Explaining Public Goods Game Contributions with Rational Ability

As the link between psychology and economics has grown, so too has research on the link between personality traits and economic behavior. We build on this previous work, bringing to light the relationship between personality traits and contributions in a one-shot public goods game. We find that contributions to the public good are smaller for rational participants as measured by the Rational-Experiential Inventory—revised 40 (REI-40) item scale. We find no effect on contributions for the measures of the Big Five personality traits or the remaining measures from the REI-40.

[1]  James M. Walker,et al.  Group size and the voluntary provision of public goods : Experimental evidence utilizing large groups , 1994 .

[2]  S. Epstein,et al.  Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  Hiroaki Fujimoto,et al.  Framing effects and gender differences in voluntary public goods provision experiments , 2010 .

[4]  A. Forster,et al.  Experiential and rational decision making: a survey to determine how emergency physicians make clinical decisions , 2011, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[5]  M. Milinski,et al.  Volunteering leads to rock–paper–scissors dynamics in a public goods game , 2003, Nature.

[6]  P. Phillips,et al.  Age and gender differences in preferences for rational and experiential thinking , 2010 .

[7]  Marco Perugini,et al.  Which is the More Predictable Gender? Public Good Contribution and Personality , 2005 .

[8]  Avner Ben-Ner,et al.  Personality and altruism in the dictator game: Relationship to giving to kin, collaborators, competitors, and neutrals , 2011 .

[9]  S. Gächter,et al.  Reciprocity and the Tragedies of Maintaining and Providing the Commons , 2017, Nature Human Behaviour.

[10]  Charles A. Holt,et al.  Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects , 2002 .

[11]  Gregory J. DeAngelo,et al.  Intergroup Solidarity and Local Public Goods Provision: An Experiment , 2016 .

[12]  Michael Argyle,et al.  HAPPINESS AND COOPERATION , 1991 .

[13]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  Another advanced test of theory of mind: evidence from very high functioning adults with autism or asperger syndrome. , 1997, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[14]  Winfried Ruigrok,et al.  Temporal stability and psychological foundations of cooperation preferences , 2012 .

[15]  Winfried Ruigrok,et al.  Personality, personal values and cooperation preferences in public goods games: A longitudinal study , 2011 .

[16]  S Epstein,et al.  The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  James Andreoni,et al.  Why free ride?: Strategies and learning in public goods experiments , 1988 .

[18]  Jordan B. Peterson,et al.  Extraversion, neuroticism, and the prisoner’s dilemma , 2009 .

[19]  J. Andreoni.  Cooperation in Public-Goods Experiments: Kindness or Confusion? , 1995 .

[20]  Esmail Bonakdarian,et al.  Walk the Talk? The Effect of Voting and Excludability in Public Goods Experiments , 2010 .

[21]  Douglas N. Jackson,et al.  Kin Altruism, Reciprocal Altruism, and the Big Five Personality Factors , 1998 .

[22]  O. John,et al.  Big Five Inventory , 2012, Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences.

[23]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  The Cambridge Mindreading (CAM) Face-Voice Battery: Testing Complex Emotion Recognition in Adults with and without Asperger Syndrome , 2006, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[24]  L. Putterman,et al.  Cooperation Under the Threat of Expulsion in a Public Goods Experiment , 2005 .

[25]  O. John,et al.  Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: multitrait multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  J. Lohse.  Smart or Selfish - When Smart Guys Finish Nice , 2014 .

[27]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  The "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" Test revised version: a study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. , 2001, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[28]  O. John,et al.  Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. , 2008 .

[29]  E. Fehr,et al.  Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments , 1999, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[30]  Robert Kurzban,et al.  Individual differences in cooperation in a circular public goods game , 2001 .

[31]  L. Hansen,et al.  Framing and Misperception in Public Good Experiments , 2017 .

[32]  Eliciting risk attitudes – how to avoid mean and variance bias in Holt-and-Laury lotteries , 2014 .

[33]  J. Zelmer.  Linear Public Goods Experiments: A Meta-Analysis , 2003 .

[34]  R. Bentall,et al.  Persecutory beliefs, attributions and theory of mind: comparison of patients with paranoid delusions, Asperger's syndrome and healthy controls , 2004, Schizophrenia Research.

[35]  Eun Soo Park,et al.  Warm-glow versus cold-prickle: a further experimental study of framing effects on free-riding , 2000 .

[36]  H. Abdi.  The Bonferonni and Šidák Corrections for Multiple Comparisons , 2006 .

[37]  D. Murphy,et al.  Theory of mind in Asperger's syndrome, schizophrenia and personality disordered forensic patients , 2006, Cognitive neuropsychiatry.

[38]  Avner Ben-Ner,et al.  Share and share alike? Gender-pairing, personality, and cognitive ability as determinants of giving , 2004 .