Durable diamond-like carbon templates for UV nanoimprint lithography

The interaction between resist and template during the separation process after nanoimprint lithography (NIL) can cause the formation of defects and damage to the templates and resist patterns. To alleviate these problems, fluorinated self-assembled monolayers (F-SAMs, i.e. tridecafluoro-1,1,2,2,tetrahydrooctyl trichlorosilane or FDTS) have been employed as template release coatings. However, we find that the FDTS coating undergoes irreversible degradation after only 10 cycles of UV nanoimprint processes with SU-8 resist. The degradation includes a 28% reduction in surface F atoms and significant increases in the surface roughness. In this paper, diamond-like carbon (DLC) films were investigated as an alternative material not only for coating but also for direct fabrication of nanoimprint templates. DLC films deposited on quartz templates in a plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition system are shown to have better chemical and physical stability than FDTS. After the same 10 cycles of UV nanoimprints, the surface composition as well as the roughness of DLC films were found to be unchanged. The adhesion energy between the DLC surface and SU-8 is found to be smaller than that of FDTS despite the slightly higher total surface energy of DLC. DLC templates with 40 nm features were fabricated using e-beam lithography followed by Cr lift-off and reactive ion etching. UV nanoimprinting using the directly patterned DLC templates in SU-8 resist demonstrates good pattern transfer fidelity and easy template-resist separation. These results indicate that DLC is a promising material for fabricating durable templates for UV nanoimprint lithography.

[1]  R. Chambers,et al.  Surface Defluorination of PTFE by Sodium Atoms , 1994 .

[2]  D. K. Owens,et al.  Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers , 1969 .

[3]  J. Robertson Diamond-like amorphous carbon , 2002 .

[4]  B. Krauskopf,et al.  Proc of SPIE , 2003 .

[5]  Walter Hu,et al.  Deposition and patterning of diamondlike carbon as antiwear nanoimprint templates , 2006 .

[6]  C. Willson,et al.  Step and flash imprint lithography: Template surface treatment and defect analysis , 2000 .

[7]  Frances A. Houle,et al.  Adhesion between template materials and UV-cured nanoimprint resists , 2006, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[8]  Dolores C. Miller,et al.  Antiadhesion considerations for UV nanoimprint lithography , 2007 .

[9]  K. Sarveswaran,et al.  Sub-10 nm electron beam lithography using cold development of poly(methylmethacrylate) , 2004 .

[10]  Heinrich Kurz,et al.  Reproducibility and homogeneity in step and repeat UV-nanoimprint lithography , 2004 .

[11]  R Stanley Williams,et al.  Vapor-phase self-assembled monolayer for improved mold release in nanoimprint lithography. , 2005, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[12]  Brian Evans,et al.  FTIR and AFM Studies of the Kinetics and Self-Assembly of Alkyltrichlorosilanes and (Perfluoroalkyl)trichlorosilanes onto Glass and Silicon , 1995 .

[13]  C. Tripp,et al.  Effect of fluoroalkyl substituents on the reaction of alkylchlorosilanes with silica surfaces , 1993 .

[14]  Bernard Choi,et al.  Step and flash imprint lithography: a new approach to high-resolution patterning , 1999, Advanced Lithography.