Unsupervised learning with independent component analysis can identify patterns of glaucomatous visual field defects.

PURPOSE We previously reported the use of clustering by unsupervised learning with machine learning classifiers to segment clusters of patterns in standard automated perimetry (SAP) for glaucoma. In this study, the process of unsupervised learning by independent component analysis decomposed SAP field patterns into axes, and the information represented by these axes was evaluated. METHODS SAP fields were obtained with the Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer on 189 normal eyes and 156 eyes with glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON) determined by masked review with stereoscopic optic disc photos. The variational Bayesian independent component analysis mixture model (vB-ICA-mm) partitioned the SAP fields into the most informative number of clusters. Simultaneously, it learned an optimal number of maximally independent axes for each cluster. RESULTS The most informative number of clusters was two. vB-ICA-mm placed 68.6% of the SAP fields from eyes with GON in a cluster labeled G and 98.4% of the fields from eyes with normal optic discs in a cluster labeled N. Cluster G optimally contained six axes. Post hoc analysis of patterns generated at -1 SD and +2 SD from the cluster G mean on the six axes revealed defects similar to those identified by experts as indicative of glaucoma. SAP fields associated with an axis showed increasing severity as they were located farther in the positive direction from the cluster G mean. CONCLUSIONS vB-ICA-mm represented the SAP fields with patterns that were meaningful for glaucoma experts. This process also captured severity in the patterns uncovered. These findings should validate vB-ICA-mm as a data mining technique for new and unfamiliar complex tests.

[1]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Variational Learning of Clusters of Undercomplete Nonsymmetric Independent Components , 2003, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[2]  G. Trick,et al.  Assessing the utility of reliability indices for automated visual fields. Testing ocular hypertensives. , 1989, Ophthalmology.

[3]  Robert N Weinreb,et al.  Using unsupervised learning with variational bayesian mixture of factor analysis to identify patterns of glaucomatous visual field defects. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  D B Henson,et al.  Spatial classification of glaucomatous visual field loss. , 1996, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[5]  M H Goldbaum,et al.  Interpretation of automated perimetry for glaucoma by neural network. , 1994, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[6]  David Mackay,et al.  Probable networks and plausible predictions - a review of practical Bayesian methods for supervised neural networks , 1995 .

[7]  Robert N Weinreb,et al.  Comparing neural networks and linear discriminant functions for glaucoma detection using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy of the optic disc. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[8]  L Brigatti,et al.  Neural networks to identify glaucoma with structural and functional measurements. , 1996, American journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  Robert N Weinreb,et al.  Comparing machine learning classifiers for diagnosing glaucoma from standard automated perimetry. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[10]  Sejnowski,et al.  ICA MIXTURE MODELS FOR UNSUPERVISED CLASSIFICATION AND AUTOMATIC CONTEXT SWITCHING , 2000 .

[11]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Unsupervised machine learning with independent component analysis to identify areas of progression in glaucomatous visual fields. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[12]  Robert N Weinreb,et al.  Using machine learning classifiers to identify glaucomatous change earlier in standard visual fields. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.