The role of trust in automation reliance

[1]  Linda G. Pierce,et al.  The Perceived Utility of Human and Automated Aids in a Visual Detection Task , 2002, Hum. Factors.

[2]  Linda G. Pierce,et al.  Predicting Misuse and Disuse of Combat Identification Systems , 2001 .

[3]  Colin G. Drury,et al.  Foundations for an Empirically Determined Scale of Trust in Automated Systems , 2000 .

[4]  N. Moray,et al.  Adaptive automation, trust, and self-confidence in fault management of time-critical tasks. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[5]  Ellen Timminga,et al.  Persuasiveness of expert systems , 1998, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[6]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse , 1997, Hum. Factors.

[7]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Expertise in context: human and machine , 1997 .

[8]  Michael J. Prietula,et al.  The Turing effect: the nature of trust in expert systems advice , 1997 .

[9]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Beyond Bipolar Conceptualizations and Measures: The Case of Attitudes and Evaluative Space , 1997, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[10]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Automation-induced monitoring inefficiency: role of display location , 1997, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[11]  Mustapha Mouloua,et al.  Effects of Adaptive Task Allocation on Monitoring of Automated Systems , 1996, Hum. Factors.

[12]  Victor A. Riley,et al.  Operator reliance on automation: Theory and data. , 1996 .

[13]  K. Mosier,et al.  Human Decision Makers and Automated Decision Aids: Made for Each Other? , 1996 .

[14]  Mustapha Mouloua,et al.  Automation and Human Performance : Theory and Applications , 1996 .

[15]  Bonnie M. Muir,et al.  Trust in automation. I: Theoretical issues in the study of trust and human intervention in automated systems , 1994 .

[16]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: A critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. , 1994 .

[17]  George M. Kasper,et al.  The design of joint cognitive systems: the effect of cognitive coupling on performance , 1994, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[18]  Philip J. Smith,et al.  Design of a Cooperative Problem-Solving System for En-Route Flight Planning: An Empirical Evaluation , 1994 .

[19]  John D. Lee,et al.  Trust, self-confidence, and operators' adaptation to automation , 1994, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[20]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Automation- Induced "Complacency": Development of the Complacency-Potential Rating Scale , 1993 .

[21]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Performance Consequences of Automation-Induced 'Complacency' , 1993 .

[22]  N Moray,et al.  Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems. , 1992, Ergonomics.

[23]  G. Peeters,et al.  Positive-Negative Asymmetry in Evaluations: The Distinction Between Affective and Informational Negativity Effects , 1990 .

[24]  R I Thackray,et al.  Detection efficiency on an air traffic control monitoring task with and without computer aiding. , 1989, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[25]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  TRUSTWORTHINESS OF COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEMS , 1988 .

[26]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Human-Computer Monitoring , 1987 .

[27]  Bonnie M. Muir,et al.  Trust Between Humans and Machines, and the Design of Decision Aids , 1987, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[28]  D. C. Howell Statistical Methods for Psychology , 1987 .

[29]  C. Stangor,et al.  Stalking the elusive schema: Insights from developmental and social-psychological analyses of gender schemas. , 1986 .

[30]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  J. G. Holmes,et al.  Trust in close relationships. , 1985 .

[32]  David D. Woods,et al.  Systems with Human Monitors: A Signal Detection Analysis , 1985, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[33]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .

[34]  A. Graesser,et al.  Memory for actions in scripted activities as a function of typicality, retention interval, and retrieval task , 1981, Memory & cognition.

[35]  D. Corcoran,et al.  Cooperation of listener and computer in a recognition task. II. Effects of computer reliability and "dependent" versus "independent" conditions. , 1972, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  J. Bruner,et al.  THE PERCEPTION OF PEOPLE , 1954 .

[37]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .