How do emerging multinationals configure political connections across institutional contexts

Forming informal ties with political agents is viewed as a viable strategy for multinational enterprises seeking to enter emerging countries. Less is known about the conditions under which political connection is most helpful for firms dealing with cross-border institutional distance. We discuss the distinctive mechanisms through which emerging multinationals may benefit from both home and host political connections. Based on the strategy tripod perspective, we postulate that the importance of different types of connections depends on the overall configurations of a firm’s resources and industry characteristics, and these may change with institutional distance. Our analysis of a sample of Chinese high-tech manufacturing firms yields new insights into political connections, institutional distance and the strategy tripod perspective.

[1]  K. Meyer,et al.  Overcoming distrust: How state-owned enterprises adapt their foreign entries to institutional pressures abroad , 2014, Multinational Enterprises and Emerging Economies.

[2]  Donal Crilly,et al.  Predicting stakeholder orientation in the multinational enterprise: A mid-range theory , 2011, Research Methods in International Business.

[3]  Xiaohui Liu,et al.  Where to Seek Strategic Assets for Competitive Catch-up? A configurational study of emerging multinational enterprises expanding into foreign strategic factor markets , 2017 .

[4]  W. Tham,et al.  Foreign political connections , 2017 .

[5]  Nan Zhou,et al.  Categorizing the Liability of Foreignness: Ownership, Location, and Internalization-Specific Dimensions , 2016 .

[6]  Gregory Jackson,et al.  Varieties of Capitalism and institutional comparative advantage: A test and reinterpretation , 2016, Journal of International Business Studies.

[7]  Heather A. Haveman,et al.  The Dynamics of Political Embeddedness in China* , 2013 .

[8]  Jin‐hui Luo,et al.  Political Connections, Home Formal Institutions, and Internationalization: Evidence from China , 2016, Management and Organization Review.

[9]  Robbert Maseland,et al.  How institutions matter for international business: Institutional distance effects vs institutional profile effects , 2016 .

[10]  Mario Petrus Gerardus Schijven,et al.  Fuzzy Logic and the Market: A Configurational Approach to Investor Perceptions of Acquisition Announcements , 2016 .

[11]  M. Wright,et al.  Political Tie Heterogeneity and the Impact of Adverse Shocks on Firm Value , 2015 .

[12]  D. Siegel,et al.  A Review of the Nonmarket Strategy Literature , 2015 .

[13]  Nan Zhou,et al.  From home country to home base: : A dynamic approach to the liability of foreignness , 2015 .

[14]  Nan Jia,et al.  The Structure of Political Institutions and Effectiveness of Corporate Political Lobbying , 2014, Organ. Sci..

[15]  J. Duanmu.  State-owned MNCs and host country expropriation risk: The role of home state soft power and economic gunboat diplomacy , 2014 .

[16]  M. Wright,et al.  International experience and FDI location choices of Chinese firms: The moderating effects of home country government support and host country institutions , 2014 .

[17]  Chi‐Nien Chung,et al.  Portfolios of Political Ties and Business Group Strategy in Emerging Economies , 2014 .

[18]  L. Markoczy,et al.  The Continuing Importance of Political Ties in China , 2014 .

[19]  Johannes Meuer,et al.  Archetypes of Inter-firm Relations in the Implementation of Management Innovation: A Set-theoretic Study in China’s Biopharmaceutical Industry , 2014 .

[20]  Sali Li,et al.  The contingent value of CEO political connections: A study on IPO performance in China , 2013 .

[21]  Lin Cui,et al.  Experiential drivers of foreign direct investment by late-comer Asian firms: The Chinese evidence , 2013 .

[22]  Huan Zou,et al.  Institutions and the performance of politically connected M&As , 2013 .

[23]  Pankaj C. Patel,et al.  How Do Young Firms Manage Product Portfolio Complexity? The Role of Absorptive Capacity and Ambidexterity , 2012 .

[24]  Carsten Q. Schneider,et al.  Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: Contents , 2012 .

[25]  M. Wright,et al.  The Contingent Value of Corporate Political Ties , 2012 .

[26]  M. Kafouros,et al.  What drives outward FDI of Chinese firms? Testing the explanatory power of three theoretical frameworks , 2012 .

[27]  Mike W. Peng,et al.  The global strategy of emerging multinationals from China , 2012 .

[28]  Lin Cui,et al.  State ownership effect on firms' FDI ownership decisions under institutional pressure: a study of Chinese outward-investing firms , 2012 .

[29]  Lilach Nachum,et al.  Distance without direction: Restoring credibility to a much-loved construct , 2012 .

[30]  M. Dieleman,et al.  Using Organization Structure to Buffer Political Ties in Emerging Markets: A Case Study , 2011 .

[31]  Xiaohui Liu,et al.  Motives for Outward FDI of Chinese Private Firms Firm Resources, Industry Dynamics, and Government Policies , 2011, Management and Organization Review.

[32]  M. Maznevski,et al.  The relationship between networks, institutional development, and performance in foreign investments , 2011 .

[33]  Peer C. Fiss.  Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research , 2011 .

[34]  Thomas Greckhamer,et al.  Cross-cultural Differences in Compensation Level and Inequality across Occupations: A Set-theoretic Analysis , 2011 .

[35]  Mauro F. Guillén,et al.  An institutional approach to cross-national distance , 2010 .

[36]  Eric Thun,et al.  The dynamic value of MNE political embeddedness: The case of the Chinese automobile industry , 2010 .

[37]  Alvaro Cuervo-Cazurra,et al.  Obligating, Pressuring and Supporting Dimensions of the Environment and the Non-Market Advantages of Developing-Country Multinational Companies , 2010 .

[38]  Mihai Paunescu,et al.  Mapping the institutional capital of high-tech firms: A fuzzy-set analysis of capitalist variety and export performance , 2010 .

[39]  Yadong Luo,et al.  How emerging market governments promote outward FDI: Experience from China , 2010 .

[40]  J. Johanson,et al.  The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership , 2009 .

[41]  Sunny Li Sun,et al.  The Institution-Based View as a Third Leg for a Strategy Tripod. , 2009 .

[42]  Mauro F. Guillén,et al.  The American Model of the Multinational Firm and the “New” Multinationals From Emerging Economies , 2009 .

[43]  S. Globerman,et al.  Economic and strategic considerations surrounding Chinese FDI in the United States , 2009 .

[44]  K. Zhou,et al.  Competitive position, managerial ties, and profitability of foreign firms in China: an interactive perspective , 2009 .

[45]  J. Cantwell.  Location and the multinational enterprise , 2009 .

[46]  Saul Estrin,et al.  Institutions, resources and entry strategies in emerging economies , 2009 .

[47]  Yi Jiang,et al.  An institution-based view of international business strategy: a focus on emerging economies , 2008 .

[48]  Richard Deeg,et al.  Comparing capitalisms: understanding institutional diversity and its implications for international business , 2008 .

[49]  K. Zhou,et al.  Do managerial ties in China always produce value? Competition, uncertainty, and domestic vs. foreign firms , 2008 .

[50]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Redesigning social inquiry , 2008 .

[51]  J. Siegel,et al.  Contingent Political Capital and International Alliances: Evidence from South Korea , 2007 .

[52]  Peer C. Fiss.  A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations , 2007 .

[53]  Haiyang Li,et al.  The role of managers' political networking and functional experience in new venture performance: Evidence from China's transition economy , 2007 .

[54]  Clegg,et al.  The determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investment , 2007 .

[55]  Ajai S. Gaur,et al.  Ownership Strategies and Survival of Foreign Subsidiaries: Impacts of Institutional Distance and Experience , 2007 .

[56]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation and Peformance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[57]  Jedrzej George Frynas,et al.  First mover advantages in international business and firm‐specific political resources , 2006 .

[58]  P. Beamish,et al.  INTERNATIONAL DIVERSIFICATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: THE S-CURVE HYPOTHESIS , 2004 .

[59]  Mike W. Peng.  Identifying the big question in international business research , 2004 .

[60]  Mara Faccio,et al.  Politically Connected Firms , 2004 .

[61]  Yadong Luo.  Industrial dynamics and managerial networking in an emerging market: the case of China , 2003 .

[62]  R. Mudambi,et al.  Institutions and internation business: a theoretical overview , 2002 .

[63]  O. Shenkar,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL DISTANCE AND THE MULTINATIONAL ENTERPRISE , 2002 .

[64]  Haiyang Li,et al.  The adoption of agency business activity, product innovation, and performance in Chinese technology ventures , 2002 .

[65]  Yadong Luo.  Toward a Cooperative View of MNC-Host Government Relations: Building Blocks and Performance Implications , 2001 .

[66]  Yadong Luo,et al.  Guanxi and organizational dynamics: organizational networking in Chinese firms , 2001 .

[67]  Mike W. Peng,et al.  Managerial Ties and Firm Performance in a Transition Economy: The Nature of a Micro-Macro Link , 2000 .

[68]  Håkan Boter,et al.  Industry characteristics and internationalization processes in small firms , 1996 .

[69]  Henry W. Lane,et al.  The Psychic Distance Paradox , 1996 .

[70]  G. T. Lumpkin,et al.  Simplicity as a Strategy-Making Process: The Effects of Stage of Organizational Development and Environment on Performance , 1995 .

[71]  Srilata Zaheer.  Overcoming the Liability of Foreignness , 1995 .

[72]  J. Boddewyn,et al.  International-Business Political Behavior: New Theoretical Directions , 1994 .

[73]  M. Erramilli.  The Experience Factor in Foreign Market Entry Behavior of Service Firms , 1991 .

[74]  Gary J. Castrogiovanni,et al.  Environmental Munihcence; A Theoretical Assessment , 1991 .

[75]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[76]  J. Boddewyn.  Political Aspects of MNE Theory , 1988 .

[77]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Dimensions of Organizational Task Environments. , 1984 .

[78]  P. H. Friesen,et al.  Strategy‐making and environment: The third link , 1983 .

[79]  J. Johanson,et al.  The Internationalization Process of the Firm—A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments , 1977 .