Dealing with the Unexpected: Critical Incidents in the LEGO Mindstorms team

This article addresses the relative lack of empirical studies of how self-managed teams in high velocity environments handle unexpected critical incidents. It presents an interpretive case study of the LEGO Mindstorms project team, and focuses in particular on how this team responded to three critical incidents. Our study results in three core findings concerning how this team responded to the unexpected in its high velocity environment. These include: the importance of increasing presence; creating a context for a shared and emotionally grounded identity; and developing a shared set of guiding principles for action, behaviour, and decision-making. The authors further describe interconnections among these three core findings, proposing a higher-level ‘virtuous circle’ that illustrates how this team responded effectively to critical incidents.

[1]  J. Dutton,et al.  KEEPING AN EYE ON THE MIRROR : IMAGE AND IDENTITY IN ORGANIZATIONAL ADAPTATION , 2005 .

[2]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .

[3]  Tim Rowley,et al.  When Will Stakeholder Groups Act? An Interest- and Identity-Based Model of Stakeholder Group Mobilization , 2003 .

[4]  J. Samson.  Bewitched, bothered and bewildered , 2003 .

[5]  Gerardo A. Okhuysen.  Structuring Change: Familiarity and Formal Interventions in Problem-Solving Groups , 2001 .

[6]  Panayiotis Angelides,et al.  The development of an efficient technique for collecting and analyzing qualitative data: The analysis of critical incidents , 2001 .

[7]  Socrates Comes to Market , 2001 .

[8]  J. Roos,et al.  Be Coherent, Not Visionary , 2001 .

[9]  Andrew D. Brown.  Organization Studies and Identity: Towards a Research Agenda , 2001 .

[10]  Karl E. Weick,et al.  Managing the unexpected: Assuring high performance in an age of complexity. , 2001 .

[11]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Strategy as simple rules. , 2001, Harvard business review.

[12]  David Knights,et al.  Bewitched, bothered and bewildered: The meaning and experience of teamworking for employees in an automobile company , 2000 .

[13]  Jay Bal,et al.  Managing the virtual team and controlling effectiveness , 2000 .

[14]  H. Bussell.  Qualitative Methods and Analysis in Organizational Research: A Practical Guide , 2000 .

[15]  Erika D Peterson,et al.  Collective Efficacy and Aspects of Shared Mental Models as Predictors of Performance Over Time in Work Groups , 2000 .

[16]  R. Fisch,et al.  Argumentation and Emotional Processes in Group Decision-Making: Illustration of a Multilevel Interaction Process Analysis Approach , 2000 .

[17]  S. Mohammed,et al.  The Measurement of Team Mental Models: We Have No Shared Schema , 2000 .

[18]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  A Grounded Model of Organizational Schema Change During Empowerment , 2000 .

[19]  Johan Roos,et al.  Striking a balance : complexity and knowledge landscapes , 2000 .

[20]  M. Hogg,et al.  Social Identity and Self-Categorization Processes in Organizational Contexts , 2000 .

[21]  J. Tambling.  How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature and Informatics by N. Katherine Hayles (review) , 2001, Modern Language Review.

[22]  A. Langley.  Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[23]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue: Communication Processes for Virtual Organizations , 1999 .

[24]  M. Waller.  The Timing of Adaptive Group Responses to Nonroutine Events , 1999 .

[25]  S. Procter,et al.  Selling teams to the salesforce: teamworking in the UK pharmaceutical industry , 1999 .

[26]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[27]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Coordination and Collective Mind in Software Requirements Development , 1998, IBM Syst. J..

[28]  William A. Kahn.  Relational systems at work. , 1998 .

[29]  Barbara Czarniawska.  A Narrative Approach to Organization Studies , 1998 .

[30]  R. Wageman.  Critical success factors for creating superb self-managing teams , 1997 .

[31]  Ann T. Jordan.  Critical incident story creation and culture formation in a self‐directed work team , 1996 .

[32]  G. Hogg,et al.  The glory of stories: Using critical incidents to understand service evaluation in the primary healthcare context , 1996 .

[33]  Gerald E. Ledford,et al.  A Predictive Model of Self-Managing Work Team Effectiveness , 1996 .

[34]  Daniel J. McAllister.  Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations , 1995 .

[35]  Mary A. Fukuyama.  Critical Incidents in Multicultural Counseling Supervision: A Phenomenological Approach to Supervision Research , 1994 .

[36]  Charles C. Manz,et al.  From Groupthink to Teamthink: Toward the Creation of Constructive Thought Patterns in Self-Managing Work Teams , 1994 .

[37]  Celia V. Harquail,et al.  Organizational images and member identification. , 1994 .

[38]  J. Pinto,et al.  Antecedents and consequences of project team cross-functional cooperation , 1993 .

[39]  J. Barker.  Tightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Self-Managing Teams , 1993 .

[40]  K. Weick,et al.  Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. , 1993 .

[41]  J. Katzenbach,et al.  The discipline of teams. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[42]  W. Gibb Dyer,et al.  Better Stories, Not Better Constructs, To Generate Better Theory: A Rejoinder to Eisenhardt , 1991 .

[43]  H. Tsoukas.  The Validity of Idiographic Research Explanations , 1989 .

[44]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[45]  Fred A. Mael,et al.  Social identity theory and the organization , 1989 .

[46]  M. Diamond.  Organizational Identity , 1988 .

[47]  Susan C. Schneider,et al.  Basic Assumptions Themes in Organizations , 1988 .

[48]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Strategic decision processes in high velocity environments: four cases in the microcomputer industry , 1988 .

[49]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[50]  S. Worchel,et al.  Psychology of intergroup relations , 1986 .

[51]  J. K. Murnighan,et al.  The Emergence of Norms in Competitive Decision-Making Groups. , 1985 .

[52]  A. Giddens.  The Constitution of Society , 1985 .

[53]  J. Bartunek.  Changing Interpretive Schemes and Organizational Restructuring: The Example of a Religious Order , 1984 .

[54]  Janice R. Kelly,et al.  The social psychology of time: Entrainment of behavior in social and organizational settings. , 1984 .

[55]  D. C. Feldman,et al.  The Development and Enforcement of Group Norms , 1984 .

[56]  P. Reason,et al.  Human inquiry : a sourcebook of new paradigm research , 1983 .

[57]  Lawrence B. Mohr,et al.  Explaining organizational behavior , 1982 .

[58]  E. Shils.  The Constitution Of Society , 1982 .

[59]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live by , 1982 .

[60]  D Light.  Surface data and deep structure: observing the organization of professional training. , 1979, Administrative science quarterly.

[61]  R. Abelson.  Script processing in attitude formation and decision making. , 1976 .

[62]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[63]  Raymond J. Corsini,et al.  Critical incidents in teaching , 1964 .

[64]  E. Goffman.  Behavior in Public Places , 1963 .

[65]  J. C. Flanagan.  Psychological Bulletin THE CRITICAL INCIDENT TECHNIQUE , 2022 .