Bulletin of the World Health Organization Governance of dual-use research: an ethical dilemma

Scenarios where the results of well-intentioned scientific research can be used for both good and harmful purposes give rise to what is now widely known as the 'dual-use dilemma'. There has been growing debate about the dual-use nature of life science research with implications for making biological weapons. This paper reviews several controversial publications that have been the focus of debates about dual-use life science research and critically examines relevant policy developments, particularly in the United States of America. Though the dual-use dilemma is inherently ethical in nature, the majority of debates about dual-use research have primarily involved science and security experts rather than ethicists. It is important that there is more ethical input into debates about the governance of dual-use research.

[1]  Robert Cook-Deegan,et al.  The Genome Negotiations. (Book Reviews: The Gene Wars. Science, Politics, and the Human Genome.) , 1994 .

[2]  Ralph E. Hoffman,et al.  The Gene Wars: Science, Politics, and the Human Genome , 1996 .

[3]  Steven M. Block,et al.  The Growing Threat of Biological Weapons , 2001, American Scientist.

[4]  A. Ramsay,et al.  Expression of Mouse Interleukin-4 by a Recombinant Ectromelia Virus Suppresses Cytolytic Lymphocyte Responses and Overcomes Genetic Resistance to Mousepox , 2001, Journal of Virology.

[5]  Zhiping Nie,et al.  Variola virus immune evasion design: Expression of a highly efficient inhibitor of human complement , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  A. Paul,et al.  Chemical Synthesis of Poliovirus cDNA: Generation of Infectious Virus in the Absence of Natural Template , 2002, Science.

[7]  Elizabeth George,et al.  Uncensored exchange of scientific results , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  A. Balows.  Biotechnology research—in an age of terrorism , 2004 .

[9]  David E. Swayne,et al.  Characterization of the Reconstructed 1918 Spanish Influenza Pandemic Virus , 2005, Science.

[10]  Donald Kennedy,et al.  Better Never Than Late? , 2023, Arbitration: The International Journal of Arbitration, Mediation and Dispute Management.

[11]  S. K. Green,et al.  Guidelines to Prevent Malevolent Use of Biomedical Research , 2006, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics.

[12]  M. Selgelid.  A Tale of Two Studies Ethics , Bioterrorism , and the Censorship of Science , 2007 .

[13]  T. R. Taylor,et al.  A tale of two studies: the importance of setting, subjects and context in two randomized, controlled trials of a web-based decision support for perimenopausal and postmenopausal health decisions. , 2007, Patient education and counseling.

[14]  Seumas Miller,et al.  Ethical and Philosophical Consideration of the Dual-use Dilemma in the Biological Sciences , 2007, Sci. Eng. Ethics.