productivity through eco-efficient services
,
1993
.
[13]
P. Sheng,et al.
An analytical approach for determining the environmental impact of machining processes
,
1995
.