Trends in Educational Research about e-Learning: A Systematic Literature Review (2009–2018)

The concept of e-learning is a technology-mediated learning approach of great potential from the educational perspective and it has been one of the main research lines of Educational Technology in the last decades. The aim of the present systematic literature review (SLR) was to identify (a) the research topics; (b) the most relevant theories; (c) the most researched modalities; and (d) the research methodologies used. To this end, the PRISMA protocol was followed, and different tools were used for the bibliographic management and text-mining. The literature selection was carried out in three first-quartile journals indexed in JCR-SSCI specialized in Educational Technology. A total of 248 articles composed the final sample. The analysis of the texts identified three main nodes: (a) online students; (b) online teachers; and (c) curriculum-interactive learning environments. It was revealed that MOOC was the most researched e-learning modality. The Community of Inquiry and the Technological Acceptance Model, were the most used theories in the analyzed studies. The most frequent methodology was case study. Finally, the conclusions regarding the objectives of our SRL are presented: Main themes and research sub-themes, most researched e-learning modality, most relevant theoretical frameworks on e-learning, and typologies of research methodologies.

[1]  Jacob Cohen.  A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[2]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[3]  S. Al-Athel,et al.  Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: "Our Common Future" , 1987 .

[4]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Development and Test of a Theory of Technological Learning and Usage , 1992 .

[5]  Amal Mudallali.  Statement , 1988, Definitions.

[6]  Design-Based Research: An Emerging Paradigm for Educational Inquiry , 2003 .

[7]  Terry Anderson,et al.  E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Community of Inquiry Framework for Research and Practice , 2016 .

[8]  G. Fletcher.  The Future of E-Learning , 2004 .

[9]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  Research and trends in the field of e-learning from 2001 to 2005: A content analysis of cognitive studies in selected journals , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[10]  William Wresch,et al.  Research in online and blended learning in the business disciplines: Key findings and possible future directions , 2009, Internet High. Educ..

[11]  Peter Shea,et al.  Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster "epistemic engagement" and "cognitive presence" in online education , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[12]  Blended Learning as a Transformative Design Approach , 2009 .

[13]  T. C. Edwin Cheng,et al.  The role of perceived user-interface design in continued usage intention of self-paced e-learning tools , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[14]  Peter Smith,et al.  Contemporary Perspectives in E‐learning Research: Themes, Methods and Impact on Practice , 2009 .

[15]  A. Cartelli,et al.  The Identification of Key Issues in the Development of Sustainable e-Learning and Virtual Campus Initiatives , 2009 .

[16]  A. Artino,et al.  Academic motivation and self-regulation: A comparative analysis of undergraduate and graduate students learning online , 2009, Internet High. Educ..

[17]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping , 2009, Scientometrics.

[18]  Hsi-Peng Lu,et al.  The impact of individual differences on e-learning system satisfaction: A contingency approach , 2010, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[19]  Hermann A. Maurer,et al.  Research trends in the field of e-learning from 2003 to 2008: A scientometric and content analysis for selected journals and conferences using visualization , 2010, Interact. Technol. Smart Educ..

[20]  George Bradford,et al.  Online learning and student satisfaction: Academic standing, ethnicity and their influence on facilitated learning, engagement, and information fluency , 2010, Internet High. Educ..

[21]  A. Artino.  Online or face-to-face learning? Exploring the personal factors that predict students' choice of instructional format , 2010, Internet High. Educ..

[22]  Jung Wan Lee.  Online support service quality, online learning acceptance, and student satisfaction , 2010, Internet High. Educ..

[23]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective , 2010, Internet High. Educ..

[24]  Timothy Teo.  A structural equation modelling of factors influencing student teachers' satisfaction with e-learning , 2010, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[25]  Jane Seale,et al.  E-learning and accessibility: An exploration of the potential role of generic pedagogical tools , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[26]  Meng Chang Chen,et al.  Extending the TAM model to explore the factors that affect Intention to Use an Online Learning Community , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[27]  A. P. Rovai,et al.  Why some distance education programs fail while others succeed in a global environment , 2010, Internet High. Educ..

[28]  Fengfeng Ke,et al.  Examining online teaching, cognitive, and social presence for adult students , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[29]  Stefan Hrastinski,et al.  Design exemplars for synchronous e-learning: A design theory approach , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[30]  James Kariuki Njenga,et al.  The myths about e-learning in higher education , 2010, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[31]  Olivier Le Bohec,et al.  Procrastination, participation, and performance in online learning environments , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[32]  Sarah J. Stein,et al.  Conceptions of e-learning and professional development for e-learning held by tertiary educators in New Zealand , 2011, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[33]  Hasan Çakir,et al.  Research in online learning environments: Priorities and methodologies , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[34]  Kyu Yon Lim,et al.  Online university students' satisfaction and persistence: Examining perceived level of presence, usefulness and ease of use as predictors in a structural model , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[35]  Jungjoo Kim,et al.  Investigating factors that influence social presence and learning outcomes in distance higher education , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[36]  Michele Biasutti,et al.  The student experience of a collaborative e-learning university module , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[37]  George Bradford.  A relationship study of student satisfaction with learning online and cognitive load: Initial results , 2011, Internet High. Educ..

[38]  Kyu Yon Lim,et al.  Investigating the structural relationships among organisational support, learning flow, learners' satisfaction and learning transfer in corporate e-learning , 2011, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[39]  Meagan Karvonen,et al.  Faculty instructional attitudes, interest, and intention: Predictors of Web 2.0 use in online courses , 2011, Internet High. Educ..

[40]  Peter Reimann,et al.  Design-Based Research , 2011 .

[41]  Chiungsui Chang.  Usability testing for e-learning material for new employee training: A design-based research approach , 2011, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[42]  Yao-Ting Sung,et al.  Evaluating the reliability and impact of a quality assurance system for E-learning courseware , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[43]  J. W. Gikandi,et al.  Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[44]  Robert Rueda,et al.  Situational interest, computer self-efficacy and self-regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education , 2012, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[45]  Karen Swan,et al.  Linking online course design and implementation to learning outcomes: A design experiment , 2012, Internet High. Educ..

[46]  Jered Borup,et al.  Improving online social presence through asynchronous video , 2012, Internet High. Educ..

[47]  Peter Shea,et al.  Learning presence as a moderator in the community of inquiry model , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[48]  Stephen A. Sivo,et al.  Predicting continued use of online teacher professional development and the influence of social presence and sociability , 2012, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[49]  Kenneth D. Jones,et al.  Exploring the complex relations between achievement emotions and self-regulated learning behaviors in online learning , 2012, Internet High. Educ..

[50]  Amy Wilson,et al.  Effective professional development for e-learning: What do the managers think? , 2012, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[51]  Hangjung Zo,et al.  Critical success factors for e-learning in developing countries: A comparative analysis between ICT experts and faculty , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[52]  Fintan Culwin,et al.  Supporting social awareness in collaborative e-learning , 2012, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[53]  Ola Knutsson,et al.  Identifying different registers of digital literacy in virtual learning environments , 2012, Internet High. Educ..

[54]  Albert Sangrà,et al.  Building an inclusive definition of e-learning: An approach to the conceptual framework , 2012 .

[55]  Erica C. Boling,et al.  Cutting the distance in distance education: Perspectives on what promotes positive, online learning experiences , 2012, Internet High. Educ..

[56]  Miguel Ángel Montero Alonso,et al.  Gender differences in e-learning satisfaction , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[57]  Angilberto Sabino de Freitas,et al.  Managerial action and sensemaking in e-learning implementation in Brazilian business schools , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[58]  Youngju Lee,et al.  Discriminating factors between completers of and dropouts from online learning courses , 2013, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[59]  Douglas R. Vogel,et al.  Predicting user acceptance of collaborative technologies: An extension of the technology acceptance model for e-learning , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[60]  Shu-Sheng Liaw,et al.  Perceived satisfaction, perceived usefulness and interactive learning environments as predictors to self-regulation in e-learning environments , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[61]  Allison Littlejohn,et al.  Sustainable e-Learning: Toward a Coherent Body of Knowledge , 2013, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[62]  Moon-Heum Cho,et al.  Students' self-regulation for interaction with others in online learning environments , 2013, Internet High. Educ..

[63]  Zehui Zhan,et al.  Academic self-concept and social presence in face-to-face and online learning: Perceptions and effects on students' learning achievement and satisfaction across environments , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[64]  Jaeho Choi,et al.  A structural equation model of predictors of online learning retention , 2013, Internet High. Educ..

[65]  J. Arbaugh.  Does academic discipline moderate CoI-course outcomes relationships in online MBA courses? , 2013, Internet High. Educ..

[66]  Matthew J. Kruger-Ross,et al.  Predicting online learning success: Applying the situational theory of publics to the virtual classroom , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[67]  Maria D. Avgerinou,et al.  The effects of technology on the Community of Inquiry and satisfaction with online courses , 2013, Internet High. Educ..

[68]  Seung Won Park,et al.  Affective and motivational factors of learning in online mathematics courses , 2014, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[69]  Rebecca Eynon,et al.  Communication patterns in massively open online courses , 2014, Internet High. Educ..

[70]  Karen Swan,et al.  A collaborative, design-based approach to improving an online program , 2014, Internet High. Educ..

[71]  Erica C. Boling,et al.  Using online tools for communication and collaboration: Understanding educators' experiences in an online course , 2011, Internet High. Educ..

[72]  Marek Hatala,et al.  Psychological characteristics in cognitive presence of communities of inquiry: A linguistic analysis of online discussions , 2014, Internet High. Educ..

[73]  Tzu-Hua Wang,et al.  Developing an assessment-centered e-Learning system for improving student learning effectiveness , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[74]  Şahin Gökçearslan,et al.  The effect of locus of control on learners' sense of community and academic success in the context of online learning communities , 2015, Internet High. Educ..

[75]  Chien Chou,et al.  Students' perceptions of instructors' roles in blended and online learning environments: A comparative study , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[76]  Allison Littlejohn,et al.  Instructional quality of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[77]  Yuh-Shy Chuang,et al.  The impacts of network centrality and self-regulation on an e-learning environment with the support of social network awareness , 2015, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[78]  Cathrine Tømte,et al.  Educating online student teachers to master professional digital competence: The TPACK-framework goes online , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[79]  Claire Wladis,et al.  Prior online course experience and G.P.A. as predictors of subsequent online STEM course outcomes , 2015, Internet High. Educ..

[80]  Jennifer Richardson,et al.  Examining reliability and validity of a Korean version of the Community of Inquiry instrument using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis , 2015, Internet High. Educ..

[81]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[82]  Antonio Robles,et al.  On the use of extended TAM to assess students' acceptance and intent to use third-generation learning management systems , 2015, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[83]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement , 2015, Systematic Reviews.

[84]  Donatella Persico,et al.  Methodological approaches in MOOC research: Retracing the myth of Proteus , 2015, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[85]  Judith Ramsay,et al.  Massive open online courses (MOOCs): Insights and challenges from a psychological perspective , 2015, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[86]  Ramón Tirado Morueta,et al.  Exploring social and cognitive presences in communities of inquiry to perform higher cognitive tasks , 2016, Internet High. Educ..

[87]  Mehrbakhsh Nilashi,et al.  Multi-criteria decision making approach in E-learning: A systematic review and classification , 2016, Appl. Soft Comput..

[88]  Wen-Hao David Huang,et al.  Can e-learning system enhance learning culture in the workplace? A comparison among companies in South Korea , 2016, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[89]  Kathrin Otrel-Cass,et al.  SpringerBriefs in Educational Communications and Technology , 2016 .

[90]  Jason Mazanov,et al.  Attitude, digital literacy and self efficacy: Flow-on effects for online learning behavior , 2016, Internet High. Educ..

[91]  Hossam Haick,et al.  Motivation to learn in massive open online courses: Examining aspects of language and social engagement , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[92]  Chao-Hsiu Chen,et al.  Beyond identifying privacy issues in e-learning settings - Implications for instructional designers , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[93]  Jun Sun,et al.  Multi-dimensional alignment between online instruction and course technology: A learner-centered perspective , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[94]  Tiago Oliveira,et al.  An e-Learning Theoretical Framework , 2016, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[95]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Community of Inquiry Framework for Research and Practice , 2016 .

[96]  T. Oliveira,et al.  Cultural impacts on e-learning systems' success , 2016, Internet High. Educ..

[97]  Ghada R. El Said,et al.  Exploring the factors affecting MOOC retention: A survey study , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[98]  Khe Foon Hew,et al.  Promoting engagement in online courses: What strategies can we learn from three highly rated MOOCS , 2016, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[99]  Jaclyn Broadbent,et al.  Comparing online and blended learner's self-regulated learning strategies and academic performance , 2017, Internet High. Educ..

[100]  Justin C. Ortagus.  From the periphery to prominence: An examination of the changing profile of online students in American higher education , 2017, Internet High. Educ..

[101]  Flavia Cavazotte,et al.  Explaining university students' effective use of e-learning platforms , 2017, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[102]  Gilly Salmon,et al.  Designing Massive Open Online Courses to take account of participant motivations and expectations , 2017, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[103]  Lloyd P. Rieber,et al.  Participation patterns in a massive open online course (MOOC) about statistics , 2017, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[104]  J. Michael Spector,et al.  A Critical Look at MOOCs , 2017 .

[105]  Mohamed Jemni,et al.  Open Education: from OERs to MOOCs , 2017 .

[106]  Ngoni Chipere,et al.  A framework for developing sustainable e-learning programmes , 2017 .

[107]  Elizabeth A. Swaggerty,et al.  Authenticity, relevance, and connectedness: Graduate students' learning preferences and experiences in an online reading education course , 2017, Internet High. Educ..

[108]  Ching-Ter Chang,et al.  Examining the students' behavioral intention to use e-learning in Azerbaijan? The General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-learning approach , 2017, Comput. Educ..

[109]  Jered Borup,et al.  An analysis of instructor social presence in online text and asynchronous video feedback comments , 2017, Internet High. Educ..

[110]  Rebecca Vivian,et al.  Systematic literature review: Self-Regulated Learning strategies using e-learning tools for Computer Science , 2018, Comput. Educ..

[111]  Tiago Oliveira,et al.  E-learning success determinants: Brazilian empirical study , 2018, Comput. Educ..

[112]  Online tools supporting the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and systematic maps: a case study on CADIMA and review of existing tools , 2018, Environmental Evidence.

[113]  Orhan Agirdag,et al.  Demographic data of MOOC learners: Can alternative survey deliveries improve current understandings? , 2018, Comput. Educ..

[114]  Hanna Vuojärvi,et al.  Toward personal and emotional connectivity in mobile higher education through asynchronous formative audio feedback , 2018, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[115]  Miri Barak,et al.  Motivating factors of MOOC completers: Comparing between university-affiliated students and general participants , 2018, Internet High. Educ..

[116]  Meina Zhu,et al.  A systematic review of research methods and topics of the empirical MOOC literature (2014-2016) , 2018, Internet High. Educ..

[117]  Jeongmin Lee,et al.  Learning Engagement and Persistence in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCS) , 2018, Comput. Educ..

[118]  Alyssa Friend Wise,et al.  Learning communities in the crowd: Characteristics of content related interactions and social relationships in MOOC discussion forums , 2018, Comput. Educ..

[119]  Joel Scanlan,et al.  Engagement and retention in VET MOOCs and online courses: A systematic review of literature from 2013 to 2017 , 2018, Comput. Educ..

[120]  Kadir Kozan,et al.  On the Nth presence for the Community of Inquiry framework , 2018, Comput. Educ..

[121]  Dongho Kim,et al.  Learning analytics to support self-regulated learning in asynchronous online courses: A case study at a women's university in South Korea , 2018, Comput. Educ..

[122]  Ingrid Noguera,et al.  A model for aligning assessment with competences and learning activities in online courses , 2018, Internet High. Educ..

[123]  H. Nicholas Bovee,et al.  Staying motivated to e-learn: Person- and variable-centred perspectives on the longitudinal risks and support , 2018, Comput. Educ..

[124]  George Siemens,et al.  Exploring communities of inquiry in Massive Open Online Courses , 2018, Comput. Educ..

[125]  Stefan Stenbom,et al.  A systematic review of the Community of Inquiry survey , 2018, Internet High. Educ..

[126]  Lian Niu.  A review of the application of logistic regression in educational research: common issues, implications, and suggestions , 2018, Educational Review.

[127]  Helena Rodrigues,et al.  Tracking e-learning through published papers: A systematic review , 2019, Comput. Educ..

[128]  Esteban Vázquez-Cano,et al.  Analysis of Interpersonal Competences in the Use of ICT in the Spanish University Context , 2020 .