Advances on fission chamber modelling

In-vessel, online neutron flux measurements are routinely performed in mock-up and material testing reactors by fission chambers. Those measurements have a wide range of applications, including characterization of experimental conditions, reactor monitoring and safety. Depending on the application, detectors may experience a wide range of constraints, of several magnitudes, in term of neutron flux, gamma-ray flux, temperature. Hence, designing a specific fission chamber and measuring chain for a given application is a demanding task. It can be achieved by a combination of experimental feedback and simulating tools, the latter being based on a comprehensive understanding of the underlying physics. A computation route that simulates fission chambers, named CHESTER, is presented. The retrieved quantities of interest are the neutron-induced charge spectrum, the electronic and ionic pulses, the mean current and variance, the power spectrum. It relies on the GARFIELD suite, originally developped for drift chambers, and makes use of the MAGBOLTZ code to assess the drift parameters of electrons within the filling gas, and the SRIM code to evaluate the stopping range of fission products. The effect of the gamma flux is also estimated. Computations made with several fission chambers examplify the possibilities of the route. A good qualitative agreement is obtained when comparing the results with the experimental data available to date. In a near future, a comprehensive experimental programme will be undertaken to qualify the route using the known neutron sources, mock-up reactors and wide choice of fission chambers, with a stress on the predictivity of the Campbelling mode. Depending on the results, a refinement of the modelling and an effort on the accuracy of input data are also to be considered. CHESTER will then make it possible to predict the overall sensitivity of a chamber, and to optimize the design for a given application. Another benefit will be to increase the lifetime of fission chambers and perform an early diagnosis of failures.

[1]  L. Vermeeren,et al.  New measurement system for on line in core high-energy neutron flux monitoring in materials testing reactor conditions. , 2011, The Review of scientific instruments.

[2]  A. Bertin,et al.  Experimental study on the energy loss in argon of /sup 252/Cf fission fragments , 1976 .

[3]  Walker,et al.  Systematics of fission fragment total kinetic energy release. , 1985, Physical review. C, Nuclear physics.

[4]  H. O. Wyckoff,et al.  The International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements , 2001, Journal of the ICRU.

[5]  A. Letourneau,et al.  Improvements in the Modeling of Sub-Miniature Fission Chambers Operated in Current Mode , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[6]  Edward A. Mason,et al.  Transport Properties of Gaseous Ions over a Wide Energy Range , 1976 .

[7]  Total prompt energy release in the neutron-induced fission of 235 U, 238 U, and 239 Pu , 2006, nucl-th/0603071.

[8]  C. Ferretti.  Performance of The ATLAS Muon Spectrometer During the Commissioning , 2010 .

[9]  N. García-Herranz,et al.  Assessment of fissionable material behaviour in fission chambers , 2010 .

[10]  L. Vermeeren,et al.  Reasons why Plutonium 242 is the best fission chamber deposit to monitor the fast component of a high neutron flux , 2008 .

[11]  J. K. Knipp,et al.  On the Ionization Yields of Heavy Particles , 1951 .

[12]  G. Bignan,et al.  Development and Modeling of Neutron Detectors for In-Core Measurement Requirements in Nuclear Reactors , 2001 .

[13]  P. Bogdanovich,et al.  Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables , 2013 .

[14]  H. Schmitt,et al.  IONIZATION VS ENERGY RELATION FOR FISSION FRAGMENTS , 1956 .

[15]  J. Villard,et al.  Method to calibrate fission chambers in Campbelling mode , 2011, 2011 2nd International Conference on Advancements in Nuclear Instrumentation, Measurement Methods and their Applications.

[16]  C. Jammes,et al.  Irradiation tests in BR2 of miniature fission chambers in pulse, Campbelling and current mode , 2011, 2011 2nd International Conference on Advancements in Nuclear Instrumentation, Measurement Methods and their Applications.

[17]  S. Chabod.  Saturation current of miniaturized fission chambers , 2009 .

[18]  Miss A.O. Penney.  (b) , 1974, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[19]  Sue Birchmore,et al.  Garfield , 2007, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[20]  R. Veenhof,et al.  Garfield, recent developments , 1998 .

[21]  P. Filliatre,et al.  On the impact of the fissile coating on the fission chamber signal , 2012 .

[22]  Benoit Geslot,et al.  Stopping power of fission fragments of 252Cf in argon: A comparison between experiments and simulation with the SRIM code , 2010 .

[23]  S. Chabod,et al.  Modelling of fission chambers in current mode¿Analytical approach , 2006 .

[24]  J. Ziegler.  THE STOPPING AND RANGE OF IONS IN SOLIDS , 1988 .

[25]  S. F. Biagi,et al.  MONTE CARLO SIMULATION OF ELECTRON DRIFT AND DIFFUSION IN COUNTING GASES UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC FIELDS , 1999 .

[26]  D. Fourmentel,et al.  Estimating the γ‐ray contribution to the signal of fission chambers with Monte Carlo simulations , 2011 .

[27]  Alain Lebrun,et al.  Modeling of the saturation current of a fission chamber taking into account the distorsion of electric field due to space charge effects , 1999 .