In-plane bismuth breast shields for pediatric CT: effects on radiation dose and image quality using experimental and clinical data.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of our study was to evaluate the amount of radiation dose reduction and its effect on image quality when using an in-plane bismuth breast shield for multidetector CT (MDCT) of the chest and abdomen in female pediatric patients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Fifty consecutive MDCT examinations (chest, 29; abdomen, 21) of female pediatric patients (mean age, 9 years; range, 2 months-18 years) were performed with a 2-ply (1.7 g of bismuth per square centimeter) bismuth shield (three sizes to accommodate patients of varying sizes) overlying the patient's breasts. MDCT images were evaluated for a perceptible difference in image quality in the lungs at the anatomic level under the shield as compared with nonshielded lung and whether the images were of diagnostic quality. In addition, 2-mm regions of interest were placed in the peripheral anterior and posterior portions of each lung in shielded and nonshielded areas, and noise (standard deviation in Hounsfield units) was measured in the regions. Differences among the regions in noise were compared for shielded versus nonshielded areas (paired t test). To measure differences in actual dose, we also evaluated the breast shield with an infant anthropomorphic phantom using thermoluminescent detectors in the breast tissue. The phantom was imaged with and without the breast shield using identical MDCT parameters. RESULTS All MDCT scans of patients were of diagnostic quality with no perceptible difference in image quality in shielded versus nonshielded lung. We found no statistically significant difference in noise between the shielded and nonshielded lung regions of interest (shielded: mean noise, 17.3 H; nonshielded: mean noise, 18.8 H; p = 0.5180). Phantom measurements revealed a 29% reduction in radiation dose to the breast when a medium-dose MDCT protocol was used. CONCLUSION Bismuth in-plane breast shielding for pediatric MDCT decreased radiation dose to the breast without qualitative or quantitative changes in image quality.

[1]  J. Boice,et al.  Breast cancer in women with scoliosis exposed to multiple diagnostic x rays. , 1989, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[2]  C. Land,et al.  Incidence of female breast cancer among atomic bomb survivors, 1950-1985. , 1994, Radiation research.

[3]  C A Kelsey,et al.  CT scanning: patterns of use and dose , 2000, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[4]  M. Ambrosino,et al.  Feasibility of high-resolution, low-dose chest CT in evaluating the pediatric chest , 2005, Pediatric Radiology.

[5]  D. Brenner,et al.  Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  D. Roebuck Risk and benefit in paediatric radiology , 1999, Pediatric Radiology.

[7]  I. Kamel,et al.  Radiation dose reduction in CT of the pediatric pelvis. , 1994, Radiology.

[8]  L. F. Rogers Taking care of children: check out the parameters used for helical CT. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  D. Frush,et al.  Reduced frequency of sedation of young children with multisection helical CT. , 2000, Radiology.

[10]  C. Land,et al.  Proliferative and nonproliferative breast disease in atomic bomb survivors. Results of a histopathologic review of autopsy breast tissue , 1993, Cancer.

[11]  G. Enríquez,et al.  Low-dose high-resolution CT of the chest in children and young adults: dose, cooperation, artifact incidence, and image quality. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  D A Pierce,et al.  Studies of the mortality of atomic bomb survivors. Report 12, Part I. Cancer: 1950-1990. , 1996, Radiation research.

[13]  H. Chan,et al.  Normalized average glandular dose in magnification mammography. , 1995, Radiology.

[14]  C. Metreweli,et al.  Radiation risk in CT for acute abdominal pain. , 1998, Radiology.

[15]  K. Hopper,et al.  The breast: in-plane x-ray protection during diagnostic thoracic CT--shielding with bismuth radioprotective garments. , 1997, Radiology.

[16]  P P Fatouros,et al.  Absorbed breast dose: dependence on radiographic modality and technique, and breast thickness. , 1986, Radiology.

[17]  G. Barnes,et al.  Spectral dependence of glandular tissue dose in screen-film mammography. , 1991, Radiology.

[18]  A S Brody,et al.  Minimizing radiation dose for pediatric body applications of single-detector helical CT: strategies at a large Children's Hospital. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  M A Helvie,et al.  Breast thickness in routine mammograms: effect on image quality and radiation dose. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  D. Frush,et al.  Helical CT of the body: are settings adjusted for pediatric patients? , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  B. Modan,et al.  INCREASED RISK OF BREAST CANCER AFTER LOW-DOSE IRRADIATION , 1989, The Lancet.

[22]  C. McCollough,et al.  Breast dose during electron-beam CT: measurement with film dosimetry. , 1995, Radiology.

[23]  Bernd Hamm,et al.  Low-dose spiral CT: applicability to paediatric chest imaging , 1999, Pediatric Radiology.

[24]  M. Tubiana Les effets cancérogènes des faibles doses de radiations , 1999 .